The working women in the United States are caught in a “gender gap” when it comes to their paychecks. Almost half of the entire labor force in American is women, but men are consistently paid more for the same work. President Obama addressed this gap as a family issue. The Supreme Court in 2007, heard the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, brought by Lilly Ledbetter, a longtime employee of Goodyear Tire which was a win for women. The United States Senate, on the Republican side of the aisle, chose to fight the Paycheck Fairness Act. Made up mostly men, both the Democrat and Republican Senators, used the gender gap like a game of tennis. Their game was a loss for women and a tie for them.
In a 2014 release the Whitehouse’s web site
…show more content…
Her pay was equal to a man’s when she started working for Goodyear in 1979. When she reached retirement age pay had never reached that of the men who started working the same time she did at the Alabama plant. She brought suit against Goodyear for sexual discrimination in 1998. The case traveled up the Judicial Court System and was brought before the Supreme Court in 2007. On May 29, 2007 the court ruled in her favor. Most women thought that this judgment would change the way that women were treated by companies when it came to payday. Seven years later women were still fighting for equal pay. In 2014, Republicans blocked an Equal Pay …show more content…
Republicans accused the Democrats of using the issue of equal pay for women as a political move to get their votes in the Congressional election. The Act was a measure to close the gender gap in the workplace. Both Democrats and Republicans confessed to doing what was right for women. The Senator from Nevada, Harry Reid, came to the floor of the Senate to announce, “For reasons known only to them, Senate Republicans don’t seem to be interested in closing wage gaps for working women.” Republicans encountered by saying that there was already laws in place to protect women. They put the blame on the Democrats. Their take was the Democrats were using women to distract people from looking at the health care law. The Paycheck Fairness Act would mandate that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would get pay records from business. President Obama directed the federal contractors to also share their employees pat records. The Republicans responded by reproached Democrats for women living in poverty and falling wages. The Democrats counteracted by pushing for an increase in minimum wage and extended unemployment payments. The Act came to a vote with 53 for Paycheck Fairness and 44 against. This vote was only six votes short of a majority. Senator Reid says that he will bring the Act to the floor again for a vote in hopes of passage.
In conclusion, the three branches of government have different ideas on how to protect
One of the first Supreme Court Cases that have happened to obtained Women’s Rights was in 1971. In 1971, there was a Supreme Court Cases called Phillips V. Martin Marietta Corporation. In of this court case Phillips tried to apply for a job of being of a preschool teacher and was denied. Phillips wasn’t the only one who applied and didn’t receive the job, since 80% of the applicants were denied because the were all women. So, once has just Phillips found out that she was denied from a job, just by her gender she took it the authorities to show them what Martin Marietta Corp. was doing.
McConnell chose to use his political power in the hopes of bringing female voters to the Republican cause, especially within the framework of a less radical view of women I the workplace and in education. This Republican perception of the economic needs of women is one way in which McConnell, which illustrates the use of TV advertisements to counter the accusations of Grimes in the call for grater equality for women in education and in the
Many people think the most predominant social injustice in the 1960’s revolved around racism, which was mostly true. But few realize that gender inequality was a much more harmful than racism in aspects such as employment, family life, and government service, where women were disregarded and underpaid. To notice the differences between discriminations in gender and race, one would have to fall into both categories as Shirley Chisholm had, the first African-American Congresswoman. Having experienced this disadvantage, Chisholm directed her career in a different direction. On August 10th, 1969 in Washington D.C., Shirley Chisholm made history by addressing gender inequality in her speech, “For The Equal Rights Amendment”.
On 20th January 2009, Barack Obama took office as the 44th president of the United States of America, becoming the first African American President in the history of the United States of America, a country where just fifty years ago he would not have been allowed to vote because of his skin colour (Alexander, 2009 p.5). Barack Obama was a popular presidential candidate and according to Corey (2009) “Almost 67 million people had voted for Barack Obama, including some voters that had never voted before, resulting in the most votes a president had ever received so far” (p.40). When Barack Obama wont the election in November 2008, his supporters believed that there would be change and that years of war, global warming, economic difficulties and
Not only was voting rights an issue, but issues such and equal pay, employment, and general gender bias were still amidst in this century. Although these gender transgressions were brought to attention, not all judges/justice’s would agree with the opinion of the court. For example, in the case of Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, the ultimate decision was that no violations to the Equal Pay Act were enacted, regardless of how unjust the female to male pay ratio was, in male
Those speaking for the working class were strongly opposed, arguing that employed women needed special protections regarding working conditions and hours. In 1972, it passed both houses of Congress and was submitted to the state legislatures for ratification. It seemed headed for quick approval until Phyllis Schlafly mobilized conservative women
As modern society has made clear, women have the ability to perform with equal skill and success in virtually every endeavor engaged in by men, including employment, athletics, academics and politics. Yet discrimination on the basis of sex has a long history in the United States, and its residual effects still operate to keep women's salaries lower and opportunities fewer in the employment
Research shows wage gaps are solely a product of the choices of the second party. Woman have chosen what level of education they wish to pursue, the fields they wish to be in, and where they work. When looking back at a censuses of the early-to-mid 1900’s the majority of working women worked at small enterprises rather than booming companies: large Firms pay at higher rates, their payout going predominantly to males of the working class (Rubenstien, Michael Harvey). When taken under the scope, large enterprises rejected woman workers, and if they did hire, the lady’s income would be significantly smaller. Consequently, companies would deny the reason being that they were of a different sex, and rather blame it on how little education the skill the person had, “Frequently, even when given raises, their new pay still comes short of that of their male coworkers.
There is still an unfair payment when it comes to both sexes, but it was a great step towards a great civil
Did they win their fight, or are they fighting for no reason? Equal pay was always a struggle for women. When men and women in the same workplace got paid different amounts for the same amount of work it angered women. “The persistence of gender-based wage disparities — commonly referred to as the pay or wage gap — has been the subject of extensive debate and commentary.
While it is impressive that the NFL has hired its first female ref, males are the overwhelming majority in politics. Twenty percent of women are Senators and nineteen percent are in the House of Representatives. Things are looking up with the Presidential Election approaching and the chance America’s first female president, Hillary Clinton. She understands that there is still a pay gap but acknowledges the progress being made towards full equality. She even agrees that women’s rights “truly is the unfinished business of the 21st century”
Shining some much-needed sunlight on the gender wage gap will make a difference for every one of us, men and women, right now.” (www.nytimes.com, 16). “It’s the twenty-first century, and the gender wage gap affects the daily life of women throughout the country, at every economic level, from cashier to CEO. Is it fair? No.
The passing of this law saw all employees get treated equally, and the biases that existed ended. Its legislation led to the reduction in the rate of unemployment in organizations. Discrimination based on sex preferences has been the major challenge and this drove the women rights movement to stress for the legislation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Aiken, Salmon, & Hanges, 2013.) Despite Title VII of the Civil Rights Act helping to alleviate the issue of discrimination especially on women in employment sectors, it did not meet all the needs of women in the
Gender equality: the pinnacle concept that American society is not-so desperately trying to achieve. Many Americans have convinced themselves that gender equality was remedied by the Nineteenth Amendment and the Second Feminist Movement, and have not considered the thousands of steps that are left on the journey. In recent years, a matter of public interest has been the gender wage gap, stating that women are earning significantly less money than men for doing an equivalent amount of work. Critics of the effort to “break the glass ceiling” claim that a pay gap does not exist, and that if it does, it is because women either do not work as hard, have to tend to their families, or hold lower paying jobs. However, the gender pay gap has been proven to exist in a variety of different forms,
The United States is currently facing an economical problem that involves males and female differences within the workplace. Males are given bigger and sometimes even better rewards for doing equal amounts of work as their female counterparts. Females are frequently not receiving the same wage even if they can complete the same job of a male. Also, females are less likely to get promoted within their job if they are competing against a male. A source states, “Women are now more likely to have college degrees than men, yet they still face a pay gap in every single education level,