LITERATURE REVIEW
“Community governance refers to the processes for making all the decisions and plans that affect life in the community, whether made by public or private organizations or by citizens.” It is considered to me much more than just the mere theoretical or institutional processes but the real meaningful and impactful effect that it has on the lives of citizens. The real measure of success of community governance is considered to be how much enhancement it has done in the lives of citizens of a locality relative to the perceived status quo. So, it is crucial to measure results. But what should be done, and what results should be measured? This raises a lot of research challenges as well. (Effective Community Governance, Accessed on MAR 2015)
“The most important results vary from one community to another, and different people within a community have different perceptions about what the community should try to improve and how success should be measured.” So, it is vital to have engagement from citizens in matters of community
…show more content…
Hence the issue of community governance has been trending and prominent among academic circles as well in recent years. Community ideas, energy, social capital and local knowledge are now seen to be key ingredients for solving a range of entrenched policy challenges and achieving a broad range of goals from economic prosperity to social inclusion (Adams and Hess 2001; Yanow 2003; Wiseman 2006). The real question is how much of social inclusion has Lake City Concord been able to achieve in recent years. And whether community ideas, energy and social capital are being used in achieving policy effects in matters of governance here is the
3. Community involvement: individuals begin addressing the issue as a community concern,
During the Wes Moore event he said many valuable things that can be applied to all different aspects of life. His speech connects to the theme of “Just Communities” in two important ways. One way is how the people of Baltimore care deeply for what their environment is like. After the riots and fights he says how no one shows the people who came out to clean up the aftermath. This has been a common part of “just communities” that our class has studied.
Throughout the course of the book, Peter Kageyama mentions the city of Detroit to point out crucial keys in why loving cities like Detroit can bring stability to its economic development. He conveys that economic developers, mayors and city planners have been seeking to create amenity rich destinations to attract innovative human capital for its city. Therefore, he poses the question of "Is your city meaning-rich"? (Kageyama 2011) A meaning-rich city is one that is a creative and innovative space for every community.
Thus, it is better to improve the social determinants of a community as a whole instead of one person in that community bettering themselves. Working together to fix the aspects of said society that are negatively affecting an area along with everyone doing what they can to add to the improvement of life
Community accountability and community based approaches challenge us to seriously address violence and intimate harms without reproducing the technologies of individualization, pathology, penality, protection under the authority of heteropatriarchy and white supremacy, and criminalisation, all of which continually deny and subvert our notions of safety and justice. We are asked to consider recover and build the potential of community while recognizing and disengaging from strategies that undermine the possibility of community formation. Community accountability is any strategy to address violence, abuse, or harm that creates safety, justice, reparations, and healing without relying on police, prisons, child protection services, or any other state
The word community is explained by the Oxford Dictionary as “people of a district or country considered collectively, especially in the context of social values and responsibilities; society.” A community is determined by shared characteristics which could include location, culture, race, or beliefs. The common characteristics of a community can also dictate who belongs and who does not. Maycomb County was a community with a defined structure.
Speaking to Richard’s mother, I encouraged her participation in activities, where both she and her son could bond. They did several activities together, and slowly a genuine smile began forming on Richard 's face. By the end of the summer, I had a different perspective on communal change. Communities as a whole consist of distinct individuals, many desiring to see change; change, which can be started by a single person impacting another 's actions. Richard’s family was my avenue into that process.
Society is fooled into believing in the applied connection among people. Benedict Anderson’s idea of imagined communities emphasizes that, “… the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion” (5). Members of neighborhoods, cities, states, or countries feel a sense of unity with other members for living in the same place or maybe having the same basic values, but true unity comes from understanding the similarities among each other, considering the impact a person can have on another, and caring about lives. Recognizing the importance of lives being socially intertwined is necessary to sustain a considerate society.
”(Twelvetrees, 2001) It takes special skills to work within communities especially if the community is not very open to suggestions and the issue to be addressed is sensitive. To be effective in community work, it takes a collaborative effort and partnership to bring about changes and advance the community. When working with communities, the planned change model as developed by Kirst-Ashman & Hull (2009) is a tool that can be utilized.
Introduction Community work models are valuable for directing practitioners’ work. Nonetheless, knowledge of practical community work models is still inadequate. Scholars and practitioners consider technical knowledge of practical community work to be derived from actual cases. This knowledge allows community workers to choose the best course of action in real-life situations (Henderson and Thomas, 2012; Hardcastle et al., 2011). Furthermore, model development is important for comprehensive knowledge guidance, specifically for helping workers accurately play their role in terms of practical skills (Harris, 2009; Henderson and Thomas, 2012; Homan, 2011).
As individuals, and in groups, we can change our communities. We can set up neighbourhoods and institutions in which people commit them self to working to form strong relationship bonds and alliances with people of diverse cultures and backgrounds.
The community has had an unforgettable impact on the development of cultural values, and so should not be delegated to a small area. A community is a collection of individuals who share similar cultural values and traditions and act upon those values in such a way that the collective good of all is influenced. By contrast, a neighborhood is an area that can be defined on a city map. It is a collection of individuals that live in geographic proximity and often depend upon the same resources. Of course, this disparity in definitions leads to the question of how both communities and neighborhoods go through the process of formation.
Each community is different from the other, one plan that ends up working in a city can probably end up not working in another city. This leads to police and community problem-solving and citizen involvement to eliminate the number of ways to decrease crime. When a citizen becomes more active in taking care of their own community, they start to understand what officers go through to keep everyone safe (Strehlow,2017). There are, however, disadvantages to community policing, like having the opposite effect of what it should do. For example, this could lead to relationships between officers and communities worsening.
2. Literature Reviews 2.1 Perspectives on Community Policing This section provides a review of the relevant literature that underpins this study. As argued in the previous paragraph, the concept of community policing, its drivers and purposes can be considered as key unresolved issues in the literature. In this sense, two background questions have guided this literature review section – these being: i) what is community policing; and ii) what are the key drivers for the development and application of community policing?
Community service does not only have a profound impact on our community, but the impact it has on the individual people is even greater. The concept of community service has always been something that I grew up with, and now that I am older I better understand how important community service is for society. I have participated in community service activities. Starting in elementary school, I helped feed the homeless and rescue animals. Even with my wide range of volunteer experience, it was difficult to find an activity that would be meaningful and fulfill my thirty-hour obligation for my senior project.