s “Labour is the real measure of the exchange value of all commodities”.
This is the famous labour theory of value, as an extension of this theory Adam Smith he went to explain price as Natural Price and Market Price. Natural price is the price that covers rent, wages and profit expended in production and marketing of the product. The increase or decrease in the natural price depending on “effectual demand” (demand of those who are willing to pay natural price) is called market price, when this happens there will be an exceeding production of this product so as to meet the demand and thus the price will be brought down to its natural level. Thus Adam smith explains the natural price is always the central price around which the prices of all
…show more content…
a) exchange value b) value in use. Use value as such lies outside the sphere of investigation of political economy. Another point we have to remember is, by labour Marx referred to simple average labour. Skilled work is counted as multiple of unskilled average labour. According to Marx, the value of a product is measured in units of simple average labour. Though Marxian theory of value is based on the Ricardian theory of value, there is one main difference. Ricardo believed that the relative values of different commodities were proportional to the amount of labour expended on them, Marx argued that amount of time invested in labour determines the absolute value of goods. Thus labour is what defines the value of a product and Marx suggested that the whole fruit of labour must be received by the labourers as there is no thing that has any value devoid of human labour involved in its acquisition. This was the foundation of thought which lead to Surplus Value that capitalists extract out of exploitation of the labourers. Thus the Marxian theory of exploitation was developed on the basis of Labour theory of …show more content…
For example: If a worker working for 8 hours per day can produce value worth 80 rupees and his wages is for 8 hours. Now if the worker is forced to work for 16 hours per day without increasing his wages then the extra 80 rupees worth created during the second 8 hours is the surplus value.
To explain further Marx differentiates between simple commodity production and capitalist commodity production. In simple commodity production (C-M-C) a producer sells his products in order to buy other products as per his requirement. But in Capitalist Commodity Production (M-C-M*) the producer starts with money where he buys labour and materials for his production using money and then he sells his product for more money, thus generating a profit. The profit made by the capitalist is equal to M* - M. Marx called this profit as the Surplus Value
II. Write notes on any Four of the following
1. Division of Labour a
“People have said, mobs are crazy, you cant tell what they do.’ Why don’t people look at mobs as men, but as mobs? A mob nearly always seems to act reasonable, for a mob.” Says John Steinbeck in his major work, In Dubious Battle.
Marx argued that there are two classes of people that exist in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie refer to the upper class that own the means of production and whose central concern is the value of property. On the other hand, the proletariat describes the working class wageworkers in a capitalist society. Marx argued that the bourgeoisie simply exploited the proletariat, and the physical labor produced by the proletariat generated more wealth for the capitalist, leaving laborers under payed and machine-like. During this process, Marx believed that through this system of mass production, laborers were stripped of individual imagination and as a result, left individuals feeling alienated to their own emotions and erotic feelings in order to maximize production and wealth.
This is because despite the energy of labor and the being of the labor which are put into the product, that product itself doesn’t belong to the laborer nor do they receive any benefits from the product i.e., ‘the fruits of their labor’. In a sense, the laborer loses something of himself during the time spent creating this estranged object, as it doesn 't identify with it as a meaningful part of its own presence as a person, yet simply as an independent entity alienated to itself. Marx states that the “worker puts his life into the object; but now his life no longer belongs to him but to the object” (29). Therefore, the more labor one puts into a product the more powerful and estranged the world of products becomes of them. This estrangement can become so acute that the bare necessities of living are taken from the laborer as the more products they produce, the less they possess.
The economic views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx Microeconomics Eduardo De Oliveira Superti Table of Contents: Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The economic views of Adam Smith 5 The economic views of Karl Marx 6 Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx 7 Examples in the world of today 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction Adam Smith and Karl Marx were completely contrasting economists throughout their time and had an enormous effect on the world and the way we view economics. They represent the ideas of capitalism and socialism.
In the article, “Capital” Marx emphasis on “commodities”, explores the sources of “value” by asking what determines the worth or price of goods bought and sold on the industry. Marx draws a distinction between “use-value” and “exchange-value when he states, “In the circulation C—M—C, the money is in the end converted into a commodity, that serves as a use-value; it is spent once for all. In the inverted form, M—C—M, on the contrary, the buyer lays out money in order that, as a seller, he may recover money
The capitalist society is defined as “a historically specific way of organizing commodity production; produces profit for the owners of the means of production; based on structured on structured inequality between capitalists and wage labors whose exploited labor produces capitalist profit”(Dillon 72). Karl Marx offers several critiques of capitalism. He especially critiques job competition and how this can lead to the exploitation of wage workers. As California Warehouses Grow, Labor Issues are a Concern by Jennifer Medina highlights some of Marx’s concerns. Capitalism is based upon the creation of surplus value or profit.
Marx believed that the current capitalist society is separated into two classes, the Proletariat society, and Bourgeois society. The Proletarians, as perceived by Marx, are part of the working class that only possess one significant material value, that is the ability to work, or labour power. The Bourgeoise, on the other hand, is the societal class that owns the means of production and hence rule over the Proletarians. As I quote from Marx’s book, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1988, p. 473)
Industrialization also enhanced the capitalism which is focused on the issue of more profit and conflict between capital and workers. While owner of productions take more profit with less labor, workers take less profit even with much more labor force. Karl Marx is one of the thinkers who criticizes this situation of capitalism in terms of workers and capitals in industry, especially he focuses on the situation of
Marx talked about slavery or ‘production’ a lot, he thought that, “Production was mainly based on slave labor” Saying that slaves are machines and will make things such as clothes and that citizens with money could be lazy and not need to invent things As sain here; “so the citizens had no need to increase production with practical innovations”. This is an example of how material relations help to affect philosophical reflections in society.” (389)
Karl Heinrich Marx was a German philosopher, economist, social scientist, sociologist, historian, journalist and revolutionary socialist. Marx was born on 5 May 1818 in Germany and died on 14 March 1883 in London. Karl Marx is regarded to be one of the founding fathers of Sociology. Capitalism, in layman’s term means “an economic, political, and social system in which property, business, and industry are privately owned, directed towards making the greatest possible profits for successful organizations and people.” (Cambridge Dictionary, 2014).
Adam Smith, David Ricardo or Karl Marx are known for many as the pioneers of contemporary economies. Their Work and researches were the bases of most of nowadays economic models used by countries around the world. Adam Smith, David Ricardo and their followers were labeled as the classical economists when later on Karl Marx and his followers were labeled as the Marxists. These two economic schools were some of the biggest in history, but yet differed in many ways. Through this paper, we would discuss the says of the Classical and Marxism schools concerning their views on wages, their different opinions about the theory of value, their sides about capital accumulation and finally the different point of view of the schools regarding the diminishing returns.
The second, is alienation from the product. In Marxist time and in today’s modern world we are involved in an abundance of mass production. In a capitalist system, people are placed in a position where they are responsible in making a minor part of the goods. The goods of work belong to the capitalist and is sold for their profit, whereas the workers gain nothing. Therefore, Marx concluded that the greater effort the workers put into their job, the lesser they benefit.
Marx’s theory on exploitation is related to his earlier writings on the theory of alienation. They are both similar in that they are both highly critical of the capitalist system. Grint,(2005) emphasises that before Karl Marx nobody had ever confronted the idea of exploitive wage labour, many great thinkers of Marx’s time like Locke and Ricardo thought that the value of the wage labour was exactly equivalent to the labour expended while producing a product. Watson,T.J (2008) states that “ capitalist employment is exploitive in attempting to take from working people the value which they create through their labour and which is properly their own. ”P.62.
Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.