Motlow State Community College does not offer a cafeteria for students at the Smyrna Center. Constructing a cafeteria at Motlow State Community College would be beneficial for everyone, including the staff and students. A cafeteria would offer convenience for students and staff, increase the attendance rate, and allow students to engage in social interactions with one another. Not only is cafeteria favorable for the Motlow State community, but it would multiply the revenue for the school. Predominantly, constructing a cafeteria will improve the Smyrna campus as a whole. Many students and staff have a full day of classes and having a full schedule does not permit enough time to go off campus for lunch. In addition, there are some students that get dropped off by their family, friends or public transportation and not able to leave during the day. That means some students are bound to stay on campus and limited to the junk food in the vending machines. Poor weather could also limit the students from going out and the cafeteria could be utilized in times like this. A cafeteria would offer staff and students the convenience and the choice of having a healthier meal on campus. Having access to a cafeteria would limit the amount of students that leave campus for lunch. Students are known to leave …show more content…
The extra funds would have to be used to renovate a space that could support a dining facility. Funds would also need to be directed towards maintenance of the facility, staff, food supplies, kitchen supplies, along with waste management. Although, resources and time would need to be provided for the initial renovation of the facility, over time, having a cafeteria would increase revenue for the school. Students and faculty members will utilize the cafeteria and compensate for the funds initially used, and the school will continue to make
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Hms needs bigger servings. First our seventh and eighth graders eat the same lunch of an average first grader still, Hms need a bigger serving size to get through the day and and pay attention in class That 's why we can 't have the same lunch as a first grader. Also, A bigger lunch is necessary because we need more nutrients so we can focus and feel better. In Addition, Hms needs to have more food for at least 1,000 kids and more because usually the cafeteria runs out of food by then so 6th period lunch gets nothing but crumbs. in conclusion, there 's 3 reasons why HMS needs bigger and better
As I walked into the cafeteria, I caught a whiff of the food being prepared in the cafeteria and thought to myself, “Why can’t we go off-campus to get lunch?” While SLA, the lunch program at Catholic High, provides the school lunches, there could be an alternative solution to this. Unfortunately, students are detained at school during lunch hours and are not able to leave campus during lunch forcing them to be served by SLA or bring their own lunch. If Catholic High School were to introduce an open-campus lunch, students and faculty would benefit greatly. While SLA does provide the lunch at CHS, they do not live up to their standard of “high quality, nutritious, and cost efficient”.
As a result of this transition, the school would save a lot food as well as decreasing the amount of food waste and pollution caused by the scraps of food left over. Providing samples of the food being served would allow students to pick an entrée they will actually eat rather than having the students choose items of food they don’t like and will
During lunchtime, students generally make their way through the crowded cafeteria to sit with their friends, and enjoy their lunch while being supervised; however, many schools are now authorizing students to have an open campus lunchtime. An open campus allows students to leave school campus unsupervised to have lunch or hang out at a local restaurant or business. Having an open campus is beneficial because it allows students to gain independence, responsibility, trust, the health of students, socialize with friends, and help increase business at local restaurants. Therefore, I believe Arapahoe should continue to have an open campus for the benefit of our students. Having an open campus allows students to leave the school grounds to have lunch outside and be able to socialize with their peers.
If the school has a closed campus they should at least get better food. The food at the schools doesn’t have great food. Some food isn’t even made right. The school has basicly the same food almost every single day. Students aren’t going to get the right nutrients they need if they have a closed campus.
Breakfast food is supposed to last you until lunch and if students dont eat breakfast then they are going to have a long day ahead of them. Every week through out the school year there are some lunches that students love and can not wait for the day to come so they can have that certain meal at lunch. If students actually like the lunch that is given to them the school would not have to worry about which student has or has not eaten lunch through the day. Having lunch is an important meal through the day because it is in the middle of the day and some students are exhausted from sitting in a classroom since 8 am. Changing the lunch menu to a new and healthier lunch menu is not going to change a students mindset on eating healthy food.
Second Persuasive Essay St. labre high school and middle school would be affected by the change of an eight period day to a seven period day, it would allow the high school to have more learning time in class but one less elective, it would allow the middle school to either continue to eat lunch with the high school or have another thing to do with the extra time. St. Labre academy should change the schedule because people will not have to be rushed to lunch or rushed to eat lunch , also if the middle school decides to not eat with the high school there will be more sitting opportunities at the cafeteria. The middle school will also be able to freely eat there lunch in peace without worrying about where to sit. St. Labre would be more
The article “9 Primary Pros and Cons of Open Campus Lunch” states that students could be “physically assaulted [or] … hit by a vehicle” (2015). If a student was going home during lunch and they got in a bad wreck, they may lose the ability to think on their own, which would affect them cognitively. They would not be able to do any of their school work, and someone else may even have to think for them. Physically, they could get a broken bone, or they could even be paralyzed. If that’s the case, then they would need someone to complete even the smallest tasks for them.
Every year, more and more food is wasted and school lunches because nobody thinks they are good anymore. The quality of food goes down, less students eat, and more wish they could go and eat somewhere, anywhere, else. If schools were to add off-campus lunches, however, that would all improve. While off-campus lunches may promote unsupervised behavior, going off campus for lunches is a viable option because it is cheaper for the school, cheaper for the students, and makes sure everyone will eat.
There are reasons like, it doesn 't hold you for the rest of the day, etc. Say I eat school lunch, probably like the period after, I 'd get hungry yet again because not only do they limit the lunch food, but it 's not enough for most of our appetites.” Most kids do not eat school lunch because of that fact that it is tasteless and not beneficial. Students should be able to leave school during lunch to get away from smelly
Well often times teenagers are seen as irresponsible, but this is not always the case. There are tons of responsible teens out there that could handle leaving school for lunch. Sometime the teens don’t even want to go out to eat, sometimes they just need a break to recharge. Off-campus lunch provides money for our community, the students mature and learn to become responsible adults, not to mention they get a nice break from their learning environment.
With people so crowded together inside, it’s hard to not feel confined and cramped. With hair flying in the food and people stepping on other’s shoes, it’s utter mayhem. Yet grabbing lunch sounds like a straightforward activity though. You grab your lunch, pay for it, then sit down and hang out with your friends. If this isn’t normally thought of as an issue, then why are the girls in Baldwin’s upper school complaining about waiting in the lunch line for their lunch?
How many people skip lunch or just sit for about 30 minutes just waiting for lunch to be over? There’s many people that don’t like lunch, the lines are too long and you barely have time to eat because once you’ve gotten your food they announce that you are dismissed to class or the food they are giving is just not the type you like. I think you the principal should give us the right to decide if we want to stay and eat what they are giving in the cafeteria or if we want to go out and get food from another place. Either way they’re some people that still go and skip a period just so they can go and get food so that in lunch they’ll actually eat something.