The reasons we should have open lunch is because the lunchroom would be less crowded we could have one lunch period for all students, the kids are cooped up in classrooms for seven hours a day so it would give them a chance to get out for a little, and the final reason is that it gives kids a chance to have and learn about responsibilities. School lunch may not seem like a big deal, but for high school kids lunch could make or break their day. Open lunch is not an option here at Scott Community High School, and it hasn’t been for as long as I can remember. Open lunch would benefit our school because I feel like if we were able to go home, we could have more nutritional options. Going back to the first reason, I personally know that the majority of the student body would go home for lunch, if the opportunity was available.
According to the Berkshire Eagle “Open-campus lunch leads to students putting money back into the economy. Local establishments like Teddy’s restaurant would likely be out of business if not for the hundreds of students that pass through their doors every week at lunch.” When students eat at local establishments and fast food chains they are actually helping out their community. Students go out to eat all the time. When they bring their friends to an establishment they help their community grow.
During lunchtime, students generally make their way through the crowded cafeteria to sit with their friends, and enjoy their lunch while being supervised; however, many schools are now authorizing students to have an open campus lunchtime. An open campus allows students to leave school campus unsupervised to have lunch or hang out at a local restaurant or business. Having an open campus is beneficial because it allows students to gain independence, responsibility, trust, the health of students, socialize with friends, and help increase business at local restaurants. Therefore, I believe Arapahoe should continue to have an open campus for the benefit of our students. Having an open campus allows students to leave the school grounds to have lunch outside and be able to socialize with their peers.
Another advantage of having open campus lunches is that schools lunch ladies will have an easier time making all the lunches. They will not have to do as much cooking because about a quarter of the school will leave for lunch. That will also save the school a lot of money by not having to spend money on that much food. And most schools are tight on their budgets so it will free up some cap space and with that money the schools can buy better desks, better equipment, or whatever the school's
Every year, more and more food is wasted and school lunches because nobody thinks they are good anymore. The quality of food goes down, less students eat, and more wish they could go and eat somewhere, anywhere, else. If schools were to add off-campus lunches, however, that would all improve. While off-campus lunches may promote unsupervised behavior, going off campus for lunches is a viable option because it is cheaper for the school, cheaper for the students, and makes sure everyone will eat.
Have you ever wanted a different lunch besides school lunch? Well I have. The subject I will be discussing is students should have off campus lunch. The issue I chose is relevant because some students contact their parents to bring them lunch from home. The purpose or reason why I chose to discuss this topic is because students want a better lunch than school lunch.
As I walked into the cafeteria, I caught a whiff of the food being prepared in the cafeteria and thought to myself, “Why can’t we go off-campus to get lunch?” While SLA, the lunch program at Catholic High, provides the school lunches, there could be an alternative solution to this. Unfortunately, students are detained at school during lunch hours and are not able to leave campus during lunch forcing them to be served by SLA or bring their own lunch. If Catholic High School were to introduce an open-campus lunch, students and faculty would benefit greatly. While SLA does provide the lunch at CHS, they do not live up to their standard of “high quality, nutritious, and cost efficient”.
There are reasons like, it doesn 't hold you for the rest of the day, etc. Say I eat school lunch, probably like the period after, I 'd get hungry yet again because not only do they limit the lunch food, but it 's not enough for most of our appetites.” Most kids do not eat school lunch because of that fact that it is tasteless and not beneficial. Students should be able to leave school during lunch to get away from smelly
The article “9 Primary Pros and Cons of Open Campus Lunch” states that students could be “physically assaulted [or] … hit by a vehicle” (2015). If a student was going home during lunch and they got in a bad wreck, they may lose the ability to think on their own, which would affect them cognitively. They would not be able to do any of their school work, and someone else may even have to think for them. Physically, they could get a broken bone, or they could even be paralyzed. If that’s the case, then they would need someone to complete even the smallest tasks for them.
Hms needs bigger servings. First our seventh and eighth graders eat the same lunch of an average first grader still, Hms need a bigger serving size to get through the day and and pay attention in class That 's why we can 't have the same lunch as a first grader. Also, A bigger lunch is necessary because we need more nutrients so we can focus and feel better. In Addition, Hms needs to have more food for at least 1,000 kids and more because usually the cafeteria runs out of food by then so 6th period lunch gets nothing but crumbs. in conclusion, there 's 3 reasons why HMS needs bigger and better
How many people skip lunch or just sit for about 30 minutes just waiting for lunch to be over? There’s many people that don’t like lunch, the lines are too long and you barely have time to eat because once you’ve gotten your food they announce that you are dismissed to class or the food they are giving is just not the type you like. I think you the principal should give us the right to decide if we want to stay and eat what they are giving in the cafeteria or if we want to go out and get food from another place. Either way they’re some people that still go and skip a period just so they can go and get food so that in lunch they’ll actually eat something.
With people so crowded together inside, it’s hard to not feel confined and cramped. With hair flying in the food and people stepping on other’s shoes, it’s utter mayhem. Yet grabbing lunch sounds like a straightforward activity though. You grab your lunch, pay for it, then sit down and hang out with your friends. If this isn’t normally thought of as an issue, then why are the girls in Baldwin’s upper school complaining about waiting in the lunch line for their lunch?