NT Wright Argumentative Analysis

302 Words2 Pages
I found it interesting that NT Wright was clarifying the differences between God’s wrath and penal substitution with reform theologian Thomas Schreiner in this video. I was a little unsure, but this video affirmed my understanding that NT Wright was a unique blend of sweet and sour flavors enhanced by hot and spicy pepper that Thomas Schreiner was hot for him to take in. I agree with NT Wright argument the wrath of God. Why? Because Wright says that the cross was about much more than Jesus absolving us of sin. He further expressed by saying that God’s love took place upon Jesus. Wright provides skillfully crafted narrative of the history of God’s salvation from Adam through the tragic history of Israel until the coming of the messiah. Wright

More about NT Wright Argumentative Analysis

Open Document