Running Head: Case Study 2 No Child Left Behind Act Analysis
1
Case Study 2 No Child Left Behind Act Analysis
Lonnie Wilborn
PUA 44 Spring 2017
University of Las Vegas Nevada
Case Study 2 No Child Left Behind Act Analysis
2
Define the Problem
In this analysis of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), the authors (Stephens
& Wikstrom, 2007) posit the policies from this legislation that affects intergovernmental relations for the federal, state, and local levels. The decision maker in this case is the Department of Education which establishes educational policy, administers federal assistance , coordinates this assistance for education, and enforces federal education laws to protect privacy and civil rights. Through the principle position
…show more content…
117). When schools could not meet these requirements then
Case Study 2 No Child Left Behind Act Analysis
3
sanctioning by the Department of Education was enacted upon them including school improvement plans and major restructuring.The major criticism of the NCLB is that it violates the states’ rights to administer their own educational policies and traditional functions of local governments (Stephens & Wikstrom, 2007). These issues have arisen since the inception of the
NCLB evaluations by testing and national surveys from the Department of Education showing failing rates of students not meeting standards of proficiencies for several states. This criticism includes complaints that the NCLB mandates are not being funded federally to an appropriate level to allow success of educators for the educationally disadvantage school children but the retort is that these resources are not to supplant the states funding of education but to supplement state funding of local government by this federal agency. The urgency of the situation
…show more content…
The states and local governments argue that funding for NCLB mandates is not sufficient and policy implementation is unclear for regulation of this act. The
Department of Education believes that states are not putting their best effort forward in regards to meeting standards for the NCLB while the states are changing requirements and redefine the proficiency standards for their involvement to define achievement evaluations. Stephens &
Wikstrom (2007) believe that because “the NCLB requires administrators to report scores by race and ethnic groups” that it is successfully promoting the improvement of pupils’ performance of these minority groups (p.121). This shows that states funding of federal mandates can be quite difficult to meet the expectations without making modifications for evaluations to meet the needs of each state. Not all states are the same and meeting the NCLB standards as an equal measurement across national boundaries is not fair without making modifications to the evaluations of assessment for each state to meet these requirements. The key decision here is to match the appropriate level of educational funding to the needs of each state and provide
In addition to that,the Federal law policy of implementing penalties on districts that fall short of 95% students taking standardized tests may prove worse for that particular district as far as education aids are considered. If students are given choice to opt-out,then the wealthier and middle class may opt-out and reduce the funding available for students who are still interested in taking tests. So,the issue must be addressed accordingly leaving everyone happy rather than some part of people happy. So as to conclude,the policy makers or political leaders should consider this issue in a holistic approach and should not give the flexibility for students to opt-out of annual tests as it retains the conventional education standards of the country which in turn may help build a fairly considered society.
Although Lau v. Nichols had a positive impact on the education of non-English-speaking students, the Supreme Court stopped short of making revisions that would force school district to reexamine the school board’s illegal practices. The Supreme Court didn’t give the SFUSD a clear directive regarding provisions of specific programs that would satisfy Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This shortcoming keeps the debate alive as to whether or not appropriate programs for non-English-speaking students have been implemented correctly throughout the Unites States. Discussions are still prevalent in school districts, state legislatures, and
Although the national government wants students nationwide to receive the same education, they lack much needed skills for a student. The disagreements on education should be handled between the county and state governments. Not the national government. Controlling the education rights the state governments have is one example of
No Child Left Behind was passed by congress and was signed by President George Bush. The federal role was holding schools accountable for the students academic success due to No Child Left Behind law. Standard testing were given to ensuring that states and schools were performing and were achieving at a certain level. If states did not comply with the new requirements of No Child Left Behind then they were at risk of losing federal funding. The No Child Left Behind was ultimately created to change the fact that American education system was considered internationally competitive.
There are some issues with NCLB that will need to be addressed by Congress when thinking about revisions. The entire system of NCLB is based on a test. This angers teachers in many ways. Because the whole system centers on a standardized test, teachers are no longer teaching students new and exciting curriculum to help them grow. There is no more individualized instruction; everything is scripted curriculum to prepare kids for the test.
In California there are 6 million students that attend run-down, crumbling schools. However, this can all be changed with prop 51, prop 51 is a helping hand to all the public schools in California that are outdated. Prop 51 can ensure the wellbeing of our students, and help them get a great education. Prop 51 helps them out by repairing the schools, and constructing new buildings so that the students won’t be overcrowded in just one room.
In addition, the Government Accountability Office [GAO] (2016) reported: “from school years 2000-2001 to 2013-2014, the percentage of all K-12 public schools that had high percentages of poor and black or Hispanic students grew from 9 to 16 percent” (p. 2). These findings suggest that practices of racially and economically segregating students of color continue unresolved. Sadly, poverty and race are automatic disqualifiers for children of color to have equal access to quality
Since its beginning, the United States of America has gradually and steadily expanded the oversight and power of its own federal government. This expansion has resulted in a plethora of effects on the relationship between local state government and the federal government, both negative and positive. However, the increased impingement from the federal government onto the constitutional rights of local and state governments has created an imbalance. A major part of this imbalance has stemmed from the advent and imposition of unfunded federal mandates. This increasing implementation of unfunded federal mandates over the years has begun to stir up trouble between the states and the federal government.
American Government Research Paper The No Child Left behind Act is a United States Act of congress that is reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that included a Title 1 the government’s flagship aid program for disadvantage students. There is no reason that a child should be made an outcast cause of learning disabilities or other aspects of life. How does the Government expect for crime rates to go down if the generation of today cannot receive a good education because people dropping out of school.
Her excerpt was published in 2014. During the 2000s, up until today, there has been many debates and issues regarding the education system. Years before her excerpt was released, an act called No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind was passed in 2001. This act provided poor children educational assistance and ensured that every child would have an access to education. However, schools would be held accountable for students who are not achieving the expected level of academic success.
The State Legislature, State Administrative Agencies, and State and Local Board of Education help set up and carry on laws to control education in public schools. Individually, they represent their peculiar power when it comes down to making crucial decisions. The State Legislature has plenary, or absolute, power to make laws governing education compared to others who provide guidance and/or are locally administered (Cambron-McCabe, 2014). Responsibilities delegated to the Local Board from the State Board are taken care of differently in each state. Local School Boards hold the obligation to represent the state laws in education, however individual board members don’t have the authority to make policies or perform official acts on behalf of
The state of Texas has been in a constant struggle within itself over just how to evaluate education, and standardized testing in Texas has been a major influencer in terms of the state’s standards for over thirty years. Though these methods of testing have been utilized for decades, resentment to the tests have been continuously rising among educators, parents, and students, but not everyone agrees. Despite government officials trying to quell these protests with changes to administration, and the way the test itself is formatted and formulated, there seems to have been little to no improvement made and those opposing the tests have started calling for an end to all standardized testing. For one to truly understand this ongoing struggle, one must first look at standardized testing’s beginning, then how government today is trying to fix the broken system, and finally consider the opinions of notable figures in the testing world.
This shows that after this case study, it was established that US Citizens have the right to a K-12 education, one that is equally funded so that all students are learning on a level playing field. For this case study, the Texas Supreme Court established the right for students to receive a public school education Texas citizens have the responsibility to take action against an issue they find unconstitutional, either by voting or joining an interest group.
In recent years there has been a greater population of students in schools around America. Though there is an increasing number of students there has been a decrease in numbers of public schools. In Chicago, New York, Detroit and many other cities across the country we have seen schools on top of schools closing down which has impacted many stakeholders most importantly staff and students (Vogt, 2013). Questions are raised on where will the staff and students go, how will the students be affected by this closure and many other important questions. There seems to be various views on school closures and if they have positive or negative effect on different stakeholders.
Education Reforms Education reform is legislation to improve the quality of education in the United States. Once, grades were the most important achievement for students. However, politicians and the public were concerned that our standardized test scores were not as good as those of other countries. Therefore, state and national governments started making laws to make school more challenging and to test kids more. One of those laws was “No Child Left Behind”.