Things are always interpreted in different ways; it all depends on which side you are on. For example, to most Canadians, the United States is a country that reaches out and tries to prevent wars and terrorism. Others say they are nosy, can’t keep to their own business and start wars. Perspective changes everything, and Oliver Cromwell is no exception. Ever since he became Lord Protector of England there have been many interpretations of him. Some say he was an honourable hero while other say he is a vicious villain. Many Puritans and supporters believe he is a hero due to the fact that he abolished the monarchy, which was most despised at the time. He also won the civil war for the Roundheads, and although he was offered the crown, Cromwell refused because he had to intention to be a dictator like the King. …show more content…
But if you look at things from a much different perspective, Oliver Cromwell can also be seen as a notorious villain. When he became Lord Protector, he suppressed the rights of the Catholics and tried to force Puritanism among all. This included closing theatres, inns, restriction of sports and, strangest of all, nobody was allowed to work or play soccer on Sundays! Also while Catholics loved to indulge in food on Christmas day, Cromwell made it a day of
I think John Brown was a hero, because he tried to find ways to free slaves. Even though he killed people or got people killed in the process, he still was trying his best to help free slaves. Supplying the slaves with weapons was a good idea, but did not turn out they way he wanted. Everyone messes up, but he still had this plan to try and help free slaves.
These two men, stated above are one of the many which shifted a change in mind in England during and after the Glorious Revolution, which can be considered a part of the
He was successful, decent looking, a strong speaker, wealthy and a great leader. Without him, the United States might not be like it is today! As a matter of fact, we might not even be free of England right now. You never
Most people today believe he was a hero, but that is false. When British North America became a colonized country (Canada) they took over Rupert’s land and made it government-owned land where Louis Riel was living. William McDougall (who was the new governor of the area) did not like French people and did not want them on the land. Louis Riel disagreed with what William McDougall was doing. He had his men arrest members of the pro-Canadian faction who had resisted the provisional government.
Someone who does not know of Oliver Cromwell, would not know the significance of that attribute (19). Wills also quotes French-speaking figures in their native language, requiring the reader to at least have the ability to search the translation and meaning of the words
During the Boston Massacre five civilians were killed and six injured. Despite his unkindness towards the British Government he believed that the British soldiers should receive a fair trial. He defended the soldiers skillfully. Not only did was he a great lawyer he was also leading member of the Continental Congress. In 1774 he was elected as the representative of Massachusetts.
He rebelled because of him and many others, they felt it was the right thing to do. It was in not their intentions to displease or offend the government, they just wanted the rights that they were worthy of. So, to answer the question of was he a hero or a villain, he was both. Whatever anyone thinks of him,
When people are accused of a crime they didn’t commit, it often has lasting effects on them and their loved ones. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, he explores the Salem Witch trials with characters that are accused of a crime they clearly didn’t commit, and are sent to their death. In a similar fashion, the five adolescents who were accused and found guilty of a heinous crime in New York City were ultimately found innocent after they served years and had eliminated a chance of restoring their youth. In the Central Park Five court case that occurred in New York City during the late 1980’s, the idea that a hero is someone valiant is proven by Antron Mccray. In the play, the Crucible by Arthur Miller, it displays that a hero is honest based on
He played a major role in the American revolution, including his participation in the capture of the British garrison of Fort Ticonderoga (History.com), intervening in a British invasion of New York at the Battle of Lake Champlain (History.com), and his crucial role in bringing about the surrender of British General John Burgoyne’s army at Saratoga (History.com). Benedict Arnold was a good man who made a huge mistake in 1780. In my opinion Benedict Arnold was a great General, but he surrendered to the British and joined their side, and that’s where he went wrong. He was always a tough general who dove right in and fought for what was right. He was even a part of the Sons of Liberty.
In the end of the day he did everything for the Metis and I find that the big reason why he is a hero. Louis Riel should be seen as a hero because he stood up for the rights of the Metis to the Canadian government during the Red River Settlement. During
Oliver Cromwell was one of the main commanders leading the Parliamentarian forces against the Royalist forces during the English Civil War (22 August 1642 – 3 September 1651). He started his career as a lowly cavalry troop commander but through his tactical prowess, he was able to rise through the ranks until he became the commander of the New Model Army. At the Battle of Naseby, Cromwell led his wing with remarkable skill, routing the Royalist cavaliers and helping to thoroughly smash the remains of the Royalist army which led to their eventual surrender at Oxford in June of 1646. Following several other smaller conflicts including the Second English Civil War and the Irish and Scottish Campaigns, Cromwell was appointed the position of
Some view him as a hero whose ideals should be embraced, while others see him as an arrogant, stubborn, and reckless vagabond whose dreams led to his demise. With numerous opinions about who he was, it is up to the reader to choose their ideas of who he was. To me and many others
They also may think he was a hero because of how he fought against his enemies with strength and power. Yet, in my opinion, even though he has done all those great things all the negatives speak louder than the
Others, may think he could be seen as a hero because of the advances in technology that he encouraged. Not only that, but he could also be seen as a tragic hero. Though everyone has their own opinion, I personally believe that he is neither a monster or a hero. I could argue both sides and I have a very central
Cassius is often referred to as a villain in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. A villain is a play or stories antagonist. Traits of a villain include manipulative and untrustworthy. Cassius was a known companion of Caesar’s that was an active part in the assassination (Gaius). First of all, Cassius manipulates Brutus and the rest of the conspirators into helping him assassinate Caesar.