Firstly, soda contains big amount of sugar. In 12-ounce can of coke, there are about 39 grams of sugar, which is about 9 1/3 teaspoons (Coffman, 2013). This amount of sugar would transform to about 154 calories in human body. According to American Heart Association (AHA), limit for daily added sugars intake is 100 calories (about 6 teaspoons) for women and 150 calories (about 9 teaspoons) for men (Heart.org, 2014). It can be seen that only a 12-ounce can of coke transcend the maximum sugar permission level for a day.
As far as the obesity rates are concerned cheap processed food is a major contributor to obesity. For instance, when I go to the grocery store to buy food I always see discounts and deals for processed and pre-prepared food. And often these discounted “foods” are loaded with sugar (high fructose corn syrup, dextrose, and maltodextrin); I rarely see deals for healthy foods such as vegetables and fruit. A receipt from
They can argue that a ban on sugary drinks could help improve health problems such as obesity. Although it may seem reasonable like a reasonable solution, it can actually have negative effects on people. What good is a law when it can’t solve the issue it was made for. Therefore, the soda ban should not be put in place due to how it doesn’t solve the health problems it was made for. In the Washington times article by Samantha Gross, Joy Dubost, a nutritionist who works for the National Restaurant Association, explains what problems that limiting soda can cause.
A sugar tax or soft drink tax is a tax or surcharge on soft drink specific to the reduction of overall sugar consumption. In most forms the tax is designed to discourage the drinking of soft drinks, cordials, flavoured mineral waters and sports and energy drinks, with high levels of added sugar. The first reason I strongly believe that the sugar tax should be introduced is to address the quickly growing rate of obesity in Australia.
Research published in the British Medical Journal has found that the imposition of 10% tax on sugar-sweetened drinks in Mexico resulted in a 12% reduction in sales. From the success of soda tax in Mexico, we can see that tax is an effective method to reduce consumption. Although some beverage companies still use promotion and marketing strategies to counter the tax. For example, big companies start to develop new market in low or middle income classes. On average, consumers chose to cut back more and more as the year wore on.
This counters the idea provided in source A because it opens up the idea that there are other causes to the epidemic. Then comes the paradoxical part to this idea. Knowing that throwing down grocery stores won’t instantly solve the obesity problem, however, “all the knowledge and willpower in the world won't allow food-desert residents to choose healthy foods unless they also have access” (Source C). There
Obesity is one of the biggest health problems in America. There are many negative effects of obesity in today's society such as fast food restaurants, not enough exercise, poor eating habits and large portions. However, obesity can definitely be avoided and decreased. Ways obesity can be decreased is by promoting and educating people, especially children, about healthy eating habits, providing public policies that allow easy access to healthy, low-fat, high-fiber foods, trained healthcare professionals. First, in order to stop obesity, we need to advertise healthy plates, instead of advertising a lot of fast food restaurants.
It is not only control the marketing for producer on sugar-sweetened drinks, but also decrease the consumption by fat tax. According to the research on internet about tax and negative externalities, this is a best way to solve the public health challenge associated with the deterioration of the population’s dietary habits. Maybe it is difficult for government to change the daily habits, but the way to added fat tax is a kind of solution to maintain the condition of marketing. Because we can’t disregard that sugar-sweetened is detrimental to health. At the same time, it will bring a lot of negative affect for the marketing of sugar-sweetened drinks in a short term.
The UK has an ever-growing problem of obesity within the nation, especially within youths. The proposed solution to the problem Is a sugar tax however that is blatantly wrong. The only reason the tax has been passed by the government is to bring in more money to the UK, which is being promised to be spent within the health and education sectors. These areas are without a doubt in need of the expected 800 million pounds that the tax will bring in, however, the problem of obesity will still be there no matter how much the government decide to tax sugary drinks. In essence, the sugar tax on drinks in the UK is a feeble attempt to lower obesity rates.
Furthermore, the CDC says that there are three main causes of childhood obesity in the United States. The top three causes of childhood obesity is “Behaviors that influence excess weight gain include eating high-calorie, low-nutrient foods and beverages, not getting enough physical activity, sedentary activities such as watching television or other screen devices,