Overall, I would give Madison an “A” which means he was a very significant part of the constitution. I believe that he deserves this grade because he played a part in the whole process, not just one. He helped give ideas, take notes, compose, and even ratify the constitution. First of all, it it weren't for his ideas about how the government should run, we might have never had the three branches of government that we know of today. Also, if Madison have not taken the notes that he did, then the Constitution might not have the ideas that the delegates agreed upon in the past.
The United States confronted many problems once they gained their independence from Great Britain. One of the biggest problems was their form of government at that time, which was stated in the Articles of Confederation. This presented many problem to the states, as stated in a document about the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, some of the problems of the Articles of Confederation were the poor international trade, poor foreign relations, weak economy, and Shay’s Rebellion. The people, specifically the Federalists, wanted a new government because of the weakness of the government at that moment. According to many history books, the government also faced financial problems and tried to resolve them by taxing the states, because
In 1780, Hamilton began to exhibit his financial abilities. The war had reached a time where finances were short, so Hamilton anonymously brought forward his plan for the State Bank. (James T. White ' Company, Hamilton, Alexander, The H.W. Wilson Company) On May 14, 1787, Hamilton was selected and sent to the Constitutional Convention as New York’s delegate. He became frustrated by several of the proposals, but he signed the finished document and wanted others to do so too.
Many scholars believe that the French and Indian War was the turning point that led to a downhill spiral of the relationship between the American Colonies and Great Britain. After this war, the British were more strict on the colonies in many ways. Due to the firmness and unfair laws, many colonists grew upset and demanded that they have the rights of Englishmen. The British believed in a different form of representation, known as virtual representation, which was when someone from England represented the colonies in Parliament. But, the colonists believed in actual representation, which was when someone from the colonies would represent them in Parliament.
In this source, the impact of America’s founders, such as Patrick Henry, and the impact they have on modern America are discussed. The American Founders remain the most important authority for deciding if principles of the American government are legitimate even though time periods have changed. Their ideals in liberty are taken into account when laws are passed today. This resource is very useful in describing the impact of the speech. The speech makes liberty its priority and the source says that the founder’s ideals are in liberty.
Perhaps if Adams decided to go to war the history of the United States would have been very different. Adams is also remembered for his opinions on Republicanism, which introduced Republican ideas to the American government. However Adams is negatively remembered as a vain, eccentric, and stubborn man, and most of his cabinet and Congress believed he was unfit for president. This was evident when he lost his attempt at re-election to Thomas Jefferson and become the first president of the United States to serve 1 term. Despite these opinions Adams had a significant impact on American history and the formation of the United States into what it is
Different factors had a part to play in starting or even propelling ‘the Age of Enlightenment’, including the rule of the Church and State which experienced a power struggle among them, in addition to the Western discovery of latest societies with noticeably exclusive cultural traditions and norms. Many intellectuals felt unhappy with the fixed social styles amongst their very own collectives, and angry at their governments' refusal to provide non-public rights. The lasting political effect of the Enlightenment can't be overstated. At the least three fundamental political revolutions came about throughout this time period in Britain, America, and France. Those revolutions manifested thoughts centring on
He also assisted in the creation of the U.S. Constitution. “At the end of the convention, in September 1787, he urged his fellow delegates to support the heavily debated new document. The U.S constitution was ratified by the nine states in June 1788.” (“History”). Benjamin heavily debated with his fellow delegates before persuading them to decide to create the U.S. Constitution. Without Franklin, the Constitution may not have been
On September 17, 1787, The Philadelphia Convention emitted their own new constitution to the states for ratification. Instead, The Federalist profoundly accepted the Constitution for several reasons, which included that this new constitution allowed for higher and further central government, that was formerly undermined under the Articles of Confederation. In the other hand, The Anti-Federalist, did not want a authoritative and dominant central government, but instead, powerful state governments; in response to the new constitution, many of the Anti-Federalists began writing different essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists experiment at earning states to not rarify the Constitution, many federalists advanced a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the United States government was in shambles. Having left the rule of the British Crown, the States desired a government far from their previous predecessor. However, having given tremendous power to the states and very little to the federal, there was much chaos. A prime example of the failure of this document was Shay’s Rebellion, when farmers rebelled against government officials for debt that they could not repay due to faults in the Articles. Consequently, a new Constitution had to be ratified which resulted in many compromises between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
“Before the Constitution could become "the supreme law of the land," it had to be ratified or approved by at least nine of the thirteen states” (Costly, 2002). The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation introduced a great deal of interstate conflict, something that delegates, through the drafting of the Constitution, tried their best to solve. When the Founding Fathers signed the Constitution in 1787, it needed the ratification from nine states before it could go into effect. There were two sides to the Great Debate. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.
The constitution was signed and sent out to the states in 1787, but was not ratified until 1788. During this time in the states the constitution caused a great deal of controversy. While some, the Federalists, believed that a constitution is exactly what was needed, others, the Anti-Federalists, felt that a constitution severely needed a bill of rights. There are many reasons a bill of rights was included in the constitution. Although it was not in the first copy, it was promised to be in the next one if nine states would ratify it.
Sociology, Communication Studies, or Criminal Justice is what I’m considering for my major. I want to become journalist, writer, and jobs in advertising. I also don’t mind to have jobs that are related to Law Enforcement like being a Crime Scene Investigator or Correctional Officer. With Sociology degree, I could have both but I don’t want to decide right now because it’s a big decision to make so I will just pick the variety courses to see what fits me the best. 5.
This was the formation of the League of Nations. It was then presented to the Senate. This is where the conflict spoken of earlier arose. Although America had previously been committed to both a sense of mission and isolationism, they could not go hand in hand in this situation because they both supported a much different cause. • Sense of Mission: The Treaty of Versailles was a sense of mission or a goal that Wilson had for America by “making the world safe for democracy.” He had a strong desire to strengthen and improve other countries and in essence, the world.
The US faced several defeats by the British, who were in much debt by the end of the war. Eventually, relationships between British and the US improved. The Native Americans faced the worst consequences as a result of the war. They continuously faces white expansionism and they had no rights to defend their land. 11.