ipl-logo

Why a New American Constitution Should be Approved

771 Words4 Pages

After the Revolutionary War had come to an end, there were many challenges the thirteen colonies had to face. There were many economic, poverty, and social problems within the country. American citizens had a difficult time to adjust to the new national problems. It severely impacted them. These problems arose with a weak government established by the Articles of Confederation. Many Americans found that the Confederation needed to be revised. In 1787, at the Constitutional Convention, a New Constitution was made, but not all agreed. Due to this, there was a major debate among many people. In my opinion, I think the New Constitution should be approved. The first reason why I think the New Constitution should be approved is that the New Constitution …show more content…

For example, it says in Document 5, “ At least...give the proposal Constitution a fair trial, and mend it with time, occasion, and experience may [require].” This shows Americans shouldn’t judge the Constitution before hand, but still give it a chance. Even if Americans want to change the Constitution, they can. Moreover, it states in Document 5, “ Reflect that the [Constitution] comes recommended to you by men and fellow citizens who… love their liberty and their country.” This shows the Constitution was accepted by people that care about the citizens of America. The others that disagreed with approving the New Constitution are inaccurate because the constitution deserves fair judgment and suggested by respected authorities. This is why I think the New Constitution should be approved. A better way I can approve the New Constitution is to do a debate. Someone will support their argument with evidence and go first. Then, the other person will go. They will each go for 5 minutes and the judges will vote. The 3 judges will give their perspective on the topic. After, they will take a piece of paper and write who they vote for. Then, there will be a host that will open the votes. This is a better way I can approve the New

Show More
Related

  • Informative Essay: Supporting The Constitution

    444 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles had many weaknesses so we as americans had to create a stronger government to run our country on. I think the Constitution was a good idea for America because it fixed many of our country’s problems which were from the Articles of Confederation. The constitution gave us a national currency, gave us the bill of rights amendments, and made it so the powers were split equally between three branches. The ratification was good

    Read More

  • Us Constitution Outdated

    1367 Words  | 6 Pages

    The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil

    Read More

  • Ap Us History Dbq

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    If the new United States were to continue with the Articles of Confederation (articles that made states independent and also had a central government with little power) then the nation would dissolve. So, after many arguments, the constitution was made. This constitution gave rights, it gave liberty, and it gave freedom to all who had suffered under the British monarchy and it would keep people free for generations and generations to come. This key item made such significance because those who had suffered under corrupt ruling, by the British, were finally free, they finally could say something and use their god given right. And this constitution supported them, and gave them a life worth

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Change Under The Ratification Of The Constitution

    914 Words  | 4 Pages

    The move from the Articles of Confederation to the United States Constitution wasn't a consistent one, and settling the issues of the Articles of Confederation required a progression of protracted level-headed discussions both amid and after the convention. In any case, one thing was sure, something must be changed. Fifty-Five Delegates met at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to decide how best to change the current archive. The ratification of the constitution was very important to the states and I would vote to adopt the it. The constitution enabled and built up the Federal Government.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

    Read More

  • Constitution Dbq

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    From the failure of the Articles, should the new government, the Constitution, be approved? In 1788, the Constitution was created as the Articles of Confederation wasn’t successful and strong enough for their new government. During that time, a debate went throughout America about the Constitution whether to ratify it or not. Yes, the Constitution should be ratified because a Bill of Rights was promised, no one overpowered (in the government; checks and balances), and it is fair to both citizens and officials. Starting off, a bill of rights was promised which would ensure many things for the citizens.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists Dbq

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Document 2, the Constitution was not secure enough. The Constitution did not have restrictions put in place in order to prevent a political office from ruling for life. The possibilities of the U.S. government transforming into a monarchy were too high, making it ideal to not ratify the Constitution. Furthermore, the Constitution posed a threat to those less wealthy. Document 5 expressed the concerns of the people, stating, “These lawyers and men of learning, and monied men … make us poor illiterate people swallow down the pill”.

    Read More

  • What Are The Articles Of Confederation Failure

    376 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation couldn’t deal adequately with many problems that arose during the 1780’s. Some of the problems include National Security and Currency. On the other hand, The Articles of Confederation did have some admirable traits to it. Such as the Ordinances of 1787 and 1785. Though the Articles had some praiseworthy achievements, it did come with some major complications.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.

    Read More

  • Essay On Texas Constitution

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. endorse the U.S. constitution in 1789, much of the time has been utilized as a model by rising countries. A constitution is the basic law of a state or nation that outlines the primary structure and functions of government. State constitutions, nonetheless, sometimes appreciate such esteem. Most definitely, the constitution of the state of Texas is more frequently disparaged than applauded in view of its length, indefinite quality, and its obsolete, unworkable arrangements. The political conditions that encompassed the written work of the national constitution varied impressively from those that existed at the times when large portions of the fifty states were composing their constitutions.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Similarities

    421 Words  | 2 Pages

    To analyze the both sides of the articles, ¨The Articles of Confederation¨ and ¨The U.S. Constitution¨. They have many similarities and differences within the two. The U.S. Constitution was adopted in September 1787. The Articles of Confederation was adopted on November 15, 1777. The similarities between the two is that they both have a Congress that can make laws, as it says in ¨The Constitution of the United States of America¨ in article 1 it states ¨All making powers are given to a Congress¨.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Constitution And The Federalists

    663 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each party present during the drafting of the Constitution had their own ideas about what it should accomplish. As a result, it was very difficult to formulate a document that appeased all groups and parties, who often voiced their opinions of how it should be written. The U.S. Constitution was the father of many worries concerning the rights of the people, the role of government, and the balance between the aristocrats and poor, the government and the people. The Federalists, or supporters of the Constitution, were not completely satisfied with the task they were given. They were supposed to revise the old Articles of Confederation, but they felt like it needed to be completely rewritten.

    Read More

  • Justice Thurgood Marshall Analysis

    1324 Words  | 6 Pages

    Because of its vagueness, it will continue to adapt with the times. It can be determined that the Constitution was a good first step in the right

    Read More

  • Constitution Controversial Document

    211 Words  | 1 Pages

    Why was the Constitution a controversial document even as it was being written? Established in 1787 The Constitution was a controversial document because it was a document that could both solve the nation’s hardships and warped the Republican foundation. The Constitution on one hand would give the people a voice and the other would control the nation through a monarchy system. One of the controversies that arose from the creation of the Constitution was the question of management of commerce.

    Read More

More about Why a New American Constitution Should be Approved

Open Document