The Experience of WW1 on Australia’s home front led to all Australian men to enlist for war in support of Great Britain ‘the mother country’ meant Australia was at war. The Australian home front was affect due to many effects of WW1 such as, conscription, government power, Gallipoli .Conscription was called on in 1916 by prime minster Hughes, when the Australian army needs troops to fight in war, but there aren’t enough volunteers, he began conscription which is a law that says if you are able to fight, you have to fight. In 1916 prime minster Hughes suggested raising the numbers of Australian troops to maintain the full strength at the front line, by conscripting those who are unwilling or opposed to enlist in war. Conscription affected those …show more content…
There was a political debate over governments wish to bring in conscription. Many people had sons, bothers, husband fighting in the frontline knew there were a shortage of men and feared that this would lead to injuries or deaths of their loved ones. There were many pros and anti-conscription forces. The pro of conscription were that Australian units had very high causalities because they were often used as front line troops. Voluntary enlistment had dropped, but the Australian governments committed to the British government to maintain a substantial army. The government tried various tactics to increase the rates of recruitments, including lowering standards for enlistments and promoting propaganda to convince men that they should volunteer. The issues of conscription was opposed by the people and churches for several reasons. In Victoria the campaign was led by the Irish archbishop, Daniel Mannix. There 921,000 catholic in Australia at the time, most of these catholic were of Irish descent. The Irish Catholic Church also dominated the labour party and the labour movement. The views of church leaders were heard in parliaments and public debate. Other Australians developed an understanding of the horror of the conditions on the western front. In the end issues was decided by a referendum, which was put to the Australian public twice in October 1916 and …show more content…
Although the defeat, the bravery and sacrifices associated with the eight month struggle that had profound Australians views during this period. The first newspaper report on the Australian landing in Gallipoli was published. This created and audience of those who were, about Australian soldier’s reputation for being undisciplined, concerned that Australians behaved poorly during military engagements, wanted to see Australian at soldiers’ least equal effort to British troops. Pride in the Anzac’s showed propaganda poster. For nearly hundreds years Australians promoted the Anzac’s legend concept of Gallipoli as ‘baptism of fire’ and the Australian soldier at Gallipoli has created Australia’s national
They saw their friends, brothers, and men they worked with, die. World War one was split in many small wars. One of the battle that the Australians helped to fight was the battle of Fromelles. The battle of Fromelles was considered one of the worst battles in history. It only went on for 12th hours, but yet the 5th Australian Division
To be able to assist Britain and her allies compulsory enlistment or conscription had to be put in place. Sir Robert Laird Borden and William Lyon Mackenzie King led Canada during these times. Yet, both made a promise to their fellow countrymen upon the issue of conscription but when it was put place in effect,
Source A “Will you fight now or wait for this” has been created by the Commonwealth Government of Australia. This source is a poster from World War 1 and designed in 1918. The poster was created to persuade people from Australia, especially men between the ages of 18 and 35 to fight against the Triple Alliance, and to also prevent the German Empire from invading Australia. Additionally, Source A would be useful to a historian studying the impact of propaganda on the Australian society during World War 1. This source would be useful because it depicts the outcome of Australia, If no troops from Australia were ordered to fight against the German Empire, nevertheless It also shows the experiences and impacts directed towards the civilians after
As soon as war was declared on Germany, both the prime minister of Australia at the time, Joseph Cook, and the Opposition Leader, Andrew Fisher, fully pledged their support for Britain in their involvement with the war. Australia was very much under the influence of Britain, so for many men enlisting was a way in which they could prove their loyalty. At the beginning of the war countries such as France, Russia, Austria-Hungary and Germany had very large armies of 1 million but Britain only had 250, 000. Of these 250, 000 Britain was only able to send 125,000 over the English Channel to fight.
How did Conscription and the rise of the protest movement affect the lives of Australians in the Vietnam War? The Vietnam War started 1 November 1955 and ended 30 April 1975. 60,000 Australians participated in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was the longest twentieth century conflict.
The Gallipoli Campaign Why did I choose this question for my essay? I chose this topic for my essay as the Gallipoli Campaign was a significant event in Australia’s history which extensively affects the national identity of our country. I wanted to research more in depth of the outcome and the events which lead to the process of forming the campaign itself. I also wanted to focus on the failed series of attempts and how it affected Australia’s national identity. By choosing this as my topic question, I will expand my personal knowledge and understanding of the Gallipoli Campaign.
During World War 2 the Australian prime minister, John Curtin, called on America for help. This speech will present evidence to prove the hypothesis: the social benefits of the Americans being deployed in Australia outweigh the negative social impacts. This will be done by addressing 3 main focus questions. These questions are: when and why did the American troops come to Australia? How did the Australian society benefit from the American presence?
The Australian Labour Party was one group that opposed war. The reason the party opposed the war was because they believed that Australia should not get involved as the war was essentially a civil one. Trade unions were another group that strongly opposed war. They believed that the Australian government was sacrificing Australian troop’s lives so that American would spend money in Australia and boost the economy. They called the foreign policy ‘blood for dollars’ or ‘diggers for dollars’.
World War I had been a very hard time for Canada and all the soldiers involved in it. It was difficult to keep a steady stream of new soldiers, so numbers were very low. This is why Robert Borden, the prime minister of Canada at the time, decided it was only right to introduce conscription to Canada. This decision had both negative and positive impacts on Canada. Conscription benefitted the soldiers, and Canada’s army, at war, and helped women gain independence and some rights, but the conscription had an extremely negative impact on Farmers.
The upsurge of World War Two forced the Australian Government to create and enforce ‘The National Security Act’, passed 1939, to actively defend themselves from the horrors of War. With the passing of the Act came new introduced laws that gave the Federal Government greater powers to respond to the threat of war. These greater powers included censorship and propaganda, the Internment of ‘enemy aliens’ (German, Italians and Japanese) and the banning of societies that opposed the War (these were communist parties of Australia and Jehovah’s witnesses). The Act served well in defending Australia for the time it was implemented, though, with passing time there were impacts causing effects on the Australian citizens during. These impacts varied from
Approaching the end of the 1915, Australian experienced a leadership change. The prime minister at that time, William Hughes was a support of Conscription. Conscription means a compulsory enlistment for state service, typically into the armed forces ( the army ). However, the majority of people in the Labor Party did not support conscription and therefore caused conflict.
Introduction Peter Weir’s Gallipoli is based on the historical events from World War One in 1915, in Gallipoli. World War One started on the 28th of July 1914 and continued until the 11 of November 1918, the movie is set in 1915 from about the start of the year until 7th of August 1915 when the Battle of the Nek took place. This essay will discuss the accuracies and inaccuracies of the film Gallipoli compared to the events of World War One in 1915. The accuracies and inaccuracies of how the war started and who started World War One will be examined along with life in the trenches and the Australian attitudes to the war and the propaganda.
There were many casualties on the Western Front, conditions were challenging, and Australia was involved in multiple battles. Lives were lost on the Western Front because of bombardment and sickness. On the Western Front, lots of blood was spilt and sickness was common. People may say that Gallipoli was more important than the
This is evident when author of Images of Australian History, Nicholls, G., stated that some people enlisted for “…more a sense of adventure and an opportunity to travel than patriotism…” and the “…greatest opportunity for a chap to make a man of himself…” (Nicholls,G., 1994, 181-182). Nicholls also corroborates with the Australian War Memorial in the fact that not all Australians enlisted purely in the thought of defending the ‘Mother Country’, which is made clear in an extract from a letter by Robert Edmund
These few factors play a huge role in why I disagree with conscription. When the idea of conscription was passed and men were forced to fight in the war this took away the freedom of many.