Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War
On the 28th of April 1965 Prime Minister Robert Menzies announced that Australian troops would be sent to fight in the Vietnam War. There was a great divide in Australian society over this decision as many people supported the decision and many people opposed it. However as the war went on and became the longest war Australia was ever involved in, more and more people joined the opposing side and joined the Moratorium movement (an anti-war movement.) When Menzies first made the announcement that they were sending Australian troops to Vietnam there was a lot of support from different groups. The Liberal Party were one group that rallied behind Menzies and supported his decision. Although in the Senate
…show more content…
The Australian Labour Party was one group that opposed war. The reason the party opposed the war was because they believed that Australia should not get involved as the war was essentially a civil one. Trade unions were another group that strongly opposed war. They believed that the Australian government was sacrificing Australian troop’s lives so that American would spend money in Australia and boost the economy. They called the foreign policy ‘blood for dollars’ or ‘diggers for dollars’. Another group opposing the war were universities. The students first reaction to the announcement was mixed as some people supported war and some didn’t. At first the students who opposed the war had a cautious approach and mainly protested by sending open letters to newspapers, encouraging the government to negotiate with Viet Cong and North Vietnam. However when conscription was introduced the students really began to come out in force against the war. As the war went on, the wider community also had a lot of opposers, even though majority of the community were supporters at first. Anti-war demonstration began in the month between the announcement and the deployment of the troops in Vietnam. Wives of deployed soldiers sent out angry letters, gave angry phone calls and the departure date had to be kept a secret in order to avoid an angry scene or protests. At first there was not much opposition however as the war progressed more people switched from supported the war to opposing
After enduring the past three decades encompassing two world wars and economic depression, Australians sought peace and security in the post-war era. Although this new era had brought both economic and political stability, Australians continued to live feeling vulnerable and fearful.1 From 1949-1966, Robert Menzies lead Australia through the post-war era as his second term as Prime Minister and became the longest-serving Prime Minister in Australian history2 as the leader of the conservative Liberal Party. During Menzies' second term he held strong priority on eliminating the communist influence in the union movement and believed that this goal could only be achieved by abolishing the Communist Party. In October of 1950, he kept true to his election pledge and The Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth) was passed into law by Parliament, making the Communist Party and affiliated bodies illegal.2 In the words of the Bill, a communist was 'a person who supports or advocates the objectives, policies, teachings, principles or practices of communism, as expounded by Marx and Lenin’.3
1) A spate of anti-war activism occurred across the Le Moyne campus during the years of the Vietnam War from the late 1960s into the early 1970s. Such activism included protests against the Kent State shooting and against President Nixon and anti-draft demonstrations. Still, the Le Moyne community wasn’t entire unified behind the anti-war movement. There is a tendency to caricature college campuses during the Vietnam War as having a unified, passionate anti-war movement across the entire campus. In reality, however, not everybody in the Le Moyne community supported the anti-war activism; some viewed the protests as un-patriotic and unnecessarily subversive.
The soldiers in the Vietnam war hated their involvement and many questioned why the united states stepped in the first place. According to Robert Peterson, “I guess I’m fighting for the continued freedom and prosperity of America. But then when i think about it, that doesn 't make much sense either….. To stop communism here or they’ll eventually take over America. That’s a bunch of… bullshit!
While there were divisions in Australia along class and religious lines, as well as competing visions for the future of the young nation, at first Australians were overwhelmingly united in response to the war. Politically, normally divided political parties united in the face of the crisis. Then Liberal Prime Minister Joseph Cook publically committed 20,000 troops and funds to the cause, opposition leader Andrew Fisher declared that Australia would defend the Empire “to the last man and the last shilling”, and, in December 1914, the War Precautions Act pass through parliament with “little overt dissent”, according to Joan Beaumont. But it was not only within the political arena that support for the war effort was strong. With few exceptions, newspapers across the country reported a growth in patriotic sentiment, with individuals wearing emblems of England and France and the national anthem being played at nightly cultural events.
The cold war was a silent conflict between the East and West; a war based on being threatened by different ideologies. The world was hungry for power, to make their nation superior to one another. The cold war and Australia’s involvement has a large chapter in the books of history; political manipulation to increase Australia’s position of power. This essay will outline the motivation in the Australian political positions to aid the Unites States; the reason Australia joined in the Cold War. Using the Parliamentary Debate by Sir Robert Menzies, and then the newspaper entry by Australian ambassador Allan Renouf.
During World War 2 the Australian prime minister, John Curtin, called on America for help. This speech will present evidence to prove the hypothesis: the social benefits of the Americans being deployed in Australia outweigh the negative social impacts. This will be done by addressing 3 main focus questions. These questions are: when and why did the American troops come to Australia? How did the Australian society benefit from the American presence?
The ANZUS treaty between Australia, New Zealand and United states allowed the 3 nations to co-operate military operations in the pacific ocean, this was significant for Australia as it placed America as its major ally and provided Australia with military support in case of invasion. As a result of ANZUS Australia had to commit forces to Vietnam to support the American troops, this was a major reason for Australia’s involvement in the war. The war started to look bleak in Vietnam and Menzies had the melancholy duty of announcing conscription in 1964, Menzies stated, “Communist aggression in Indochina directly threatens Australia’s security” he continued to say that conscription was required to rally enough soldiers to fight in Vietnam. In all Australia ‘s main reason for involvement in the Vietnam War included; eradication of communism in Indochina and Indonesia, Ensuring Americas continued allegiance with Australia through means of militaristic support, to honour its SEATO and ANZUS commitments as well as Australia’s consecutive leaders during the Vietnam War era having strong distaste for communist ideals all played a major role for Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.
Shocked and shaken by the Japanese Empire’s plans and attempts to seize control of the continent in WWII, Australians understood and feared their close proximity to Communism’s spread throughout Asia. Many Australians felt that the situation was a grave matter for the future prospects of Australia’s geopolitical standing and felt that a need to ‘draw the line’ as to how far Communism clutches could spread through the Asia-Pacific region. This doctrine of ‘Forward Defence’ (dealing with the enemy before the got too close for comfort) was highly perpetuated by anti-communist, Liberal Prime Minister Robert Menzies. These various geopolitical and trans-societal factors all play a significant role in the development of Australian military-policy and public opinion throughout the Vietnam War period. These fears and concepts may sound quite brash and juvenile from our hindsight-based, contemporary perspective, but for many Australians then, time to intervene was simply running
Which made some citizens furious that they continued getting lied to again and again. The war was not at all like what the government was letting us know at the time. The number of troops that were being drafted increased. The chart in document 1 demonstrate the expansion in contribution the US had in the war. It demonstrates that toward the finish of 1965 there were just 184,00 troops however before the finish of 1968 there were 537,000.
Source 1 - Vin Cosgrove Reasons for Australia’a Involvement in the Vietnam War: Australian troops went to train Vietnam to be able to fight their own wars We are currently reliving history because of current troops being sent to Iraq. The war was related to reasons of WWII, Australia was under serious attack and isolated (venerable to invasion) Germany, Italy and Japan were our enemies
Not only the war had a massive effect on the Indigenous in Australia, The war was a huge boom to the Australian economy and as it turned out another massive factor. As many Australian fundamental products were purchased as could be produced, and secondary, subsidiary industries manufactured many ‘modern’ items for the services. Many men and women retired and fled their careers to accompany the armed forces leading to a ‘deficit’ of labour. New commerce and businesses need to have been created to fund the troops with combat weapons, uniforms and ammunition. Scarce goods needed to be controlled by the Australian Government in enhancing better buying and selling and in ensuring that everyone received a fair share.
Introduction Peter Weir’s Gallipoli is based on the historical events from World War One in 1915, in Gallipoli. World War One started on the 28th of July 1914 and continued until the 11 of November 1918, the movie is set in 1915 from about the start of the year until 7th of August 1915 when the Battle of the Nek took place. This essay will discuss the accuracies and inaccuracies of the film Gallipoli compared to the events of World War One in 1915. The accuracies and inaccuracies of how the war started and who started World War One will be examined along with life in the trenches and the Australian attitudes to the war and the propaganda.
The antiwar movement against Vietnam was the most significant movement of its kind in the United States history. It had such a strong impact that people acknowledge the antiwar movement to be the reason the Vietnam War was shortened. The main purpose of the antiwar movement was to keep the issue known to the public. The activist constantly made the public aware of the events of the Vietnam War and wanted them to question whether the United States should be involved. National and local groups attracted the greatest publicity, but most of these efforts took place at the locally.
Finally, by 1939, Australians were questioning the validity to support and defend the 'Mother Country ' at all costs. These are just three of the World War II experiences that helped shape the nation. The response of Australia to the declaration of World War II was different and less
The big failure America in the Vietnam War is the shameful history of tragic scene for arrogant American, whose pain is still difficult to ease. The crucial event also had a profound impact on today 's international situation. It is believed that the failure included political, economic, military and cultural background and other aspects, which are that common. When it comes to the controversial subject, I hope to put forward some fresh views from where I stand. 1.