Making a bill for prosecuting a cyberbully would go against the first amendment, which gives freedom of speech. According to the article, “Sacrificing the First Amendment to Catch Cyberbullies”, “Children should be educated to manage and avoid offensive situations on the Internet. If the child in question can’t handle that, they should not use the Internet”. Children should not be on the internet if they can’t handle all the comment, but its not as easy for some kids to do that because in this generation children are “glued” to their phones so it makes it hard for some people to give it up and a person should not be limited to do things because of another person’s actions, the cyberbully should be held accountable for the potential harm they could have caused and the restrictions that they put on that
Therefore, I believe my knowledge on the topic and ideas to fix it is justified. While doing an array of other projects on the misuse of drugs, I have learned that statistics show that students do not decrease their drug usage because of screenings. They simply begin to feel targeted and that they are guilty before proven innocent. With that being said, students become afraid to be removed from their extracurricular which then leads to very dangerous drug experimenting and binge drinking. Teenagers will find ways around passing the tests and would benefit more from realistic, informative activities.
It is true that young minds are very impressionable, but also a faulty statement in saying one could control the perception of a child 's mind by mere removal or prevention of information. Truth will always remain the same, and if the governing bodies or authorities feel that hiding it would help the society in general, then they are downright wrong. But in saying that there should be complete elimination of censorship, is also a flawed idea, because even though it is a powerful tool, it can also be misused. Freedom of speech should not be mistaken with freedom to hurt or insult, the factor of respect for other people is very crucial in the case, but in saying so, it doesn’t mean there should be restriction on the voices of people, because, the topic is all about one’s perspective and it is very
It can bring something good for the parents like knowing that their son or daughter is not involved in drug use. Drug testing also helps in schools and in the society. It lets the school officials and the government officials if the teenagers are getting involved in drug use. If they knew that their teenagers are involved in drug use, they can easily help them to recover. Although drug testing has advantages, it also has some disadvantages.
Many people think that these games will not have a major impact in a student or teens life that teens will be more prepared to face the real world an all its dangerous. But I say that yes these games might teach kids that the real world isn 't always that safe but I believe that these games show kids to be violent and reckless. To conclude this is why many parents and government officials believe that kids should not be allowed to play violent role playing games.By not letting kids play these games we can prevent more horrible and tragic shooting involving
Child Soldiers should not be prosecuted, but should be rehabilitated. These are all the reasons why these children should not be prosecuted. Why I think these children needs to go to rehab is because that they are too young and they are not even mature enough. People who prosecute Child Soldiers Might be insane furthermore, children are not even an adult they might be influenced by drugs and think it is good. unless you are an adult, then you may need to be prosecuted, other than that children are too young to go to rehab and needs to understand life.
Although plastic surgery could help teenagers become prettier physically and improve self-esteem mentally, the potential risk of undergoing cosmetic surgery should not be neglect. Besides, teenagers who want to undergo plastic procedures may not consider deeply since they are usually initiate by mass media and celebrities with good appearance. They are not mature enough to make decision with unexpected drawbacks. Another factor is that teenagers should be protected. Not only government should illegalize teenage cosmetic procedures to shoulder the responsibility, teenagers should be protected in order to prevent them facing the surgery accident or even stopped the happened of tragedy.
Censorship can be quite a debate when it comes to being needed or not needed.It is being used all around the world for various reasons. Many believe it is best for the country,while others see it as a gross violation.Censorship is needed to keep inappropriate and dangerous information from those that do not need access to the information. Children and adults both can be affected when censorship is not used.There are multiple different way both kids and adults are being influenced when not controlled information is easy to access.Inappropriate content can lower and affect the self-esteem of growing kids.There are ways that we can improve on the use of censorship.Children are more vulnerable to inappropriate content.Easy access information can disappoint children and cause stress and strain to their emotions.Advertising on the internet can cause expectations and demands of expensive materials.Many Advertising can be inappropriate and lead to the usage of more inappropriate content.”The difference between a child and a adult is that children are more vulnerable to the effects of everything from sunburn and alcohol to ideas and images...Children have the greatest preponderance of idea,opinions,values”(Sigman). More importantly the risk of a child meeting a paedophile online if not censored from the source. Censorship does have pros and cons,but the pros over throws the cons for good reasons.
Your child can be a role model to younger children by staying drug free and setting good examples. Isn't that what all parents want? I sure would! Drugs are very unhealthy and can cause death if intervention or prevention is not put into effect. Why would any parent not support preventing their child from harming their body if given the option to?
I believe sheltering children from violent media with the fear of them becoming violent or desensitized is the wrong thing to do but we should educate our children on the difference between right or wrong then exposing them to something that fake Therefore Gerard Jone doesn’t prove that violent media is actually good for children. Although people need to know and realize what actually doing to their child. He use logos in his article to convince his reader of his side of the argument. For example, he use a trouble girl that uses rap music for inspiration in expressing herself. He makes a point that nobody should ever deny a child to express themselves in any way
Even though the DARE program has positive outcomes other than deterring children from drugs and gangs. The program is considered ineffective because it does not deter children. What is the Purpose of D.A.R.E? The DARE program is intended to help deter school aged children from using and