Juveniles should be tried as adults due to being aware of their crimes and having an intention to kill, however, brain development and maturity can play a role into the reason why teens kill. With being tried as an adult juveniles should be granted the opportunity of freedom pending on their rehabilitation status and if requirements are not met, convicts will have to complete the remainder of their sentence. People have long argued that juveniles who commit a murder should not be tried as an adult due the juvenile not being aware of their crime. Awareness, as defined by the Webster Dictionary, is “the knowledge and understanding that something is happening or exists”. Having the perception to comprehend the occurrence of an event is not a dumbfounded characteristic. Therefore, when a person argues that a juvenile was not aware of their crime is a discrediting claim. In 1990 in the city of Chicago, a couple expecting their first child were murdered in cold blood in the hands of a juvenile teen. The teen shot both the husband and the wife who pleaded for their lives and the life of their unborn child. Author of “Juvenile Justice Information Exchange”, Jennifer Jenkins states, “He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his ‘thrill kill’ that he just wanted to ‘see what it would feel like to shoot someone’”. This killer was aware of his crime and was aware of who his victims were due to planning the murders months before. Brain chemistry or brain growth did not
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The author McCrea writes the article “Juveniles Should Not Be Tried in Adults Courts” and the author Estudillo writes “Juveniles Should Be Tried….” both argue if minors should be tried as adults. Estudillo asserts “ A kid who gets out of juvenile detention for murder will most likely commit another crime when he or she is out. Estudillo also argues that, Even if he or she is still a minor under 21 they still need to pay the price for what they did. So that means the minor is charged with first degree murder.
After a series of other crimes, he planned the murders for months, carefully and privately” (Jenkins). This shows how kids are not mentally disabled, in fact they are very intelligent. In this case, it is the parents fault for not raising the kid properly. The parents fixed every problem the child had. Kids need other type of attention.
They should know that murdering for any reason is wrong, there are other ways to solve things. Some people argue that teens shouldn't be sentenced to life in prison because they are still young and can mature. Their is no real way to know if these teens that committed these crimes have matured. Studies show that teens brains are not fully developed until the age of
Since a juvenile’s brain is still forming, many perform reckless acts due to their limited impulse control, decision-making, and judgement. Juveniles who commit crimes and receive life without parole should be able to have a second chance in society because teens make mistakes due to their impulse control and should not be punished for the rest of their lives for one mistake. Juveniles should be rehabilitated for the actions they do instead of
In 1999, a kid of the name Miriam was charged as an adult for fatally stabbing 55 year old Rosemarie Knight. Kids can do some pretty stupid things especially teenagers, but how often do these stupid things become illegal and what can we do to stop it? Kids of the ages ten through seventeen have shown to be doing more and more illegal acts over the years and it will only get worse if their is no change in our juvenile crime laws. These juveniles are a threat to the public and if our government keeps babying them as if they are just clueless kids who don’t know any better then frankly, more people will become injured from these delusional and mentally unstable children. Juveniles from the age of ten and seventeen should be tried and punished as adults.
We see how juveniles are a big part in law enforcement today. How they are treated differently than adults who are in prison. We looked at why troubled youths commit crimes and end up in juvenile detention centers. How we aid them and try to rehabilitate them in the process. People 's views play a big role in juvenile justice though, a lot of people are for juveniles being tried as adults.
In the United States, there has been a lot of juveniles that have been subjected in jail with life without parole. In the United States there is a total amount of 200,000 juveniles that enter the adult criminal-justice system every year. Some family members of the juveniles that are in prison find that leaving them in jail for life with parole is a bad idea. In my opinion I think that the juveniles should have subjected to life without parole so they wouldn’t be in the streets causing more chaos or just serious problems in general. In Pennsylvania, there is a lower limit for the age someone can be charged as an adult with adult homicide.
Teenagers are more than capable of committing heinous crimes contrary to their perceived youth. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court in a split decision decided that juveniles who committed murder could not be given life sentences because it violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In other words, the majority believes that juvenile murderers can’t be sentenced to life because it is inconsiderate of their youth and immaturity as well as the environment they grew up in. On the other hand, the minority believes that juveniles who commit heinous crimes should be sentenced to life in prison because not only does it reflect the will of American society, but it also prevents them from having the chance of being released back into it. Though I concede that an abusive or manipulative environment could have influenced their decision to purposely end someone’s life, I still agree with the minority that, to protect our society from their atrocity, juveniles should be given life sentences for murder.
How young is "old enough" to be an adult criminal? Being tried as adults exposes these juveniles to state penitentiaries and sentences up to life in prison without parole. But is this really effective? Do these kids have the capacity understand the crimes they are committing? Is there something or someone behind the acts of these young offenders?
The brain is still in a developing stage when these juveniles commit these crimes not until the age of 14 do these, immature and criminal children realize what they are doing. A child’s brain completely different from an adult's, a child can be influenced into doing something, compared to an adult who knows right from wrong and still decides to do
They absolutely do have a functioning brain that should clearly know that what they are doing is wrong. For example, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore said, “ During their adolescent years, their gray matter decreases and their decision making process is not functioning correctly” (Blakemore). Blakemore is a neuroscientist who studies the development and function of the nervous system, in my opinion, Blakemore is saying that we have no say in our actions due to the fact that we have a loss in gray matter. Regardless, this does not excuse the fact that we are still conscious of our own actions and that we decide whether or not to do bad or good things. Juveniles should be tried as an adult because they have the capacity to be in full control of their own
Prison Reform Essay In the book Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve was on trial for being a look out for a robbery that ended in murder. The book followed him during his time in prison, his protection and recorded his experience. It told about the struggles of being a teen in prison, but being tried as an adult. Through the book and later articles, many discussions came up.
Juveniles that have committed grave crimes should be charged as an adult. Although it is argued that their minds have not fully developed, it should not act as a reason to lessen their punishment. Minors should be able to differentiate between right and wrong, and must hold responsibility for their ultimate decision. Grave crimes that juveniles cause will also affect the victim’s family and friends.
For the past years there has been a debate on whether juveniles should be tried as life without parole or life with parole. In my opinion juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence to life without parole. Although the juveniles are underage they are well informed of what’s right and what’s wrong, but some of them have difficulty understanding of what they are doing at the moment of the crime because they are angry and act before thinking clearly. I agree with the majority of supreme court justices who believe that mandatory life sentences are unconstitutional, unfair and inhumane because juveniles are immature, their brain is not completely developed, and they are unaware of long term impact
Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.