Juvenile Justice On June 25, 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that any minor who commits a crime, even one as horrendous as murder will not be sentenced to life in prison. I do not feel that black and white rule such as this, have any place in sensitive situations such as homicide cases. There are many circumstances where kids who commit a crime should not have to rot away in prison, then other cases where that seems like the most appropriate punishment. Each case should be looked at individually and every factor accounted for and taken into consideration. In the article “ One punishment and a teen killer” by Jennifer Jenkins, she shares a traumatic part of her past when her youngest sister and brother in-law were brutally murdered by a teenager [2]. He was planning a multitude of murders he wanted to commit, evidence showed that killing was a …show more content…
Being sentenced to 18 years in prison, many rules and guidelines were overlooked when she was sentenced not taking into consideration of her the severe abuse she was subjected to for so many years. Kruzan knew she had been wronged and fought nonstop to get herself and her story heard, letting the world know that she is being punished for being a victim. In prison doing all she can to help others like her. She was finally released and still trying to get justice for others like her. Her story isn't just about juvenile justice, it also shows just how much of a rape culture we live in and are clearly comfortable living in. When a child says they feel unsafe how dare we question them, when a child says they got raped how dare we ask them “but really?” Kruzan will never live a day of her life without remembering how for so many years she was
Roper v. Simmons After reviewing several different opinions regarding the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Roper v. Simmons case, I agree with their final decision. There are many pros and cons when it comes to condemning a juvenile to death row or life imprisonment without parole. I believe that each case is unique and the penalty should depend upon the severity of the crime and how it was committed. In addition, an individual’s age, mental health status and genetics need to be considered when sentencing an appropriate punishment. In Simmons case, I think that he knew exactly what he was doing at the time when he murdered Mrs. Cook.
There were many problems address in the video that has lasting affects on not only the victim, but also the victim’s family. One of the main reasons why this video was called sentencing the victim was essentially because every year Joanna and her family had to travel from Charleston, South Carolina to Columbia, South Carolina to each offender’s parole board. This sentenced her family and her in numerous ways such as, having to relieve that moment every time it was time to go to these parole boards. The drive to Columbia from Charleston is at least two hours, so I can only imagine how she felt throughout the ride. Another way Joanna and her family was victimized by going to these parole boards was just the thought that these offenders may be released one day, could put her on edge.
The debate is based on the interpretations of the following cases: Roper v. Simmons Graham v. Florida 3 Both cases held that minors can not be sentenced to life except if they committed a homicide.
“Count one, guilty, first-degree murder. Count two, guilty of felony murder. Count three, guilty of especially aggravated robbery. ” This is the verdict Cyntoia, a teen victim of sex-trafficking, got on August 25th, 2006.
Under these circumstances people need to go through the pain and heartache to forgive and absolve someone, this is why this story galvanizes me. It shows me that everyone that everybody is not the bad guy. He didn’t mean to shoot her, instead of punishing Jordyn even more, Ms. Ady forgave him. She didn’t just help herself, she saved Jordyn’s life. Ms. Ady supplicated that Jordyn would have a lighter sentence.
The history of “the United States recognizes Curtis Fairchild Jones as the youngest criminal to have been convicted of murder” (Jet, 199). Together with his elder sister, Curtis Fairchild Jones planned the murder of their father’s 29-year-old girlfriend, Sonya Nicole Speights, for what the police described as jealousy and completion for the love of their father. Curtis Fairchild Jones and his 13-year-old sister were very close and one another’s confidante. After their case, Curtis Fairchild Jones and his sister pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and were sentenced to 18 years imprisonment in addition to lifetime probation. Their convicts were taken to juvenile correction centers to serve their respective jail terms.
Children should be treated, in the eyes of the law, the same as adults for crimes. Jessica Reaves wrote an article on March 12, 2012; Reaves’ article titled “Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?” Reaves explores the idea of juvenile committed crimes. Although just children, they are getting harsh punishments. People will argue the fact that these crimes were committed by a child.
Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.
In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).
Most of the teens in this documentary faced abuse such as mental, physical, and sexual abuse. Though what these teens did was horrific, it was understandable. Many of these kids were pushed past their breaking point, causing them to snap. This documentary shows that most of these teens did not kill out of cold blood, but out of fear. In fact, 59% of juveniles who receive life without parole the crime they committed was their first crime ever (Second Chance 4 Youth, 2016).
When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).
I would have never expected to read something even remotely similar to the events explained in this rollercoaster of an article, but not surprised, which saddens me to say. I will never understand how someone, much less a teenager, can commit such a felony without remorse. I pray for the families who are being forced back into the media as past occurrences are once again brought into the light and hope that they will soon find
The criminal case I have selected for this assignment is on Justin Morton; who at the age of fourteen years old Morton was the first youth convicted of first-degree murder section 231 CC. Although, The report show that the young man was raised in a healthy and supportive home with his mother and father. In spite of this, Justin expresses to his psychiatrist his impulse and desire for inflicting pain on others; he claims to have no remorse for the murder of Eric Levrack. Not to mention, He also voiced to former classmates that "Eric was annoying, always invading his space. "As a matter of fact, after the killing on April 1, 2003, Morton had turned himself in, he described the event as an open game of trust just before he strangled Eric with a belt.
Juveniles Justice Juveniles who are criminals being sentenced to life without parole can be shocking to some people. I believe if a juvenile is able to commit a crime, then they are able to do the time. The article “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” talks about how the brain can be different from the time you are teens to the time you are an adult. After, considering both sides on juvenile justice it is clear that juveniles should face life without parole because they did the crime so they can do the time. Also I believe the juvenile’s age should not influence the sentence and the punishment give.
Erin Caffey was an example of horrific crimes committed by children. Erin Caffey planned and helped execute the murders of her entire family. The cause of this was because she wanted to go out with her boyfriend but her parents stood in the way. As a result, Erin made her boyfriend and his friend took action. They killed Erin’s mother, stabbed her 8 year old brother Tyler repeatedly, and shot Matthew, her 13 year old brother.