ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis On A Woman's Right To Vote By Susan B Anthony

1086 Words5 Pages

Women’s right activist, Susan B. Anthony fought for women’s rights during the 1800’s and in her speech On A Woman's Right to Vote, she expresses her anger on the inequality woman experienced. Anthony’s purpose was to not only establish equality between men and women but simple voting rights for women. She embraces a stern and aggressive tone in her speech in order to accomplish her persuasive technique. Firstly, Anthony addresses the crime she had been accused of, which was the illegal casting of her vote. She states that the crime she is being accused of is not relevant because of the natural rights she beholds as a citizen of the United States. Anthony points out that no one and no state has the right to deny her of her individual freedom …show more content…

As well as Anthony’s appeal to logical information and basic human rights, she continues her speech using scare tactics as a way of persuasion. She wanted people to react with anger and a motivation to change the way things were. Anthony accomplished this with the use of rhetorical devices in her speech. One she used is repetition, Anthony continuously repeats the type of government women were facing. She called it an “odious aristocracy, a hateful oligarchy of sex, and so on. Anthony also identifies that the better educated ruled over the less, and the richer governed the poor. She wanted to not only seek justice for women but for every minority. She also wanted to show the ways of the corrupted government. “...this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe…” (lines 22-23 ). The use of parallelism is evident and is used to contrast the American democracy to reality, which was the glorification of men that led to the unjust privileges women received. This rhetorical device creates for a strong impact on her audience, people did not want to hear that their government was flawed

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Triangles By Mary Ann Shadd Cary

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the first paragraph she stresses the point that her readers need a voice. She makes it seem like a simple necessity with her rhetorical question when she asks, "Is not that plain?" on line 15 after stating the need for a voice in the country. She creates a feeling of urgency when she says, "To be always at the mercy of the demagogue of the hour is neither safe, dutiful, nor in any sense becoming" on lines 10-12. This makes the audience afraid and the feeling that they need a voice now.

    Read More

  • How Did Susan B Anthony Get The Right To Vote

    470 Words  | 2 Pages

    The rights that all citizens have were ensured by the constitution and therefore they cannot be denied by a law pass by the state. Anthony assured that a law that takes away women’s rights to vote because of their gender is a “violation to the supreme law of the land” (19). If their rights were to be revoke half of the country would become superior to the other causing the rights of liberty and equality to disappear. Denying the rights of a woman based on her gender makes the country less of a democracy and more of an aristocracy (Anthony 19). The country was built upon equality for all but if women were not included than equality would never be

    Read More

  • Susan B Anthony Persuasive Speech

    1975 Words  | 8 Pages

    By using the countries’ own governmental document, Anthony masterfully poses, “In this very first paragraph of the declaration, is the assertion of the natural right of all to the ballot; for, how can “the consent of the governed” be given, if the right to vote be denied. Again: ‘That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles’” (Anthony par. 4-5). Women are citizens of the United States who are governed, yet they have no say in their government.

    Read More

  • Speech In Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

    714 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anthony, she speaks on the right to be able to vote in a presidential election. Her speech is about her right as a citizen to vote. In 1872 women did not have the right to vote, yet, she illegally voted in the presidential election. Ms. Anthony appealed the introduction to the U.S. Constitution, where she argues the start of it, “We, the people”, and not just male citizens. She verbalizes that, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.

    Read More

  • Address To Congress On Women's Suffrage Rhetorical Analysis

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    Woman Suffrage Women's right activist, Carrie Catt, in her speech, “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, explains how woman suffrage in inevitable. Catt’s purpose is to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. She adopts a confident tone , uses direct quotations, and appeals to logos in order to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. A confident tone is adopted by Catt throughout her entire speech to congress. Catt opens with “Woman suffrage is inevitable.”

    Read More

  • Address To Congress On Women's Suffrage Speech Analysis

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today, millions of women can implement their rights to vote in all elections in the united states of America, but this (rights) did not come easily to those women who sacrifice their lives to make this happen. In the speech “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, Catt delivered her message for women’s right from a firsthand account of what she had experienced as a woman living in the United States of America in the 19th century. She advocated for the rights of women to vote because she believes in equal rights and justice for all citizens. The speech was very successful because of the use of ethos, pathos, and logos.

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Women's Suffrage Movement

    888 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many speeches were given to help them gain their right. Susan B. Anthony gave speeches so that it would help them gain the support they needed for their journey. She did this to prove to women that they were not going to be taken seriously unless they prove that they can, which was getting that right for them. In 1872 Susan started doing things by herself. She went to vote illegally for the presidential election

    Read More

  • The Fundamental Principle Of A Republic Summary

    807 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The Fundamental Principle of a Republic” is a speech about women’s suffrage spoken by Anna Howard Shaw. This specific speech was given at the New York State equal suffrage campaign at the City Opera House in Ogdensburg, New York on June 21, 1915. Anna Howard Shaw was a well-known suffrage orator and social reformer. In addition to talking about women’s suffrage, this speech mentions how we, as a country, say we are a Republic but we really aren’t.

    Read More

  • Carrie Chapman Catt Speech Analysis

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    To urge the arrogant politicians to pass the women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution, Chapman Catt not only induces fear and culpability in them, but the language she employs also establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures and emulating the politicians’ style of speech. Chapman Catt establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures. Premising from the beginning of her address, she alludes to the cause of the American revolution, and the government’s power coming “from the consent” of the people as the two “fundamental principles” that “anchor” the liberty of the United States (39-40). This aligns her with the American ideals that founded the country. Building on that premise, she continues by

    Read More

  • Declaration Of Sentiments Rhetorical Analysis

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Shirley Chisholm's For The Equal Rights Amendment

    137 Words  | 1 Pages

    In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference Speech Similarities And Differences

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    Comparison Between On the Right of Women to Vote and the Perils of Indifference Speeches “On the Right of Women to Vote by Suzan B. Anthony and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel are among the most popular and significant speeches in the United States of America. Suzan B. Anthony made this speech in 1872 when she was accused to vote illegally. Elie Wiesel made his speech in 1999 where he was invited as intellectual to participate in Millennium Lecture Series. Although these speeches have some apparent similarities, the differences between them are also remarkable.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Susan B. Anthony's Speech

    991 Words  | 4 Pages

    She also states that no state can deny women the right to vote because everyone is a person and half the population should not be discriminated based on who they are. The repeated use of the word oligarchy in the second half of the speech gives the word a very bad connotation since it talks about people ruling other people, even though everyone is born equally. The word oligarchy has a bad connotation since it means a small group of people

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Angelina Grimke's Speech

    1764 Words  | 8 Pages

    She presented a strong position in that her goal was to overturn a system that was “built upon the broken hearts and prostate bodies of her countrymen in chains” all while appealing to duty and responsibilities of the men who stood before

    Read More

  • Susan B Anthony On Women's Right To Vote Analysis

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.

    Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis On A Woman's Right To Vote By Susan B Anthony

Open Document