Rhetorical Strategies In Eating Animals By Jonathan Safran Foer

577 Words3 Pages

In his book, "Eating Animals," Jonathan Safran Foer challenges readers to reevaluate their eating conduct and the effect they've on the arena around us. by means of exposing the cruel realities of commercial farming and the moral implications of eating meat, Foer activates readers to study the assumptions that underlie their consumption choices. in this essay, i'm able to explore the rhetorical strategies Foer employs to steer readers to appearance in a different way at their eating habits, the risks he's taking in doing so, and whether or not the blessings are well worth it. One of the primary rhetorical strategies Foer employs in "Eating Animals" is storytelling. by using sharing his very own private journey of exploring the moral implications of ingesting meat, in addition to the stories of farmers, activists, and others who've been affected by the beef industry, Foer humanizes the problem and makes it relatable. …show more content…

He presents a compelling argument for why we have to recall lowering or casting off our intake of animal products, the use of evidence and records to guide his claims. for example, Foer cites the fact that animal agriculture is chargeable for more greenhouse gas emissions than all kinds of transportation combined. via presenting this statistic in a clean and concise manner, Foer makes a robust case for the environmental blessings of lowering our meat consumption. Foer additionally appeals to our sense of morality and values. He emphasizes the significance of compassion and duty in our food choices, encouraging readers to remember the ethical implications of consuming meat. as an instance, Foer argues that if we agree with it is inaccurate to purpose pointless suffering to animals, we must not support an industry that is based on their exploitation. by way of appealing to our experience of right and wrong, Foer encourages readers to take a extra vital study their intake

Open Document