Robert M. Levine, an American historian and author, affirmed that “In a very real sense, we can say that modern Brazil was born in 1930 and came to maturity on August 24, 1954”. Levine is speaking of Getulio Vargas coming to power in 1930, and committing suicide on August 24, 1954. Vargas was an extremely influential leader to the Brazilian nation, and created a sense of unity amongst the country. Vargas’ regime did not only conjoin the nation, it initiated the modernization and industrialization that was necessary for Brazil. Levine is correct in stating that modern Brazil was born at the beginning of Vargas’ term, and came into maturity when he died, for it was Vargas who founded Brazilian nationalism. Prior to Vargas coming into power, …show more content…
On November 3rd, 1930, Getulio Vargas came into power. Vargas was an extremely charismatic leader, that with great confidence ensured citizens Brazil would achieve prosperity, and unity. Under Vargas’ regime, there was a large emphasis on “Brazilianation”, or making the entire population, including immigrants, more Brazilian. Brazilian history and culture was taught in schools, and Brazilian symbols were displayed as a form of nationalism. This campaign attempted to force assimilation, and required Brazilian teachers to teach at immigrant schools, as well as required translations on Japanese and German newspapers. Later, immigrant schools and publications were shut down by Vargas’ administration. Vargas raised the military budget by 49% and, unlike the old republic, the federal military received a considerable role of power. On November 10th, 1937, Vargas read the constitution on the radio broadcasting the birth of the “New State”, or the Estado Novo. The Estado Novo was largely influenced by fascism, and the new state of Fascism that had recently been recently created by Portugal. This new state was not a democracy, or a republic, rather was entirely governed and strengthened by Vargas himself. The press was extremely censored, as were schools and what school teachers could teach. The purpose of this …show more content…
Vargas increased minimum wage laws, and working class citizens favored and benefited from his policies. Many civilians viewed Vargas as the “chief organizer of the country”, and appreciated him for the efforts he made to assist the poor. Joana De Masi Zero’s excerpt from “Five Lives Affected by Vargas-Era Reforms”, praised Vargas and his regime stating “Many people said that he was a dictator, but he did many things for us workers. His labor laws were good…Every time the politicians changed the laws they took more from us. Getulio’s time was good; later, I don’t know…They say he was a dictator, but for us he was good” (Joana De Masi Zero, Fives Lives Affected by Vargas-Era Reform, 220). Vargas is honored in other publications such as, “Gauchos Take the Obelisk”, when it is anonymously noted that “Vargas and a new group of military and civilian allies quickly proceeded to construct a state apparatus that put a strong federal imprint on agricultural production, health and education, culture, and labor policy, among other fields of public administration” (Gauchos Take the Obelisk, 186). Vargas’ administration called attention to the beautification and modernization of cities, and Vargas had large aspirations of modeling Brazil after the robust world powers. In Rio de Janerio, Vargas prioritized
(Hellman186). The pattern of patronage, clientelism and party loyalty had been perpetuated ever since, it wasn’t until 1972 where activists had challenged the pattern of political control. Unfortunately the new leaders perpetuated the cycle of political corruption. Roberto believes that the SNTE has become a center for corruption and patronage headed by officers selling second jobs to desperate teachers
Rafael Trujillo’s evil personality allowed him to do cruel acts and in order to fix the problem, many laws have been made to prevent this era to occur again, a pluralist democracy was beginning to emerge, and the
Although the country of Brazil fashions itself as a racial democracy, and promotes the Afro-Cuban culture through programs and tourism, very few Black have ascended to important government or corporate
The article informs the public about the impeachment proceedings that are facing Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff…the leader of the largest economy within Latin America. The court has found President Rousseff’s administration with violations upon the fiscal responsibility laws, of which she has used the money from state-created banks to fill the budget gaps and pay for social programs. If the impeachment passes within the House, President Rousseff will be temporarily removed from office for six months, of which will allow the Senate a decent amount of time to decide upon permanent removal of President Rousseff. This becomes an stronger issue, as the President (of which nearly won her re-election last year) is facing a degrading view upon her image if she is found guilty. However, their is hope for President Rousseff.
Rafael Trujillo, the autocratic dictator of the Dominican Republic during the middle of the twentieth century, leveraged his status in society to oppress the working class for his benefit. In the novel, In the Time of the Butterflies, Julia Alvarez exhibits Trujillo exploiting the proletariat to gain wealth and power by creating a hegemony in which the working class knew that they were being oppressed, but did not do anything about it. Trujillo forced the people to idolize him in a narcissistic way, evoked fear in the working class, and used the secret police to give himself an upper edge over the proletariat. A country’s dictator will exploit their people to keep their position in power.
Christian’s convictions on this topic clash with the views of most historians. Nonetheless, she exposes another side to the FSLN that is not well documented in Nicaraguan historiography. Soon after the publication of Christian’s work, Jose L. Coraggio published Nicaragua Revolution and Democracy, which addressed the social repercussions the FLSN and democracy had on Nicaraguan society. Straying from Christian’s method of interjecting her
Racial disparity in Brazil is best explained in Abdias Nascimento article, Quilombismo: An Afro-Brazilian Political Alternative. “I believe that the Black and mulatto the Brazilian of colour must have a racial counter-ideology and a counter position in socioeconomic terms. The Brazilian of colour must strive simultaneously for a double change: socioeconomic change in the country, and change in race and colour relations.” In 1968, through these words, Afro-Brazilian scholar, artist, and politician Abdias Nascimento called attention to the potentially divergent but essentially related nature of the two main objectives of Afro-Brazilian activism: first, to effect concrete change in the distribution of social and economic power in Brazil, and second,
On its premiere in Madrid in 1967, El tragaluz was very well received, particularly due to its ‘experimental’ structure and subtle criticism of the Franco regime, which were considered avant-garde for the time. The play calls for the audience to be propelled into the distant future and become observers of an experiment that is temporally based in the 1960s. Therefore, the audience members of the time were watching their contemporaries in the form of the main characters. The play is centered around three significant periods including the end of the Spanish Civil War in 1939, the mid-1960s, and the twenty-fifth century or thirtieth century. The main story line follows the turbulent relationship between two brothers who lead very different lives as a consequence of the civil war.
Introduction Brazil's independence takes place in a relatively short period of time. Which can be officially placed between February 18, 1822 and March 8, 1824, which, compared to other wars of independence in different parts of the world, we can say that it is smaller, and also comparing the way it is carried out After this independence, we can say that, although the conflict was not totally peaceful, it was a less bloody war, in comparison with the majority of the wars of the other Spanish-American countries. The most important issues about Brazilian independence, which takes place as a result of the Napoleonic wars, will be discussed. To begin to give a context to this event, I will begin by saying that the most important trigger for
As an exile, Virgilio moved from place to place but did not go back to help the country. With his new found freedom, he helped the nation under dictatorship in different ways. Exiling him was, and easy task for Trujillo. But the Mirabel’s were unlike other resistors, who when their safety came into question readily gave up. The Mirabel’s knew on their way back home from visiting their husbands in the mountains on November 25th, 1960 would be their last day.
Although Juan Carlo had Arias as Prime Minister; he did not let Arias political beliefs of dictatorship influence his actions, therefore demonstrating his integrity and self-discipline. Nevertheless, Juan Carlos was put in a predicament where he had to endure an immense amount of stress due to the battle between the left and the right, and having to cope with Arias. Despite this expressive stress Juan Carlos commitment to democracy did not stop him in pursuing his purpose of reaching government reform. In fact he worked harder towards his purpose; for instance, he put a great amount of time in establishing loyalty with armed forces; as well as traveling to different parts of Spain to demonstrate his loyalty towards democratization (Preston 354).
After exploring the hidden truths behind the culture, I have discovered this: The cultural identity of the Brazilian community is far more diverse and dynamic than what is portrayed in society and the media. One of the most important contributing aspects to a community’s culture is its history. Brazil was discovered by Pedro Álvares Cabral on April 22,1500. From that point on, the Portuguese ruled over this land, focusing greatly on its vast sugar-cane plantations.
However, despite rapid deforestation there have been long drawn efforts made by the domestic and global actors for forest conservation and curbing practices of deforestation. This has led to a tussle between pro-development and pro-environment policy networks trying to influence policies which directly affect the Amazon Rainforest and its inhabitants. The paper will also analyze 4 stages in the history of Brazil from 1960s to now in light of such policy networks. Causes of Deforestation (1) Rapid Population Growth Studies show Amazonian populations have high intrinsic growth rates, which has led to an increase in the population
History and Religion in Brazil Brazil was discovered in 1500, by the Portuguese under the command of Pedro Alvarez Cabral, then became independent in 1822. In 1889 Brazil declares itself as a Republic, pompously. The country is separated into twenty-seven states; Acre, Alagoas, Amapa, Amazonas, Bahia, Ceara, Distrito Federal, Espirito Santo, Goias, Maranhao, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Para, Paraiba, Parana, Pernambuco, Piaui, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Norte, Rio Grande do Sul, Rondonia, Roraima, Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, Sergipe, and Tocantins. In 1888, Brazil abolished slavery, which was a huge step for them. In 1917, Brazil was among the Allied countries that declared war on Germany in the First World War.
This fact also seems to justify the self percieved uniqueness of the Brazilian identity that enables it to amalgamate and accomodate different races; though prejudice cannot be completely eliminated. The permanent Japanese immigration to Brazil led to the birth of many second generation Japanese Brazilians. The categories of the issei( first generation), nessei(second generation) and the tessei(third generation) emerged. During the Second World War, as suspicion towards Japan rose (which even resulted in Japenese internment in United States), the diaspora in Brazil became fragmented between the nationalist and the moderates.