When it comes to arguments, debates, and anything else, you must do and say tailored things in order to show your point or justify how you're right. Comparable to the debate during the 1980 US presidential election, the two candidates, current President Jimmy Carter and California Governor Ronald Reagan, participated in a debate over how they would address inflation if elected, and they did so to persuade the public to vote for them in the election. In the debate, Ronald Reagan had a better argument because of what he said and how he said it. Firstly, in the debate about inflation, Ronald Reagan had a more compelling argument because he used evidence in the form of statistics. "When Mr. Carter became President [in 1977], inflation was 4.8 percent, …show more content…
"Why is it inflationary to let the people keep more of their money and spend it the way they'd like, and it isn't inflationary to let him (Carter) take that money and spend it the way he wants?" "1980 Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter Presidential Debate." Ronald Reagan, www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/1980-ronald-reagan-and-jimmy-carter-presidential-debate. Accessed May 9, 2023. Pathos is a literary device that appeals to the audience's emotions. A persuasive argument is won through manipulating emotions rather than using solid evidence. A mistake in reasoning known as emotional appeal occurs when a debater tries to win an argument by rousing the audience's and opponent's emotions. To win over the audience and popular opinion, one must not rely simply on emotional appeal, but the fact of the matter is that he used it to boost his own opinion and make people think about who has their best interests at heart. The benefit of having more money in people's pockets is that if people have more money to spend on leisurely things, then as long as people are doing very well, businesses will also be doing better, and so on until inflation decreases naturally through money
During the campaign of 1980, Ronald Reagan announced a formula to fix the nation’s economy. He claimed an inordinate tax burden, intemperate government regulation, and huge social spending programs hindered growth. Reagan proposed a 30 percent tax cut for the first three years of his term in office. The bulk cut would be directed towards the upper income levels. The economic theory was called supply-side of trickle-down economics.
Several people have chosen Ronald Reagan as a great President, my guess is that most of you have gotten your opinions from the media about so many conservatives thinking of Reagan as near to sainthood, I personnaly lived with the current events of his Presidency. There are a few items that tend to get glossed over, such as: he fell asleep while speaking to the Pope, he entertained the Taliban in the White House, Reagan raised taxes on the middle class eleven times while tripling the deficit, Reagan secretly and unconstitutionally sold weapons to Iran to fund an illeagal war in Nicaragua, Reagan gave ammesty to 3 million illegal immagrants, Reagan took money from the Social Security Trust fund and replaced it with IOU’s, Reagan ignored AIDS
Reaganomics, also known as supply-side economics or trickle-down economics, was an economic policy implemented by Ronald Reagan during his presidency from 1981 to 1989. It is important to look at the outcomes of these policies objectively and consider their long-term consequences. Reaganomics included a set of policies that aimed to boost economic growth and reduce government intervention. The main principles were tax cuts, deregulation, and reduced government spending. Supporters believed that these measures would encourage private sector investments, increase productivity, and lead to widespread prosperity.
Both Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush served as presidents of the United States of America during the late 20th century, from 1981-89 and 1989-93 respectively. Their presidencies covered the ending of the Cold War and the transition from a bipolar to a unipolar world. The Cold War was a hegemonic struggle between the United States (US) and the Soviet Union/USSR (which later became Russia) and dominated world relations since the end of the Second World War. Primarily, the Cold War was marked by the ideological and economic expansion of US capitalism and Soviet communism, which underlined many proxy wars and self-determination struggles. Both presidents sought to promote the US’ best interests, but the execution of these was determined by
Carter v. Reagan The Unites States of America came to be by the signing of The Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776 and ever since then there have been great leaders elected to run this great country. There have been 56 presidential elections in the 240 years of the United States. In the election of 1980, Democrat nominee Jimmy Carter, was running for a second term against Republican nominee Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan’s presidencies are commonly referred to as “The Reagan Era,” which was full of ups and downs. He was strongly supported for his familiar and casual rhetoric, although it often reflected his lack of knowledge on the topics he dealt with. One occurrence where his amiable and humorous demeanor settled itself negatively within his career was in 1984 when he “...made a joke about bombing Russia. The recording was transmitted to the press…” (History.com). This slip revealed how reckless of a figure Reagan was, and gave the public reason to question his adaptation of what is appropriate at the executive level, thus questioning his credibility.
In the 1930s, Reagan had been a liberal Democrat who was a supporter Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) and his New Deal programs. But in 1962, Reagan switched sides to the Republican Party and helped Richard Nixon (1913-1994) in his unsuccessful campaign for the California governorship. In 1966, Reagan ran for governor of California on a platform that called for the downsizing of the California state government. He won easily. In 1968, he made an unsuccessful attempt for the Republican presidential nomination, but was reelected to the California governor 's office in 1970.
Ronald Reagan had an advantage when dealing with the media thanks to acting. Most Americans during the time of the Reagan presidency received news via television. Edel (1992) noted Reagan was “especially effective” on television, and he rarely let “inquiring reporters or other distractions” phase him. He knew “every trick in the cameraman’s book” and was able to use it to his advantage in his presidency (p.263). Reagan was always camera ready making him look personable, cheerful, and in control on the television.
Pathos is a literary technique that sparks pity or sadness in the
Reagan and Carter certainly had their differences in terms of tax reform, but concerning foreign policy, especially Afghanistan, they were both on the exact same page. If Carter brought up the Operation through its adolescence, Reagan certainly brought it to its maturity. Since Reagan absolutely insisted on the notion of Whatever Carter had done to successfully deploy Operation Cyclone, Reagan took and expanded upon greatly. Upon entering office in 1981, Reagan nearly doubled the Operation’s Budget : most of the money the CIA donated was given to them under the direction of Wilson. In the years after 1983, Wilson was reported to have given the CIA as much as $300 million over the planned budget, under the excuse of “allowing the fighters
For example Bush says, “Thousands of lives were suddenly ended by evil, despicable acts of terror” to show the sadness and emotion in the situation. This is an example of pathos because it is showing shock causing sadness, when the audience hears this part they feel sad and care more from imagining what happened or what they saw. This makes people around the world want to help more because they feel bad for people injured or families that have lost loved
The Rise of Ronald Reagan and Republican Conservatism Conservatism and liberalism are two of the most dominant political philosophies and ideologies during the post-Enlightenment era (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). As an ideology, conservatism served as a blueprint in the society which promoted the idea of retaining traditional social institutions, beliefs, cultures and discourage social changes. Although the United States of America during the present day promotes liberalism, there was one portion of the country’s history that conservatism was promoted due to several factors. This paper examines the very factors which gave rise to conservatism embodied in the candidacy of Ronald Reagan.
Pathos is a rhetorical device used for providing emotion to the reader. He wants the reader to feel sympathetic towards the mistreatment of African-Americans. In the introduction, the first rhetorical device he introduced is pathos. Coates present pathos when he introduced Clyde Ross. He titles the first chapter as, “So that’s just one of my losses”.
the Reagan years were extremely complex, in part, because of great confusion in the National Security Council and the State Department and in part, because there were many unique challenges to American hegemony. In his first year, President Reagan had to deal with a number of festering problems: a) the consolidation of Khomeini’s Islamic government in Iran; b) the occupation of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union in 1979; c) warfare between Iraq and Iran, 1980-1988; d) the cross-border raids of Israeli and Palestinian forces in Lebanon, 1980-82 and their aftermath with the occupation by Israel of Southern Lebanon. Furthermore, the marked rise of terrorism added a new dimension, especially because many states, including Israel, Libya and Iran, appeared
Pathos is when the speech appeals to the audience’s emotions. President Abraham Lincoln uses pathos is this speech to console the audience for the losses that the country has endured during the Civil War. Lincoln uses pathos to convey sadness when he says, “The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.” When saying this Lincoln appeals to the people’s emotions by explaining that their loved ones struggled there and he also appeals to the feeling of pride they feel for their loved ones who dedicated their lives to their cause. Another example of pathos in this speech is, “...that from these honored dead we take increased devotion-that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain…”