Self-interest, a common term that is widely used today, is described as the act of pursuing one’s personal benefit or desires. Many, however, have different interpretation and perception of this term. Some may argue that it is an individual act that can benefit the society, while others say that it is only pursued for one’s own advantage regardless of others. So, what then is self-interest?
Adam Smith, the “father of modern economics” and a moral philosopher, focuses much on personal ethics and human morality in an economic system. Smith introduces self-interest as the great motivator in an economic activity which cultivates a competitive free market economy. When individuals are in the process of providing their own self-interest, it can
…show more content…
This enables the society to be interdependent through production and consumption. Everyone’s labour, whether immediate or in the long run, can play a role in making a better place by serving the needs of others. Smith, in his writing, concludes that, “among men, … the most dissimilar geniuses are of use to one another; the different produces of their respective talents, by the general disposition to truck, barter, and exchange, being brought, as it were, into a common stock, where every man may purchase whatever part of the produce of other men's talents he has occasion for.” (Book1, Chap2, para 5). Unlike selfishness, which causes oneself to strive to be ahead of others or being too obsessed in accumulating wealth for his own purposes, men should instead work together creatively, utilizing their personal gifts and talents in building the community encourage collaborations through specialisation.
Furthermore, Adam Smith made a clear distinction between self-interest and selfishness by connecting human ethic to economic decisions as he adopts universal moral truths to describe economic behaviour. Although decisions or choices made by individuals are fundamentally based on self-interest, it is also important to note that they too include the idea of mutual sympathy and the fellow-feeling to
…show more content…
As beings who are naturally social, one’s actions are profoundly driven by sympathy, i.e. a moral understanding or “emotion which we feel for the misery of others” (I.I.1.1). When one sympathizes with another, he places himself in the others’ circumstances and identify with their feelings. Hence, Smith also argues that “Sympathy, however, cannot, in any sense, be regarded as a selfish principle” (VII.III.7).
Since everyone exhibits at least some form of generosity, it is evident that self-interest cannot be adequately considered as selfishness or greed. People in their self-interest can exhibit a caring attitude towards others, for example, supporting family and friends financially or donating to charity. This then fulfils the individual’s personal desire and motive to better one’s condition. As such, when being interested in other people is our best interest, it promotes benevolent activities towards others without
Zinn believes the collective efforts of individuals alone, without a huge income motivating them would be efficient enough and would work well. He argues that there is no real proof that incentives are even necessary, therefore not needed. Zinn would agree with the philosopher and socialist St.Thomas Aquinas in the sense that Aquinas believes man can unselfishly work towards a goal together because everyone is willing to fulfill their own specific duties. This parallels with Zinn’s belief that people do not need huge incomes to incentivise them. On the other hand, Zinn would disagree with Adam Smith in his belief that man “seeks self interest in competition”.
Business Ethics Paper #1 Recently, we have discussed about a few arguments for capitalism in the class, which is utilitarian argument, the libertarian argument, the private property argument and Adam Smith’s argument. Personally, I will be expected to talk about Adam Smith’s argument and the private property. In my opinion, Adam Smith is a major economist in the history.
In Business Ethics self-interest is defined as a number of philosophical, psychological and economic theories in looking out for one’s personal interest or advantage. This is especially true when pursued without regard to the wellbeing of others. When someone says the name Bernie Madoff the first thing that comes to most people’s minds is thief, swindler, dishonest, swindler and criminal. These labels are all undesired and socially negative connotations for any one individual to be called. When you take the name Bernie Madoff and the word “self-interest” and put them together what comes to mind is a person consumed by greed who only ever gave any thought to their own wellbeing.
Being selfish is only part of who we are and what we need to flourish according to virtue ethicists; Aristotle,
Self-interest rightly understoo; represented a desire to serve the general good and understanding of the social dimension of private choices that was a complex balance of seemingly opposite goals. The federal government encouraged people to balance public good and private interest, as did intermediate institutions such as voluntary associations and the structure of family life. By pursuing each individuals’ own interests, the total benefit to society was greatest for all. Tocqueville initially compared enlightened interest in a negative way with classical concept of virtue, seeing Americans as driven primarily by material gain.
Adam Smith is known as the originator of the first of the free-market capitalism, laissez-faire as well as a father of modern economics. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, or commonly abbreviated as "The Wealth of Nations" is a famous book by Adam Smith that contains economic ideas now known as classical economics. Inspiration from this book came from her teacher while studying at the University of Glasgow namely Francis Hutcheson and college friend David Hume (Becker, 2007). Posts Smith also consists of a thorough explanation megenai and fisokrat mercantilist writings were well into an economic study materials. Differences of opinion between Smith and you mercantilist one of the factors that determine prosperity,
Selfishness and selflessness can be balanced, and this balance is crucial to a functioning
Adam Smith believed in individual economic decision-making because the people would be able to pursue their own interests without government input. In Adam Smith’s The Wealth Of Nations, Document C, he writes, “The [ruler] is completely discharged... no human wisdom or knowledge could ever be sufficient”. Adam Smith believed that without government interference every man can pursue his own interests in his own way.
Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both address selfishness and its effect on society through social and economic means. In Wealth of Nations, Smith defines wealth as the productivity of a nation and the aspects of a commercial society. “The Communist Manifesto” criticizes the idea behind a capitalist society and talks about the class struggle between the working class and the owners of the means of production. Wealth of Nations and “The Communist Manifesto” both analyze how the selfishness of people affects society, however while Wealth of Nations claims selfishness causes increased productivity and increases wages for all, “The Communist Manifesto” argues that selfishness causes injustice
The economic views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx Microeconomics Eduardo De Oliveira Superti Table of Contents: Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The economic views of Adam Smith 5 The economic views of Karl Marx 6 Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx 7 Examples in the world of today 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction Adam Smith and Karl Marx were completely contrasting economists throughout their time and had an enormous effect on the world and the way we view economics. They represent the ideas of capitalism and socialism.
Adam Smith is an 18th-century philosopher and free-market economist. He is known as the father of economics and is famous for his ideas about the efficiency of the division of labor and the societal benefits of individuals ' pursuit of their own self-interest. Smith is best known for two classic works: The Theory of Moral Sentiments, and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The latter, usually known as The Wealth of Nations, is the first modern work of economics and the book which is considered in this research. This research will discuss chapter four of The Wealth of Nations (WN), specifically Smith’s paragraph of water diamond paradox.
Adam Smith, an advocate of capitalism, in his book, The Wealth of Nations wrote that all individuals are selfish and by performing to the best of their capabilities towards their own selfish interests they contribute towards the nation’s collective growth. Karl Marx, on the other hand criticized capitalism and believed that socialism and communism are society’s best chance of maximizing individual happiness, about which he wrote in his book Das Kapital. In this paper, we will compare and contrast the economics theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the lines of labor theory of value, division of labor, alienation of workers from labor and human happiness and surplus profit and its social implications. This paper will also discuss how… Adam Smith believes that there are two types of ‘values’ of a commodity – ‘utility value’ and ‘exchange value’. The utility value of a commodity is based on how useful a commodity is and the exchange value of a commodity refers to how much we can get in exchange for a commodity if we were to sell it.
Part of what makes us human, according to Smith, is our propensity to truck, barter, and exchange items. This propensity can be observed in any society, including the most primitive. It is, in turn, the assurance of being able to trade what one produces with others that encourages the division of labor. When two parties enter into a trade with one another, both come away with something they were previously lacking. The division of labor will continue to be a powerful force so long as this condition is
Sofia Puato October 9, 2017 11-FireTree Sir Geoffrey Cruz Why a Human Being is Selfish At some points in his life, a human being can become selfish. For several reasons he would think of his own good over the good of others around him. Often he thinks putting himself first would do him anything good. It may do good to him but not to others whose wishes and favors were put aside for the human being's own wishes and favors.
Self-interest is when people settle on choices that are in their own particular best advantage. Like then you choose to get up toward the beginning of the day to go to work and profit, or when you pay the supermarket for sustenance that you might want to eat. Social interest is when decisions are made that advantage society all in all. Envision one individual, who is all knowing and truly thinks about the general population.