Smoking in public places: should it be banned? A large number of non-smokers are exposed to tobacco smoke in public areas. Stated by Hinds and First (1975), “Concentrations of Nicotine and Tobacco smoke in public places”. In some countries, smoking in public places is considered ordinary with no enough attention given to prevent the issue. Not many have enough information about the effects of smoking in open places and people that suffer from it.
I am sure there are many smokers but the majority most likely are nonsmokers. Faculty and staff that smoke would most likely not support the ban, arguing that not being allowed to smoke on campus can create a traffic rush due to people leaving during breaks to smoke thus causing vehicle accidents. Also, not smoking whenever can have students skipping class or leaving from class early to smoke thus possibly hindering good grades and reducing attention in class. Faculty and staff that do not smoke would support the ban, citing that faculty and staff that smoke can have a negative influence on students and a loss in respect among peers. Ultimately, faculty and staff would support the
Smoking activity should continue being banned in public places so that a new page for health and development of the whole population would be open up. These are only a few out of many other effects that cigarette smoking can have, but to any sensible person they are more than enough to realize that smoking is bad. People cannot possibly be proud of calling themselves smokers. It is terrible for health as well as many other reasons. In the end, there are not benefits that one could gain by
If someone raises his voice against them, he may have a chance to be humiliated. And smoking in front of adolescents most alarmingly encourages them to habituate smoker. Not to mention that such kind of heinous acts is obviously the crime that must not go unpunished. And it would be the crucial to ensure nonsmokers protection through the restriction of smoking in public places and workplaces. In the context of halting smoking in public places, we have two news – encouraging and disheartening.
Even though there are many people claims that banning smoking in the public will bring many benefits to the society, however, this statement is only up to a certain extent. In fact, there are many arguments that disagree with the legalisation of banning smoking in the public area. Banning smoking would infringe a person’s choice and right and affect the business and economy of a country. The government should not implement the smoking ban in the public it is because banning smoking is an act of infringing a person’s choice and right. The government should not regulate a person’s choice and right just because smoking is harmful.
Such places will often ignore the ban and are unlikely to be caught. Banning smoking in public places would drive many bars, pubs and clubs out of business. Therefore, many of these places will lose income because of the decrease in costumers. This will lead to more poverty because there will be no more money to pay employees in such work places. Lung disease, cancers, and heart disease are just some of the thousands of harmful effects of smoking.
I feel like this would be the best because it would not require any from my group to go up to the smoker themselves and ask for them to move. This would fit with my group, seeing as they originally did not want to go up to the smokers to begin with. Completely banning smoking anywhere outside I do not feel like would benefit my group because then there would be no place close to the league for them to smoke, so they would continue to smoke right outside the doors. While this may not stop all the smoking next to the door, it will greatly cut done on the amount of people who do, seeing that in both groups it found that once the smoking ban was in place and there was signs posted, they had a decrease in the amount of people who smoked near
First, it is all about human rights and freedom, which is the smoker’s choice. They can do whatever they want even it is a foolish thing so long will not do detrimental to other people. Also, it is legal to smoke a cigarette, so the government has no power to attempt to make people stop.There is no denying that an essential problem is what they would do when smoking outside is illegal. Banning smoking at public will urge people to smoke more at home, which will damage to others in their house, particularly children. Each year, at least 6,200 children in the US die as a result of cigarette smoke.
They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood”. Thus meaning if a person would like to enjoy there leisure time by smoking in a bar with some friends the government should allow this to happen and even have designated areas for them to do so. A ban on smoking in public areas would mean that smokers would not be able to enjoy themselves in the way that they would like, and many smokers feel that that would be a violation of their rights. The amount of money that the government will gain from banning of cigarettes will be nothing compared to the amount of money lost from taxing cigarettes, since the taxing of cigarettes made up about 5 Billion Pounds in the UK before the smoking ban was put in place, therefore governments which do implement the ban will actually lose money from the tax on cigarettes, since there will be less smokers. This can only reduce the countries budget and cause fewer changes to happen due to less money in the