Two predominant social theorists on homosexuality that I read about and I found their information very interesting was David Halperin and Jean Foucault. Both Halperin and Foucault believe that the environment may contribute to a person’s homosexuality, but their ideas are very different. Halperin believed in Plano physical theory, this theory believes that homosexuality is an error. Halperin postulates that if a child have a strong mom and weak dad, who has unresolved Oedipus complex, will eventually lead to a weak and homosexual son. But many psychologist disagree and feel like this same arrangement may make the son stronger instead of weak. Foucault believed that the only reason why homosexuality became, is because of us, we made it. When
During the 1950s and 60s, society looked down on homosexuality. The general public opinion was that homosexuality was something to be ashamed of and threatening to wholesome family values. In a 1967 CBS News documentary called “The Homosexuals”, anchor Mike Wallace said, “In preparing this broadcast, CBS News commissioned a survey by the Opinion Research Corporation into public attitudes about homosexuality. We discovered that Americans consider homosexuality more harmful to society than adultery, abortion, or prostitution.”
Over time, there have been multiple historical figures who have inspired others and have changed the course of history and influenced people around the world for years to come. Two of the aforementioned people were Toussaint L’Ouverture and Mohandas Gandhi. Toussaint L’Ouverture was an important figure in the freedom of Haiti from European imperialism. Haiti was controlled by European Imperialists who had terrible conditions for slaves, heavily taxed and fined the natives, and treated them unfavorably. He connected Enlightment ideas and ideas from the French Revolution in his fight for independence from Haiti.
Sam Allberry, the author of the book Is God Anti-Gay, provides an easy-to-read and comprehensive analysis of topics surrounding homosexuality. He covers the relationships between homosexuality and God’s design; homosexuality and the Bible; homosexuality and the Christian; homosexuality and the church; and homosexuality and the world. Alberry’s view of our relationship with God and each other is very Biblically accurate; however, his view on judgment is slightly different from what I believe is found in scripture. His analysis of the relationship between human marriage and God’s nature is very accurate and profound. Allberry’s views about the gift of singleness share a similar profound accuracy.
Although there is no evidence to support this hypothesis it even influenced UK Legislation from 1988 until 2003 , banning state schools from teaching children about homosexuality. This legislation was brought into act when homosexuality was against many social norms due to the increase in the HIV/AIDS virus, this legislation was therefore seen as an attack on the LGBT community. Freud's psychoanalytic theory also attempted to explain homosexuality Freud believed that the root of all behaviours were due to our unconscious minds therefore homosexuality can be due to negative childhood experiences such as a negative relationships these experiences are then repressed in our unconscious mind. Freud stated these male homosexuality could be caused due to a father being distant from his son or closeness to a mother. Overall, psychoanalytic theory suggests that our behaviour is influenced by two motivations that ultimately create conflict within an individual the “Thanatos” creates aggression, sadism and our fear or death,
Kinsey’s continuum measures sexual orientation based off of experiences, affection, and desires ranging from being exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual. Kinsey’s study allowed for the fluidity of sexual orientation to be measured and exist. I think hate crimes and homophobia stems from negative beliefs towards people regarding other’s preference. Hate crimes are the act of aggression and homophobia is bias against homosexuality. I think institutions along with other social structures impact people’s beliefs and influence these inequalities systemically.
The 1920s were changing times and with people becoming more open about who they were, the idea of homosexuality began to become more widespread. However, that did not mean that homosexuality was in any way accepted by society. Doctors and psychologists believed that there was something wrong with people who identified as homosexual and there was a way to “fix” them. The doctors underwent studies attempting to classify and categorize these people based on their human behavior. Havelock Ellis was a physician and psychologist who discussed a phenomenon known as “sexual inversion.”
DJ Mc Screwdriver: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to WLGB, I am your swave, handsome, charming and otherwise great guy, DJ Mc Screwdriver. Today we are talking about the perception of homosexuals in modern times amongst American citizens. Here with me I have five experts, Dr. Durso, Dr. Berry, Dr. Beckhed and Dr. Tan and Dr. Mora, each who have interesting facts to contribute. So to start off, does religion affect sexuality in any way?
Anti-homosexuality presented a common ground between religion and psychology. As late as
According to Foucault, sexuality is just a social construct and has been turned into a discourse which in turn is used to exercise control and maintain the power structure. We have to follow these rules laid down by the governing power or else we are considered to be deviants. Tracing back the history of sexuality, Foucault argues that homosexuality was born in 1870's. With this he means that in earlier times homosexuality was taken to be normal and not considered to be a crime. It was considered to be the behaviour of an individual instead of his identity.
He expressed that, “It's very important that even closeted sexuality be something that's seriously interrogated, because it can lead toward a kind of internalized homophobia within gay or lesbian persons themselves,” (West 404). When society persists in keeping a closed mind and combat homosexuality, then a number of homosexuals will remain hesitant in exiting the closet since, they would be petrified of being terrorized. Consequently, the mainstream causes unjustified homophobia in insecure homosexuals, which could eventually lead to depression. It is abnormal to be fearful of oneself, therefore, communities should put in effort to embrace any sexuality in pursuance of keeping their population mentally healthy. Likewise, “If one is gay or lesbian, one should be proud of it.
I think, the boy in this family didn’t like. Lastly, when a lesbian family has a boy, it is hard to grow him up. He wants to see a father near his, not two
Many treatments and therapies were being created and used to try and cure homosexuality. Although
Sexuality is one of those feelings that you are born with. Different cultures and religions have their own definition of sexuality. It's not something that you choose, it's a natural physically, emotional, and sexual attraction to male, female, or even both. For centuries it is believe by some cultures that if you weren't heterosexual then you have a mental disease and considered abnormal. Foucault believed that power is persuasive, multi-faced, and is not already planned.
In the article, Paula England explains that sexual attractions and behaviors are affected by biology and can be affected by social construction. However, social norms regulate how society views things as sexually appealing or disgusting. Sexual orientation refers to whether individuals are attracted to members of the sex, the same sex, or both. A study was done and the results showed that behavior attraction, and identity are not always consistent. The article discuses that same sex siblings of homosexual individuals were also homosexual when they were identical twins, fraternal twins and adoptive siblings.
Foucault’s Conception of Power and its Compatibilism with Liberating Action In The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction, Michel Foucault uses the history of sexuality to problematize the widespread notion of power as essentially repressive. He begins with what he calls the “repressive hypothesis,” which is the notion that sexuality and discourse surrounding it has been repressed for the last three centuries (Foucault 6). Foucault goes on to reject this hypothesis because discourse surrounding sexuality has multiplied rather than decreased, which is inconsistent with this hypothesis (Foucault 17). According to this hypothesis, sexuality was repressed by the government, with the law being its way to exercise power over the individuals