Slavery became a key issue in the arguments of the north and the south. The south was very agricultural while the north was industrial. The south feared the declaration of freedom for the slaves by government leaders in the north. Government officials at the time were not interested in ending Slavery in the slave states, but instead in keeping newly admitted states from becoming slave states. The first official disagreement of this came in 1820. By the end of 1819, there were eleven Free states and eleven slave states. In 1820 Maine and Missouri wanted to enter the union and Congress had to decide whether to admit them in as Free states or slave states. At the time, Missouri had about two thousand Slaves. An amendment was introduced in the House by James Tallmadge, a New York Representative to ban slavery in Missouri when the amendment was voted on and passed in the house. In the Senate where the amount of slave state representatives was equal to the amount of Free states, it became a tie. A heated battle started between the representatives from the Northern and Southern states following the Missouri Compromise. …show more content…
It stated that there would be no slavery in the north of the 36.20 degree latitude line this included any lands west of the southern boundary of Missouri. In 1850, the issue of slavery came again. There were fifteen slave states and fifteen Free states. California had been settled heavily from the Gold Rush and wanted to be admitted to the union as a free state. This would throw off the balance between slave and Free states. This debate became known as the Great Debate. Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky proposed a
How the Missouri Compromise made political conditions worse: The Missouri Compromise… The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to remove sectional and political rivalries between the North and the South. The North was provoked by the authorization of Missouri becoming a slave state by the South in 1819.
It required both sides to seek fugitives which went against the North's belief and caused them to be under the impression of being part of the slave system. Slavery was considered morally wrong to them and they made many attempts to have it abolished. Comparatively, the South received slaves and were seen as possessing a free pass. The Compromise of 1850 included this law along with the abolishment of the slave trade in the District of Columbia hoping to have pleased the North and South. In contrast, the North disunited even more based off of the favoritism towards the South.
Sanghee Song Professor Jessie History 11 21 April 2015 Westward Movement For now, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every discussion about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had tried to settle this question: It had let in Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, conserving the breakable balance in Congress. It had specified that in the future, slavery would be banned north of the southern boundary of Missouri in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.
For years the Southern States and the Northern States argued over the concept of slavery. It is generally thought that those in the North were the abolitionist and those in the South were the slavers. While this is generally accurate there was a bit more nuance in it. The issue of Missouri came around when it applied for statehood. The number of free and slave states was equal, and this threatened that fragile balance.
Following the Mexican-American War, the conflict of 1846 through 1848 caused by Texas gaining its independence from Mexico, opinions and actions of the American citizens and government concerning slavery drastically changed. Beginning from the wishy-washiness of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, American ideas and values evolved - proven through the Emancipation Proclamation of 1865. Through the seventeen different presidents coming into power during the time frame of 1787 to 1865, the judgments of slavery exceptionally differed from each man in power, having a large impact on the current situation of slavery during their time in office. Following the Mexican-American war, America acquired so much new land, sprouting the debate over slavery
I believe that the Fugitive Slave Act was the main cause of the Civil War. This was when the south forced the north to catch any runaway slaves. Even if they just let the slave go through there property there is a high chance they could still get caught. When they get caught for not catching the slave they get fined 30,000 dollars in today's money. If they were to catch a slave and then have it run away it would be a 100,000 dollar fine.
Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state or a free state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress orchestrated a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas. The north’s reaction towards the MIssouri Compromise was that they condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of
The economies were running different and the laws were placed using their different views. The Sought was pro slavery and the North was anti-slavery. They didn’t want any slaves in their section but
‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .
The controversy over the expansion of slavery into western territory contributed greatly to the coming of the Civil War. The battle between the North and the South of maintaining the balance of free states and slave states. Many compromises have appeased yet pushed back the inevitable Civil War. In 1804 Jefferson was elected for his second term, and a year before that America had bought Louisiana.
The north and the south had always had disagreements but they became more serious as manifest destiny settled in. In document 9 it says “Prior to manifest destiny and the expansion west the politics and economics concerned only the Northern and Southern states. The North had industrialized and in the process changing the way things were made from hand and home-made to machine and factory made. The South was agrarian and a large grower of cotton. With the invention of the cotton gin in 1793 and invention of textile machinery, it created a need for a greater labor force increasing the slave trade in the south.
Another issue that comes up around the American Civil War is the issue of state sovereignty. Specifically the 10th amendment reserves the powers not specifically given to the federal government to the state or the people. Since control over the slave trade is not specifically mentioned in the constitution, it is natural to conclude that the states where free to decide for themselves whether they would be free or slave holding. However abolitionist states tried to push legislation through congress to ban slavery.
However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.
To a greater extent, slavery was the greatest cause of the outbreak of the civil war in 1860. Disputes of slavery caused economic and political troubles between the northern and southern states leading up to the civil war. The fact the the northern and southern states were different in almost every way caused them to turn out like completely different territories, one of their greatest differences was the fact that most southern states economy relied on hard labour, agricultural jobs like tobacco in Maryland, and cotton in Virginia; this caused their economy to be more based on the labour of slaves than the more developed territories in the north (Harrold), who after this time was starting to not need the slave labour in their territories because after early 1800’s, the industrial revolution had been spreading to America, and the country developed very quickly. But in this expansion, only the north states were getting the effect of the industrial revolution, meaning the north would not need slave
The Southern and Northern states differentiate on many issues, which ultimately led them towards a Civil War. There stood deep social, economic, and political disparities between the North and the South. These modifications stemmed from the understanding of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, most of these disputes about the rights of states directed to the Civil War. There existed reasons other than slavery on behalf of the South 's breakaway.