Thousands of people die each year from auto accidents. Many deaths caused by speeding leave families devastated. “Speeding accidents about as popular as drinking and driving accidents” (Boyles). Speed limits is supposedly what keeps us safe while out on the road. Many people think that they do not need to follow the speed limit signs.
Many crimes such as murder and theft gain a lot of attention if committed, but things like speeding past the speed limit are also a crime, so they should gain attention as well, if committed. Frank Trippett, in his excerpt, says that “It is painfully apparent today that millions of Americans…..are taking increasing liberties with all sorts of ‘minor’ laws…”. He says that Americans ignore certain laws over others, because their impact is much less than that of something like rape or murder. However, these laws’ punishments are not as great as other crimes’ punishments, therefore making them seem less significant. The “foundations of social order are profoundly shaken...when citizens take a skirting to the law”(Trippett) is not as true as you may think.
Although most people like to believe driving while using a handheld device should not be illegal, it is actually true that driving while using an handheld device should be illegal. Allowing people to drive around while using their handheld cellphones while on the road would not be safe. People would abuse this option and use their phone while on the road. Car accident rates would increase and many lives would be lost, or effected. Enforcing this law will, too some extent, force people to put their full attention on the road.
(Chandler, 2013) Customers have greater access to products so they can choose between, for example, a cheap more polluting car and a more expensive non-polluting car. Also, there is more competition so Tesla needs to distinguish itself from other companies by focusing on CSR. An emerging force that may reshape CSR in the future might be climate change. In order to diminish climate change as much as possible, corporate social responisibility is very important.
However, it is argued driving age should not be raised because it takes the teenagers freedom away, and it is unimportant to drive in a specific age, everyone should have enough skills to drive without having difficulties.
These may incorporate equivocal driving strategies like hard halting to alter course of your auto rapidly, These classes and preparing are not for apprentices but rather for specific professions and the individuals who are keen on taking their driving capacities to the following level. These classes as a rule incorporate classroom and driving track preparing and most recent a day to a few days relying upon the profundity of data to be instructed. There are likewise forte driving schools like those that show truck driving. These classes are engaged more on the understudy getting enough street time and learning to end up a truck driver. These schools concentrate on the vocation part of their preparation and work to give all the data important to the understudy to take and breeze through all state confirmation driving tests.
Over the last twenty-two years, there have been more than 130,000 fatal teen crashes. Though these teenagers are legal, trained drivers, what is a solution to reduce the number of lives lost due to these lethal car crashes? Scientists believe that the solution to reducing the amount of deaths would be to raise the driving age and enforce stricter driving laws. Parents, however, are against raising the driving age as they would have to drive their teenager to the movies for a longer period of time. Thus, the driving age should be raised to twenty due to the maturity of people’s brains and understanding of consequences rather than depending on emotions and desires.
Every year, more than 5000 teens die due to car accident so upgrading the driving age gives meaning and would reduce accidents. However, driving age should be raised to twenty in order to benefit both the personal interest and community interest. Personal interest is the primary reason why driving age should be raised to twenty. So the teenagers are the main benefit because of many reasons but unfortunately they would take subject of raise driving age as a punishment. Raise driving age would save teenagers lives.
says.¨ This here is a city that is over polluted because of technological issues. Cars ruin our atmosphere and we don 't need advancements in technology if all it is going to do is hurt us and cause deaths. The world would be a much more peaceful place without knowing so much, as we wouldn 't be making harmful things that will ruin our grandchildrens lives. Today knowing
By allowing her to continue to drive recklessly would not be in the greatest good of others but only of her. Therefore, the officer doing their job and issuing her a ticket is protecting the public from harm which is in the greatest happiness for the greatest
The other 96% are continuing adding to our pollution and waste of resource. To make a big impact on our environment more than 50% should contribute. Cars and factories play a big role in our pollution, causing Global Warming. People don’t notice the way they take advantage of transportation. Seeing people walk to a 2 min store destination is never seen, people prefer to drive their vehicles.
Communications of the ACM, 58(8), 19-20. This article talks about the moral challenge between driverless cars and drivable cars. The article introduces how driverless cars can out preform normal cars because, the driverless car will have greater perceptive abilities, better reaction times, and will not suffer from distractions (from eating or texting, drowsiness, or physical emergencies such as a driver having a heart attack or a stroke). Also the article states that 90% of crashes are due to human