Standardized tests are becoming less of the norm for students as colleges recognize that they could be a poor resource for college admissions. They have been around since 1875 and should be altered to conform to today's society. Students' futures should not revolve around these exams. Although standardized tests improve equity when applying for college, these exams should not be the center of the school's curriculum because schools are unable to prepare teachers, leaving the students with unnecessary stress and poor achievement.
Teachers are not prepared to teach everything that standardized tests require you to know. “Up to half of [The Teacher's] salary will be tied to how the students performed on their tests” (Williams 2). This should
…show more content…
For some, these exams are a deciding factor in whether or not they go to college. Therefore the stress builds up. “An individual's score may vary from day to day, due to testing conditions or the test taker's mental or emotional state” (Henningfeld 3). The more stress a student endures, the worse they will do on these tests. There is nothing that can prepare a student to take these assessments. “We’ve asked test scores to carry ever more weight” (Harris 3). With the No Child Left Behind Act coming into play through 2015, now called The Every Student Succeeds Act, standardized testing became the center of students' lives. From the time they were in elementary school taking those exams, to high school, where these tests can determine their future, students never catch a break. Everybody tests differently, not everyone deals well under the pressure of a timed exam, creating unreliable data. “Standardized tests inadvertently create incentives for students to become superficial thinkers” (Harris 3). Students begin to give up and look for quick and obvious answers due to the lack of understanding or care for these exams. Studies show that those with high standardized test scores tend to carry these superficial thinking characteristics. This shows that scores do not measure one's knowledge because those …show more content…
“There is too little information to produce accurate, comprehensive or detailed results” (Henningfeld 2). A teacher or college needs more than a test score to ensure a student's intelligence. Many other categories go into knowing how a student will perform in their academics. categories that standardized tests cannot measure, such as creativity, critical thinking, and motivation. All of these factors help define achievement. Achievement is “all outcomes that students and teachers attain” (Harris 3). A student's achievement includes all of the aspects of school like your Grade point average, class participation, and motivation to get your work done. Your achievements build up over time; they cannot be represented through a test where you circle the best answer choice. “Multiple choice tests are very poor yardsticks of student performance” (Henningfeld 5). There are no writing skills involved, math work to be shown, or any proof of understanding the material. In the end, teachers cannot rely on a score, and most teachers do not use them to evaluate a student. A teacher's job is to work with students and figure out how they learn best so that they can adjust to every student's learning style, but standardized tests fail to provide information on how a student
Many people have different opinions on whether or not standardized testing should be continued. There have been many disagreements on if standardized tests accurately measure student accomplishments or if they have helped students in the long-run. Numerous teachers do not like “teaching to the test”. Even students are tired of being deprived creativeness in the classroom and they are only learning certain objectives that
Many students are smart and understand the content, but it doesn't show on test scores (Gregory J. Cizek, 2001). In essence, testing brings out stress in even the brightest of students, messing with their heads come test day. The facts show that from the 50 states, 700 school districts claim that standardardized tests are causing greater anxiety than the average everyday assessments (Joseph Spector, 2015). In conclusion, student achievement
In fact, the increasing use of standardized testing will do more damage than good, because of its failure to capture the entirety of a student’s body of work. Furthermore, the overwhelming stress that the United States government, and school systems have placed on the usage of standardized tests has become detrimental to American education, and is not the most effective way to gauge the intelligence of American students. The American educational system should be fixated on providing each child enough attention and information so they can succeed in that class and in the future. However, the increasing focus on having to pass a standardized test has blinded schools of the real goal, because they are required to get their students to pass the standardized tests.
The fact that standardized test can decide one’s future intensifies the pressure bestowed on a high school student. Many people have different opinions towards these type of exams, ranging from college admissions required to use these exams for their admission process to some arguing against these exams not being an accurate measure of one’s true potential. Standardized testing in the college admissions process does not clearly emphasize a student’s knowledge and intelligence. I believe that these exams should not remain as an important factor in admissions decisions. The elimination of exam scores will create a fair admissions process, it will also help those who can’t afford the price these exams can cost, and will relieve the stress of many students.
Standardized tests are very common in today’s modern society. They are used as a tool to measure a person’s performance and indicate how their estimated performance will be in a college class. Every year hundreds of students take the ACT or SAT in order to get accepted into their college of choice and to receive scholarships, but they fail to see the problems with these standardized tests. As more and more people take these tests, the national average score falls causing doubt in the extremely important system. This is leading people to question whether or not the ACT and SATs are accomplishing what they were created to do.
These limitations highlight the need for an alternative form of assessment that can capture a more diverse set of student learning outcomes. As such, the narrow focus of standardized testing may lead to an ineffective evaluation approach, which undermines the goal of education or prepares students for success in various contexts. While standardized tests offer a perspective of student performance in a limited number of areas, they should not be relied upon as the core measure of student
Introduction Attention Grabber: If you are not good at taking tests, does it mean that you are not going to be successful? The test is just a number who can be alternated whether you cheap it or not and how focused you were when taking it. As students, teachers, and parents, we are all familiar with the concept of standardized testing. However, have you ever stopped to consider whether or not these tests are actually necessary or beneficial? Today, I want to discuss why I believe standardized testing should be eliminated in our education system.
The accountability of the scores is meant to encourage teachers to adopt better and more effective methods of teaching, as well as to urge students to work harder. However the effects are more detrimental. Because of testing, students are more likely to be frustrated and discouraged at having to move so fast to cover all the ground needed. If a student is having a bad day or just is not a good test taker, all anyone can say is “tough luck.” The teachers will only focus on the select subjects tested on, and then only the select aspects they believe will be covered in the testing.
School’s are using standardized testing for the wrong reason. “A standardized test is any examination that’s administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. There are two major kinds of standardized tests: aptitude tests and achievement tests” (Popham, 1999). The most common examples of aptitude tests are the SAT and the
Standardized tests provide a great measurement of progress for students and without them, that data would be harder to obtain. Standardized tests hold schools accountable for students’ learning. Churchill claims, “Standardized exam data remains the best way to hold schools accountable for their academic performance.” These tests provide a gauge for parents and administrators to see how the students in each class are doing. Standardized tests evaluate what students have learned from what is required.
The room is silent, cold, and bleak and the anxiety in the air could be cut with a knife. It is hard to imagine another time in anyone’s life when they will be under these same circumstances and required to take a test. There is little to nothing about this experience that can be taken and applied to a student’s life in the future. A fundamental reason for attending school is to learn skills that will help growth and success in the future, yet how is standardized testing accomplishing that goal? Students simply spit out answers on multiple-choice questions with no critical thinking or collaboration.
This paper will argue that standardized testing is not an effective way to measure student learning and should not be the sole basis for evaluating student performance. I will begin by defining standardized tests, describing their purpose in the education
These people see standardized testing as inaccurate and a false way of measuring academic achievement. That is only a few of the many things seen as cons for standardized testing. Along with that the tests fail to measure such important aspects such as creativity and critical thinking skills. Studies indicate that standardized tests reward superficial thinking and might discourage more interpretive thinking. Next, as a result of the small fragment of knowledge that is tested, standardized tests capture a incomplete picture of student achievement.
“No pressure!” your math teacher declares as she passes out the third exam that week. You attempt to grasp how to find the area of a circle’s radius from the very back of your brain, but you just can’t remember. Students should have to take less standardized tests. These assessments take up too much time, students and teachers should know how well they are doing without having to take fourteen other tests, and students stress and obsess over testing.
A standardized test, according to W. James Popham of ASCD.org, is “any examination that is administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner.” In standardized testing, examinees are instructed to precisely answer a specific set of questions, which are usually multiple-choices. Although standardized testing is believed to be an objective method to grade students, administers should understand that these tests are not only a waste of time, but also a waste of money. Standardized testing is irrelevant to a student’s education because it is an unreliable way to measure a student’s knowledge, causes stress, and hinders a student’s overall learning potential.