John Paul II’s Centesimus Annus
Inspired by Rerum Novarum, John Paul II intervened in the discussion of social justice. John Paul II wrote in favor of the worker and sought just resolutions to unemployment and poverty. “In his first chapter, the pope invites us to re-read Rerum Novarum and apply it to our own day (3). The “new things” about which Pope Leo XIII wrote are a new form of property (capital) and a new form of labor (wages),” (Medaille). To understand Centesimus Annus, one must first understand Rerum Novarum.
Dignity of the Human Person Man is the Way of the Church embodies Centesimus Annus. The Catholic Social teaching is directed toward Man, who is the core of society. The Church is concerned with the dignity of the human person, whether he is rich or poor. “The social teaching of the Church is not a theory but a basis for action; the witness of actions gives credibility to the teachings, and this concerns not only material poverty, but cultural and spiritual poverty as well (57),” (Medaille). Man’s call to
…show more content…
However, man had already begun to abuse the power he had by decreasing the value of man and increasing the value of materials. John Paul II rejected materialism as the conflict between capital and labor grew. “The new things”, capital and labor inspired John Paul to write and defend workers against the violation of human rights. The new ways of life transformed the meaning of labor into making man the machine. It disregarded the dignity of the labor. John Paul II explained how man does the opposite of his calling because he abuses his power to co-create. “Instead of carrying out his role as a co-operator with God in the work of creation, man sets himself up in place of God and thus ends up provoking a rebellion on the part of nature, which is more tyrannized than governed by him.76,” (C.A.37). This is the exact opposite of justice and economic
This book describes two of the transforming events in America’s economic life, the Homestead Strike and the evolution of Carnegie Steel Company into United States Steel Corporation. Les Standiford frames the events and clash of wills of Carnegie and Frick in the moral framework of Weber’s analysis of the Protestant ethic which some believe gave moral self-justification to those captains of industry. This book views the Homestead Strike through the prism of the personalities and values of two titans of that era, Carnegie and Frick. Did Carnegie, the older, wealthier and more visible, hold the higher moral ground? Standiford declares no winner.
In Jon Sweeney’s lecture and book, “ When Saint Francis Saved The Church”, he spoke about Francis leading a revolutionary life. There were two points that helped support with Francis leading a revolutionary life. Those points were friendship and poverty. Sweeney spoke about how important friendship and poverty was to Francis. These points helped with Francis learning what kind of person he would be and do with his life.
He wrote "The Gospel of Wealth”. 2. This text is about the ‘evolution of labor’. It talked a little on how labor and capital fight and how they should combine. 3.
“The Gospel of Wealth” is an article written by Andrew Carnegie in the June of 1889. It describes the responsibility of philanthropy by the new upper class of self-made rich. We are studying about the Guiled age which was the last few decades of the nineteenth. It was a period of transformation in the economy, technology, government, and social customs of America.
In his famous Cross of Gold speech, Bryan uses a religious element to discuss the labour theory of economics and to illustrate the moral decline of the government. The true Americans are the “hardy pioneers who have braved all the dangers of the wilderness, who have made the desert to blossom as the rose- the pioneers away out there who rear their children near to Nature’s heart”. Not the … “few financial magnates who, in a back room, corner the money of the world”(811). This is what Bryan considers a problem in the United States. The true businessmen, the farmers and miners, who use their God-given talents, muscle and brain, to create wealth are being overlooked by the capitalists who call themselves businessmen.
The business guys were very self-centered and didn’t care about the well-being of their employees. They demanded an abundant amount of back breaking work from their employee with no incentives for them. Many workers were getting annoyed with their bosses and wanted a change from them. the occurrence of The Working Man’s Prayer is a sarcastic critique of Andrew Carnegie’s philanthropy. In this critique, it is said how Carnegie lowers the pay of workers, how the workers are compared to slaves, and it says Carnegie spends workers’ wages in pleasuring himself with travels and goods.
In a time where America’s economy was at its low, much work was necessary to rebuild the economy. Those times are revolutionary in history because they are crucial to development, during WWI a lot of progress was achieved, most of it at expenses of peoples lives and believes. However, that is not the case of Henry Ford Model T car and overall work practices. It is true that people made great fortune at expense of others misfortune, but I don’t believe that is enough reason for us to generalize.
Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his Discourse on Inequality and Social Contract each attempt to explain the rise of and prescribe the proper management of human society. At the foundation of both philosophies is the principle that humans are asocial by nature, a precept each philosopher interprets and approaches in a different way. Hobbes states that nature made humans relatively “equal,” and that “every man is enemy to every man.” Life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” he says, and “every man has right to everything.” Rousseau outlines primitive asocial man having “everything necessary for him to live in the state of nature” from “instinct alone,” and being “neither good nor evil.”
This study will discuss the rationalization of the body as it was depicted in the works of Max Weber and Michel Foucault. Both of them have widely discussed the issue from different perspectives. This paper will attempt to bring out the points on which the two thinkers would agree or disagree in their opinions regarding the rationalization of the body. In this paper I will argue that both Weber and Foucault had some common ideas as they tried to deal with rationalization of the body and the individuation of the body, even though both appear to be in quite different points.
Spending their wealth on luxurious items was seen to be disrespectful to God and as a result people expected to pour their earnings into their callings. This has close ties with the capitalist ethic. From this ethic, according to Weber, a system of capitalism emerged that no longer required ascetic values to sustain itself. These became the capitalist spirit. Working hard and worshiping, activities held in high regards by Protestants contributed to what we seen in contemporary society as being the capitalist ethic.
As a whole, during the Gilded Age “the middle and upper-middle class seemed to be becoming, in part as a result of its wartime experience, less sensitive to the suffering and hardship of the poor” (Ginzberg 207). Subsequently, “[m]iddle-class Protestantism became increasingly defensive of privilege, insensitive to the poor, and harsh towards efforts to change from within” (Ginzberg 207). In fact, “[m]any ministers came to endorse a corporate defense of property and expressed hostility to labor organizing” and it was believed that in no place “did the business spirit find greater favor than in the Protestant church” (Ginzberg 207). Similarly, Carter finds that the Gilded Age “was a time when the gospel of Christ was felt to be in full harmony with the Gospel of Wealth” (Ginzberg 207 fix citation). Had it been religion that shaped the morals of the people during the Gilded Age then the protestant church still would have reflected the same “self giving love seen in Christ” (Latourette 83) that christianity was built on.
Here Barker effectively uses scripture to build a full spectrum framework of poverty and how alleviate
Fermelita Borre AB1213 Rochelle Igot Philosophical Research Paper What is Alienation? In this paper, we will evaluate alienation and its premises as presented in “Estranged Labor” by Karl Marx. Although the entirety of the arguments he presented in his manuscript were substantial, there was a flaw in one of the arguments he presented in the types of of alienation, the estrangement of the worker from the activity of production.
Besides Jesus, Paul, who called himself as an Apostle, was influential in the beginning of Christianity. People even claimed him as the “founder of Christianity”. Paul was the one that brought Jesus’s message to the world. He went on three missionary journeys, and the fourth journey to Rome in order to spread Christian faith and the development of its various institutions. In addition of his responsible of geographically and culturally expanding Christian movement, he also extended it as well as ethnic lines.
“Do good and avoid evil” is a result of the differing educational, religious and cultural influences on man in the various times and places of his historical development. Thomas Aquinas contended that general principles of the natural law cannot be applied to all men in the same way on the great variety of human affairs, thus arises the diversity of positive laws among various people. Human laws deal with changing and contingent matters and often with singulars, do not have the certitude that belongs to the speculative sciences. Each has its own realm of operation and is sufficient that each have the certitude proper to its own realm. [ Ibid. ]