ipl-logo

Terrorism: A Critique Of Excuses

1055 Words5 Pages

In the Ethical Life, by Russ Shafer-Landau, chapters written by Michael Walzer and Alan Dershowitz express their knowledge and opinions on the topics of terrorism and torture. Is it possible to justify and defend such acts? In the chapter “Terrorism: A Critique of Excuses”, author Michael Walzer shuts down four excuses that attempt to justify terrorism. In the chapter, “Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured?”, Alan Dershowitz defends his theory that it is necessary to torture a terrorist if that means saving the lives of innocent people while protecting their civil liberties and human rights at the same time. Terrorism can never be moral because it violates all “excuses” and torture is an acceptable tactic to save lives. The four excuses that attempt to justify terrorism are as follows: terrorism is a last resort that is only used when all else fails, terrorism is the only possibility for weak movements, whatever works for a good cause, such as terrorism, is morally acceptable, and that all politics involves terrorism. In the first excuse of terrorism being the last resort, Walzer explains that in order for this to be a legitimate excuse, one must have exhausted all political and military possibilities to resolve their issue. However, there is no way to interview the terrorist to prove that they have …show more content…

Dershowitz argues that there are two ways to deal with a ticking bomb terrorist, besides doing nothing and letting innocent people die. These options include continuing to torture behind closed door or to utilize torture and make this information open to the

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Torture's Terrible Toll By John Mccain

    848 Words  | 4 Pages

    Dershowitz says that if a call needed to be made and a terrorist needed to be tortured in the case of a "ticking time bomb" that " We all agree that this should be a decision made at the highest level possible- by the president or the Secretary of Defense, if there is time to have such a dreadful decision made by accountable public figures" (Dershowitz

    Read More

  • Bob Brecher's Argument Analysis

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    Bob Brecher’s argument is centered around being a counter-claim to Dershowitz’ Ticking Bomb scenario. The counter-claim argues that a ticking bomb scenario, as described by Dershowtiz, is unlikely to occur in the real world, due to the difficulty in apprehending a terrorist after the terrorist plot has been set in motion, but has not yet been fully executed. Even if the authorities are lucky enough to apprehend the suspect before the ticking bomb has been set to detonate, it is improbable that torture would result in the suspect revealing the plot before the bomb goes off. Brecher additionally argues that Dershowitz’ idea of using legalized torture warrants to limit torture would, on the contrary, lead to the abuse of the torture warrant system.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture's Terrible Toll, By John Mccain

    699 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of CIA Torture

    1579 Words  | 7 Pages

    Pro-CIA Torture To begin, the US and it’s central intelligence agency, also known as the CIA are torturing captives, and it’s up for debate. The US should allow the CIA to torture its prisoners. It’s a way to get very valuable information from them. The torture techniques leave no marks or traces left behind on the victim. It strikes fear in the to be tortured prisoners so that they make talk before the CIA even lays a finger on them.

    Read More

  • Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

    686 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Case for Torture Wins Torture is it morally acceptable? Many have debated this argument but I would like to bring up two main conflicting view points from Michael Levin, and Marzieh Ghisai. Michael Levin is a Jewish law professor who wrote The Case for Torture where he advocates where torture is acceptable in some circumstances.

    Read More

  • Ethical Arguments Against Torture

    1032 Words  | 5 Pages

    Krauthammer’s main arguments to justify torture centers on the ticking-bomb scenario, which occurs when the interrogator only has a few minutes to find out the location of an attack or the place of the bomb (Moser et al. 2016). Krauthammer argues that there is no

    Read More

  • Terrorism Is Rational Choice Model

    842 Words  | 4 Pages

    The researcher also argued that rationality should be differentiated one the decision making level. Although these individuals decisions making might be rational on their own, these behaviors may still lead to unpredictable a uniform irrational behavior at the group level of the organization. Although the decision making process of terrorist organizations are intricate, the final decision making process involving attacks are not always the product of a rational decision process. The final decisions of terrorist attacks are normally the result of the individual decisions, providing no assurance on the rationality of the result even if the objectives of the individual do not contend with one

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the reading “The Case for Torture” written by Michael Levin, and published on the June 7th, 1982 edition of Newsweek. Levin argues in favor of torture as an acceptable way of obtaining information when innocent lives are at stake. Outlining three separate scenarios devised to make the reader reconsider the stance on torturer in order to protect the interest of those in the western area. The strength of this text is that the absence of reasoning does not strike the reader; he is overcome by Levin’s ability to break ethical decisions down to black and white. Levin begins with describing torture as “morally mandatory”.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture Myth '

    1050 Words  | 5 Pages

    While analyzing “The Torture Myth” and “The Case for Torture”, it is very clear to see the type of rhetorical appeals used to persuade the audience. Anne Applebaum, the writer of “The Torture Myth” --in context of the decision of electing a new Attorney General--would argue that torture is very seldomly effective, violates a person’s rights, and should be outlawed due to the irrational need upon which physical torture is used. On the other hand, Michael Levin strongly argues that physical torture is crucial to solving every imminent danger to civilians. Levin claims that if you don’t physically torture someone, you are being weak and want to allow innocent people to die over something that could have been simply done.

    Read More

  • V For Vendetta Justified Terrorism

    1416 Words  | 6 Pages

    V and Justified Terrorism After seeing the depredation and adversity that terrorism attacks induced, it is of no surprise that terrorism should be viewed with disgust by people. But is terrorism never justified? This question is raised by the action-thriller V for Vendetta, a film directed by James McTeigue and written by the Wachowski Brothers, subject to a graphic novel of the same title. The film illustrates the protagonist V, who uses terrorist approaches to fight against an authoritarian regime that has taken control of Britain sometime in the near future.

    Read More

  • Techniques Used In Michael Levin's The Case For Torture

    515 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture”, he uses many cases of emotional appeal to persuade the reader that torture is necessary in extreme cases. There are many terms/statements that stick with the reader throughout the essay so that they will have more attachment to what is being said. Levin is particularly leaning to an audience based in the United States because he uses an allusion to reference an event that happened within the states and will better relate to the people that were impacted by it. The emotional appeals used in this essay are used for the purpose of persuading the reader to agree that in extreme instances torture is necessary and the United States should begin considering it as a tactic for future cases of extremity. One major eye catching factor of this essay is the repetitive use of words that imply certain stigmas.

    Read More

  • Ethical Theory Of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 2003 the US military relied on the confession taken from Sheikh al-Libi in which it was claimed that Iraq supplied both chemical and biological weapons to Al Qaeda. This testimony was used in the month leading up to the invasion of Iraq. Later al-Libi retracted his statement saying that he did so in order to make the torture stop. This is a clear example of the ineffectiveness of torture and the bad consequences it can often produce. The CIA had forgotten its own conclusion, sent to congress in 1989, that ‘inhumane physical or psychological techniques are counterproductive because they do not produce intelligence and will probably result in false answers.’

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

    971 Words  | 4 Pages

    The author believes that the thoughts of enlightened societies are unwise and ascertains that there are situations whereby torture becomes morally mandatory in dealing with terrorists.

    Read More

  • Violence Begets Violence: Tactics Of Terrorism

    1855 Words  | 8 Pages

    Violence Begets Violence With terrorism being such a frequently used ubiquitous term, it is in utmost consequence to define the term accurately. How we understand the connotation of terrorism can determine how we choose to actively respond to it. Terrorism as defined by the CIA is “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents. Those who employ terrorism, regardless of their specific secular or religious objectives, strive to subvert the rule of law and effect change through violence and fear. ”(CIA)

    Read More

  • Cause And Effect Of Terrorism Essay

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    Terrorism causes fear all across the world. People are terrified because of what happens in these attacks. There are many different kinds of fear caused by terrorist attacks. Some react to these attacks differently than others. Many react to these attacks in a constructive and rational matter, this helps to not give the terrorists what they want.

    Read More

More about Terrorism: A Critique Of Excuses

Open Document