ipl-logo

The Argumentative Essay: The Impeachment Of Bill Clinton

528 Words3 Pages

Impeachment is a very precisely defined term in the constitution that is very vaguely backed up. Although it is clear what the levy of impeachment imposes, the standards in which one can be charged against are not very clear. This is why the 1998 Clinton impeachment trial was one of the most controversial trials in our nation’s history. The House of Representatives voted faintly in favor of a trial of the impeachment of our 42nd president, Bill Clinton. Clinton was accused on multiple charged, perjury and the obstruction of administrative justice. Upon these charges, I believe Bill Clinton should have been impeached. Expert witnesses- professors Mark Nelson and Sarah Bradley both portrayed very persuasive arguments; however, upon viewing the …show more content…

The oath of office requires that they must abide by the constitution, carry out laws, and uphold honesty, virtue, and honor. When one is implementing this, they are being sworn in. Bradley stated that no person shall choose when to keep the truth under oath. This statement keeps the charter for not only our idea of the frame of morality, but just simply ethics. Rather than successfully doing his job by executing laws and and abiding by the constitution, Clinton attempted to cheat his the courts and his trial. Upon Jones’ deposition, she claims that he would use his authority as a governor to recompense women who had sexual relations with him. I conjecture that although this was just a statement from her deposition, one who uses his power in office to reward women should be impeached.

The perspective of both professors greatly influenced by opinion on whether former president Bill Clinton should be impeached. Upon reviewing both arguments, a summary on facts of the impeachment process, and a summary of the case- Bill Clinton should have been impeached. Although controversial, this is strictly my opinion. One who swears himself to stand by the constitution and to take the position as Chief enforcing officer of the United States should surely be impeached upon being committed of acts of perjury and obstruction of administrative

Show More
Related

  • Caldwell Incarceration Case Study

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    2. Whether Caldwell’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence sustaining one of his convictions for conspiracy is adequately preserved for appellate

    Read More

  • Statement On The Articles Of Impeachment By Barbara Jordan

    393 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: in Barbara Jordan’s “Statement on the Articles of Impeachment” In 1976, the first African American Congresswoman took the podium to address the political problems in the U.S. She used every form of document in the constitution to prove that things can change if they were followed accordingly. This courageous woman, Barbara Jordan, wrote “Statements on the Articles of Impeachment”, delivered July 25, 1974 to the House Judiciary Committee and argued that if the President was to participate in anything suspicious and kept the person safe, he may be impeached. Jordan builds her credibility with the evidence of Richard Nixon’s activity with several things beyond out of order; during her speech she was forcefully optimistic

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Can We End The Division By Cherome Clemente

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the nation’s motto may mean “one from many,” two of the greatest and earliest presidential figures were insulting each other in becoming president, and stating ideas that ruined the other’s credibility from things that did not matter as a political figure. This showed although the two were competing for politics, they were dividing each other even further by going to their personal life and insulting. Lastly as seen in society, “An honest disagreement about principles or issues seems to be increasingly hard to find. Instead, what we have are ‘facts’ that are nothing more than lies that fit with preconceived prejudices” (Clemente 6). With the Jefferson versus Adams case as an example to fit the above statement, this is showing that a lot of what we believe is lies than truths in hopes of allowing the public to take a stance.

    Read More

  • Barbara Jordan Role In The Watergate Proceedings

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another notable speech by Jordan was on July 27, 1974, in which she spoke about the importance of the impeachment process as a means of holding government officials accountable for their actions. She said, "The impeachment process is about restoring, not overthrowing, the Constitution. The impeachment process is about a quest for the truth, not a search for scapegoats. The impeachment process is about the Constitution, not about politics. " Jordan's speeches were widely praised for their clear and powerful rhetoric, and they helped to establish her as a leading figure in the impeachment

    Read More

  • How Was Andrew Johnson Get Impeached?

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    Did you know he was the first president to ever get impeached? After he vetoed the “Freemans Bureau” bill, the members of Congress overthrew the veto and he was sent to court for impeachment. Apparently, he was found innocent and after he was removed from the presidency, he decided to get re-elected for the Senate. He completed 2 tasks before he got impeached.

    Read More

  • Us Vs Nixon Essay

    485 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones should have had the same outcome from the Supreme Court. Both, former President 's violated the law and wanted to use presidential privileges to dismiss their cases. In the United States v. Nixon, the Court had the right to order the President to relinquish the tapes to Congress to use as evidence for the trial against the seven members held accountable. Those accused were owed a duty by the Court to be given a fair and speedy trial. In the Clinton v. Jones case, the Court should have not granted the former President Clinton immunity because the general public needs to realize that not even the President can violate the law and get away with it.

    Read More

  • Does The Watergate Scandal: Impeachful

    2170 Words  | 9 Pages

    Impeachment is still used today as we know and so far no other president had to be impeached ,but we hope that one won’t have to be impeached for awhile. To conclude, the impeachment process is a very big thing today and impeaching a

    Read More

  • Richard Nixon's Impeachment Analysis

    1748 Words  | 7 Pages

    the president by majority vote for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.  After going from the house, two-thirds of the Senate must approve this request within the presence of the chief justice of the Supreme Court. o There have only been two successful impeachments in the history of the United States.  Andrew Johnson went against his own party in terms of policies regarding the Reconstruction era after the North won the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Reconstruction Dbq

    1243 Words  | 5 Pages

    Johnson allegedly violated one of these laws, the Tenure of Office Act, by dismissing the Secretary of War. Congress felt the need to impeach him. Radical leaders felt President Johnson himself was an obstacle in their plans and felt that impeachment was the only option. The House of Representative voted eleven articles of impeachment against Johnson. In 1868 he was tried by the Senate in the spring and was acquitted of all charges by one vote.

    Read More

  • The President's Failure To Impeach In The United States

    152 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the U.S Constitution, it states that if President is convicted of any treason, corruption, or any other high Crimes and transgressions they can be removed from office. However, there are many steps to being impeach. The first thing in order for the President to be impeach is when the situation of the President brings attention to the members of the House of Representatives. Next, they are handed over to the House Judiciary Committee to see if the situation is serious. If the situation is serious then the president would be presented to the U.S Senate to decide if he should be impeached.

    Read More

  • Barbara Jordan We The People Speech Analysis

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    The water gates scandal is why President Nixon was being impeached but he resigned before the house voted on the Articles hence Nixon was not impeached during the

    Read More

  • Charles Colson Should Plead Guilty For Ellsberg Trial

    857 Words  | 4 Pages

    Upon the discovery of the break-in, those in close operation with Nixon faced the various charges from committing and covering up the crimes that became known as the Watergate scandal. It is an undisputed fact that Charles Colson participated in defaming Ellsberg by hiring E. Howard Hunt to find slanderous information on him. Some people believe Colson should not plead guilty in the Ellsberg trial’s charges, while others feel he should plead guilty. Colson should plead guilty to the Ellsberg trial’s charges given three reasons: it dismisses Colson’s

    Read More

  • Barbara Nixon Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    I think Barbara Jordan did a great job defining impeachment and clarifying its criteria. In her speech, Jordan discusses impeachment and states, “We know the nature of impeachment. We’ve been talking about it a while now. It is chiefly designed for the President and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. It is designed to “bridle” the Executive if he engages in excesses.

    Read More

  • Hillary Clinton Watergate Scandal Research Paper

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    While secretary of state, current presidential runner, Hillary Clinton used her private email to send and receive classified information. She later wiped her computer, denied doing so, had her people plead the 5th in court, and continued lying to the American public regarding this issue. Recently the FBI launched an investigation into the scandal, and since then, they have found dozens of Clintons emails deemed to be classified. There are very few events comparable to Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. One of the most commensurate events to Hillary’s ignominy is President Nixon’s Watergate Scandal.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of A Sorry Speech

    415 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bill Clinton I Am Profoundly Sorry speech Partner Analyzing Essay An apology said right can bring forgiveness, said wrong can bring more remorse. Though it was effective, Bill Clinton's apology did not bring complete forgiveness. Bill Clinton’s remarkable “Profoundly Sorry” speech, which lead to the impeachment of the president, is effective because it uses repetition, ethos, and pathos.

    Read More

More about The Argumentative Essay: The Impeachment Of Bill Clinton

Open Document