War is a cruel and brutal thing. It’s something that the human race has been doing for thousands of years. It changes people and it changes culture. In war, we often think about the lives lost and the key points in winning the war. Some things people often forget about during war is art. In the film, “The Monuments Men,” we get a good understanding about what happened of pieces of art during World War II. This is my view on the film, “The Monument Men.” The film begins with Frank Stokes, played by George Clooney, talking to the President about getting a small group of men to go find important pieces of art like Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” and “Last Supper,” Jan van Eyck’s “Ghent Altarpiece,” and Michelangelo’s “Madonna of Bruges.” …show more content…
I loved the story that was told. The fact that relatable, everyday artists were sent to Europe to find famous pieces of art tells a lot about us as humans. The movie often went from one character to another and it was very confusing to determine where this character was and what they were doing. Besides that, everything else was positive. The best part about the film has to be the set pieces and the actors. Every part of the movie was believable. The random encounters with enemy soldiers and the debris that is scattered everywhere actually gives you the sense of war, not just a scavenger hunt. One scene that really shocked me was when Frank Stokes asks a soldier where a town was and the soldier replied, “You’re standing in it.” All that was around him was collapsed buildings and dirt. It was upsetting to see this because I can’t imagine seeing a town completely wiped out. There were some big name actors in this movie like George Clooney, Bill Murray, Matt Damon, and John Goodman. They made me really like their characters and they did a great job of showing the hard times of war. The film also did a great job of focusing on finding the art. There was such a relief at the end of the film when they finally found the “Madonna of Bruges.” When I was learning about World War II I never once heard of “The Monuments Men.” I truly believe that it’s bad that I am just now finding out about these war heroes. These
I liked the movie better than the book. Reason being is because it was easier to feel the mood in the movie. It was harder to understand the mood in the book than it was in the
It is a powerful view that distinguishes the difference between monuments and memorials everywhere everywhere. If you were to take these monuments down, then you are forgetting that something happened there that was at one point important enough to remember. The monuments serve as reminder of the events that took place in the south, and the people that were fighting for what they believed in. The people that are depicted in them fought honorably and are worth commemorating, even though they lost the war.
Schaffner did a respectable job of accomplishing their mission of perceiving war in a precise fashion. Not only did they paint a vivid picture of what was taking place, the movie showcased the strategic planning that went into the war. He images leaves an impression because of the injuries that were showed during the hospital scenes. The hospital scenes allowed the diverse view on who Patton was as a person and not as a leader. The effect was positive and negative at times which allowed him to be perceived in a distinctive way.
But In “Architect 's Dilemma on Memorials”, an interview of Alison Hirsch, Alison thinks that a good monument is easily accessible and open to offerings. I think a good monument should reflect the importance of why it is there. The monument should use details about the person’s life being honored
It was good as far as WW1 movies can be in my opinion. On the other hand, I am not generally captivated by war, and
As a filmmaker myself, I have a some extra insight into the movie. The way the movie is shot is very much like the time period it was supposed to be set in. The director of the film is
In war, there is no clarity, no sense of definite, everything swirls and mixes together. In Tim O’Brien’s novel named “The Things They Carried”, the author blurs the lines between the concepts like ugliness and beauty to show how the war has the potential to blend even the most contrary concepts into one another. “How to Tell a True War Story” is a chapter where the reader encounters one of the most horrible images and the beautiful descriptions of the nature at the same time. This juxtaposition helps to heighten the blurry lines between concepts during war. War photography has the power to imprint a strong image in the reader’s mind as it captures images from an unimaginable world full of violence, fear and sometimes beauty.
This emphasis on healing is important because it creates the idea that the Wall is a symbol for healing. By representing mending the Monument comforts those who lost people in the war and closes their metaphorical wounds by giving them some closure about their fallen loved ones. By being a symbol of healing the Wall expresses the large amount of lives lost in the
However, these monuments are history and although they may not be suitable for a public place nowadays, they are sure a great piece of history for a museum. These monuments are part of all that is left from a certain period in our history. Even though the Confederate period, for example, is not the period of the United States that many are proud of it still happened and it is still history. These monuments should be saved for the sake of knowing about the past, not for personal gain. Some monuments can stay in public for everyone to see.
Some dismiss it as a shameless work of propaganda, but that’s what I love about it. When movie had stopped and everyone began to shuffle quietly out the white painted doors of the library, I went to the front desk and plopped down a thick book on World War II. And thus, my love affair for both films and history began. I spent the majority of that summer devouring books and films on several historic time periods, from Ancient Greece to the Cold War. When I asked my dad if I could watch Saving Private Ryan, he began to worry that his attempts to introduce me to cinema had worked a bit too
The general idea of the only man on earth pinned against a diseased population was still evident through all the hollywood extras. All in all, I would recommend both book and movie to anyone who
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
It helped develop many of the characters throughout the film. It helps portray the change that Michael Corleone went through. The acting in the film was excellent and the director was able to execute his ideas
It was very exciting seeing events unfold one by one. All-in-all, the movie was very well done. The music was catchy and went along perfectly with the various themes and occurrences in the film, the story line had a good theme and plot, the timeline in which the events took place created drama and excitement for me personally, and the actors and actresses performed astoundingly. I'd have to say that one of my personal favorite parts besides "Edelweiss" was the performance and singing of "Do-Re-Mi. " It's a very happy and catchy song and I personally enjoyed it as one of my favorite parts in the
Monuments Men is a fairly recent film with the premise of a group of soldiers during World War II tasked with protecting the artwork within the continental Europe from those who want to take it. It primarily centers on the story of Frank Stokes, played by George Clooney, and how he is able to assemble a ragtag group of “soldiers” and actually enter the frontlines. Over the course of the story, the group loses a few members, but do manage to discover the stashes of art hidden by Hitler and save it from destruction, including the Ghent Altarpiece and the Lady Madonna. Despite having already watched this movie, is still struck me how much the movie’s message still resonated with me. The movie makes a clear case for the value of art, and I feel