Introduction Inter group conflict has been a issue for a very long time. People from different groups have always seemed to develop conflict. Whether it is racial, age group, culture, religion, sex, gender, class or social group based, conflict occurs when two groups (in group vs out group) have opposing views on something and choose to express that view with it having a negative impact or prejudice view on the opposing group (Binder et. al., 2009). Does interpersonal contact improve relations among groups that are in conflict? This is the question that needs to be answered. Conflict will always be present when two groups have opposing views. However, this does not mean that the relations between groups should be damaged. For example, a couple …show more content…
Some have argued that contact is an essential part of integration between groups and ultimately reducing inter group conflict. Ramiah and Hewstone (2013) claim that if a nation wants ideologies and policies that promote integration and peace; representatives from each group need gather in order to represent their group’s unique needs and their perspectives of their communities. According to Ramiah and Hewstone (2013) peace between groups will require contact. For a nation it will be beneficial to have contact between the political (or appropriate representative) elites from different groups, also between the political elite and members of the public from conflicting groups. In addition there also needs to be contact between members of the public from different groups (Ramiah & Hewstone, 2013). The below quote displays Ramiah and Hewstone’s (2013) view of how contact can reduce inter group conflict and increase public relations from a top down …show more content…
Rather, time, money and resources could be directed to transforming the theory wherein it will be more practical and have actual value in improving relations between conflicting groups across the globe. This review recommends that more focus be given to making the theory as practical as possible so that it may actually reduce/eliminate intergroup conflict and prejudice. As theory on is own is beneficial for our knowledge, it cannot fix the problem without practical implication. Much more research has to be done, as contact is only one part of the solution (Pettigrew,
In the planet, there are different kinds of people who have been co-existing together over the years. The settlement of people in the world is such that different people who come from one tribe tend to settle in a given region where they live together peacefully and carry on with their daily day-to-day activities to improve their livelihoods. However, people from different parts of the world develop some differences between them that result in conflicts among them in some instances. Conflicts can be at different levels such as community conflicts, national conflicts regional conflicts or even global conflicts. The effects of conflicts among people are usually felt by each and every person in the community, and they are usually
Eventually the disagreement would lead to a war over each side's moral and political
Overall, the relationship among races has not changed tremendously over the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, but it has changed. In To
n regards to finding common ground, most people assume that living in a world full of diversity is impossible. Kofi Annan said, “We may have different religions, different languages, different colored skin, but we all belong to one human race.” This statement emphasizes how people are more similar to each other than they may want to believe. Two authors in the unit also argue that individuals should find common ground. In “A Quilt of a Country,” Anna Quindlen argues that a nation made of different races has the possibility of succeeding.
Numerous types of interactions between numerous peoples occur. The question arises whether these interactions are more negative or positive. While some may certainly be positive, I believe such interactions are generally negative. Voluntary racism, involuntary racism, and classism are all factors that account for
Conflict has been around since the beginning of time: Satan tempting Adam and Eve, the Pharaoh and his enslavement of the Israelites, events such as World Wars 1 and 2, et cetera. Creating a conflict is the easy part. Realizing there is a conflict and finding a way to compromise is often the hard part. Unfair working conditions and inequality at Kohler factories in Wisconsin led to the conflict of the 1934 Kohler Strike. This resulted in the compromise of better working conditions.
The model is an element of conflict theory that views racial personality not just as a consequence of negative perception between different racial groups but as a reflection of the competition and conflict between the same groups over power and status. The model roots its argument in a collective group position with the group interest being the driving force that underlie the relation between the groups. Most of the group interest are attached to the beliefs of the members that they have claims to the scarce resources. The attitude of the dominant group towards other racial groups are positional: a term that defines the shape of the sense of the supremacy of the groups over other minority groups. On the other hand, the subordinate group is usually motivated by unfair treatment by the dominant group.
Even in a society that, overall, is diverse, people with similar ideas and experiences tend to congregate in small groups, where they are comfortable. It is much easier to remain in homogenous groups, among those who understand each other. When different groups combine, many different life experiences and points of view will be present and will potentially clash. Misunderstanding is bound to occur in some form when individuals of different backgrounds interact. When misunderstandings occur, people tend to respond with violence, fear, or stereotyping.
Conflict is a common topic in many aspects of life. In history, literature, and day-to-day experiences, you can see conflict around you. There are a few
It is in observing how people deal with and react to conflicts that we see clear differences between cultures. Some cultures view conflict as a positive thing, while others view it as something to be avoided. In the United States, conflict is not usually desirable; nonetheless, conventional wisdom in this country encourages individuals to deal directly with conflicts when they do arise. In fact, face-to-face encounters are usually suggested as the way to work through whatever problems exist. By contrast, in many Asian countries, open conflict is experienced as embarrassing or demeaning.
The theoretical perspectives in the reading discussed functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory. Racial inequality has many aspects and responsibilities surrounding it. Racial inequalitie refers to societal advantages and disadvantages and how it affects different races, which displays functionalism. Symbolic interactionism Displays the social behavior and communication of individuals. Last but not least, the conflict theory discusses the biological, social and cultural categories of race and
Whilst conflict is inevitable Harding provides insight in describing conflict “as the beginning of consciousness”. Realistic group conflict theory (RGCT) offers a behavioural approach to conflict resolution demonstrated in Sheriff Robert Cave’s experiment. RGCT asserts that a real or imagined threat to one’s group interest often leads to conflict. Initially the situation presented with a competitive edge as the groups clamoured for the scarce resource .
Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.
Communication is an inevitable aspect of life. It is an event which happens almost every second of every day. Communication is an act of giving and receiving of information—desires, needs, perceptions, knowledge, etc.—of two or more persons through orthodox or unorthodox methods which can either be intentional or unintentional (de Valenzuela 2002). There are numerous types of communication and one is interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication is one of the communication fields that several studies have focused on.
Don’t we? Second, conflict theorists assume that differences lead to conflict. Differences can also be accepted, tolerated or appreciated. Differences do not necessarily imply conflict. Just think that who cooperate with each other?