" From Instagram to Google to Minecraft, the internet is an extraordinary tool used to make our lives easier in this modern age. With this blessing, comes an extensive responsibility. Being safe online is a top priority when using the internet. Sometimes, though not all people will abide by these suggested guidelines of internet use. Crimes can be committed and people can be bullied. The question is, when these kinds of things happen, should schools and the government have permission to monitor the internet content of users. Due to the utmost importance of safety, the government should have full permission to monitor internet access. The government should have permission access the internet so crime can be stopped. There have been …show more content…
The first amendment says, _ÑÒCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances._Ñù If we let the government have access to our internet, then our rights as citizens of America will not be practiced. However, if the government had zero access to citizens_Ñé internet content, then the government would have no way to track cybercrimes and cyberbullying. Crimes would increase and the internet would become an unsafe place, rather than a tool for …show more content…
No matter how many _ÑÒprivate_Ñù settings are turned on, there is some sort of way that anyone can access it. If the government and schools have access to monitor internet content, then students might learn the lesson that whatever they choose to put online can be accessed by anyone. When students apply for colleges, the college looks at the student_Ñés digital footprint to see if their actions online match up with their application and behavior in school. What we say or do online can be tracked by anyone. If the government has access to student_Ñés online content, then students will have an awareness for creating a desirable digital
The internet has been used to post all the plans of people. Many people post what they are doing or what they are going to do. People in some occasions post to hurt or harm other people. The video of the Virginia shootings posted by Bryce Williams, whose real name is Vester Lee Flanagan and who is thought to be the gunman who killed two of his former co-workers at the television station WDBJ (Manjoo) was publish and it took the police a long time to find him. The government can stop acts of violence and crime if they see everything that happens on the internet and social media.
Should Schools Monitor Students Social Media!?!? Have you ever showed up at school and had a friend or classmate tell you about a rumor directed towards you? I think schools should monitor students social media posts but, only if there seems to be problems occurring and disrupting the class. Cyberbullying can lead to low self esteem and depression, causing worse things. Document E, document B and, document D all agree with limiting/monitoring students online speech.
One Constitutional principle that would be threatened by regulation of the government would be popular sovereignty. Democracy was a government founded for and by the people, and those people would have to vote in their respective states to have this law be implemented. This isn’t really a problem, since Congress or the mayor would have to propose a law that would satisfy the people enough for them to pass it. The government should have sufficient involvement in the internet to ascertain security threats, address security threats, eliminate security threats to the American people. We live
Such as our social media, files, pictures, or videos. Though this information should be used with a good cause on a federal level. The state, and local government should not be able to obtain this right to withhold over their citizens. For this can cause an increased amount of monitoring it's citizens giving them access to our public, and private life. Our private information should only be used for the security of our country.
The whole point of the Fourth Amendment is not to completely stop the police, because the amendment can be waived if an officer has a warrant, or a person’s consent. The Fourth Amendment states that generally a search or seizure is illegal unless there is a warrant, or special circumstances. Technically stating that a citizen is protected by the Fourth Amendment, until a government employee gets a warrant, and then they can invade a citizen’s privacy. Also people state that the FISA Court’s warrants are constitutional, but the NSA’s surveillance is unconstitutional. Even though people do not like the NSA’s surveillance, the NSA is legal because the FISA Court that the people did not mind makes it legal.
The Fourth Amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses papers, and effects..." this in the minds of the people alludes to the right of privacy. However, society misses the other half of this Amendment, which is, "...against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause..." In the case of the Government having moderation over the internet, people use the Fourth Amendment on their side. Yet, the Amendment supports the side of the Government. When the Government moderates the internet, they are doing it for the safety of the nation.
After the gruesome attacks of 9/11, the United States government passed a legislation called the Patriot Act in attempt to cut down on the terror attacks. This act gives the NSA, or National Security Agency, the ability to oversee our actions. The NSA’s approach to surveilling the population is obtaining the information by tapping into technology, such as phone calls, internet pages and searches, and viewing emails and texts. Thus, controversy has triggered due to the fact that these actions are unconstitutional, and much terrorism that remains. The NSA should be greatly altered because they invade the privacy of Americans, unlawfully goes against the constitution, and we lose our rights.
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
In this paper, I argue against Government Surveillance. Although a society full of cameras could help solve some crimes, it is also true that the Constitution, through the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Despite the fact that this is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law should be monitored. In addition, increasing political surveillance with the excuse of protection against war or enemies only fuels the fact that innocent people’s lives are being monitored. Finally, the information collected by the mass internet surveillance programs could be used for other harmful purposes since hackers could gain access to the databases and sell the information to other companies or terrorist groups.
This may include taking certain precautions for personal protection, and avoiding being alone at large events. Since the Internet is widely used as a tool by human traffickers, it is vital that the public be taught how to protect themselves in the cyber world. Training the public, particularly children and teenagers, on proper Internet and social media usage can be an invaluable tool in preventing further victimization efforts by human traffickers. Partnerships with concerned citizens, civic groups, and social groups will assist law enforcement in the prevention and detection human
With the advancement of surveillance technology, many citizens feel that their privacy rights have been violated due to homeland security and the threat of terrorism. Throughout history our government has implemented domestic and international surveillance as a way to safeguard our society from other countries. Now the question that seems to arise within our society is if the government is infringing on our civil liberties? Or is this indeed protecting our nation from imminent danger?
Multiple parents have sued public libraries for allowing their children to access pornography on the internet due to inadequate filters. In fact, many parents are quick to believe that libraries “have an ethical duty to protect their children” (Wyatt). However, it is not part of a librarian’s job to monitor children in libraries, and filters in place cause parents to believe that their children are safe under false pretenses. Officially, a public court maintained that “unsupervised use of computers is not a creation of danger” (Wyatt). Many students have access to unsupervised computers and can reach improperly filtered information, even though the parents believe that their children are protected from this.
False assumption: A. First false assumption: Claire Perry suggests curtailing online activity late at night by unplugging the internet router; moreover, she says that teenagers have no right to keep their messages private and that parents ought to feel empowered enough to demand access to them. I believe that this is a huge mistake because children would feel dominated by their parents without any sense of freedom. Evidence: According to a parenting editor at Common Sense Media Caroline Knorr, who was mentioned in the article “should parents snoop on their kids online?”
An article published by BBC News UK states that almost one out of five children have at some point experienced to be bullied online. These dangers are only som of many dangers youths may have to deal with in the world because of the technology. Despite of the dangers to brows the internet, the web can also be a great source for information and pleasure, but it is important to know the risks as well. Just because there are some dangerous things about the web.
Staying Safe Online - for Teenagers & Adult Please carefully consider and abide by the tips below and remember that they apply to public posts and private messages. The importance of staying safe online cannot be overestimated. Always keep in mind that there are lots of dangerous people online. Many of them are very good at pretending to be someone else and winning your trust. Please read the SMART Guidelines below, for useful tips on staying safe online.