The internet used to be a source for researching information, but today it is used as a battle field of hate and shame. Many people are using social media as a way of being spiteful and mean to others. People are sometimes being recorded against their will and placed on internet sites for other people to view. Some may see it as a funny joke, but the person who it is actually happening to sees it as humiliating and violating.
"Who has the right to monitor internet usage and, if so, when are they allowed to have access to someoneâ€™s internet? The government has the right to monitor someoneâ€™s internet history and usage when there is a potential threat to someoneâ€™s security or safety. Many other aspects of US citizensâ€™ lives are regulated and regulating internet just be adding one more thing to the list. Some argue for limited monitoring, while others believe that the internet should be censored. Censorship of the internet restricts first and ninth amendment rights, but also gives a sense of security to many people.
That being said, the internet could be a very dangerous thing for children to discover. The internet has many uses and can teach us many great things but letting children use it can lead to bad things, such as changes in attitude, thought process and general health conditions. It could corrupt their minds in ways that may not be suitable for the youth. An example of negative access to the internet would have to violence.
Diebel blames attributes the blame to banks when they chose security questions to "improve their security measures for online banking" (2). She says that other websites probably assumed the banks knew what they were doing and followed suit (2). She states that security questions are much more insecure than they seem at first glance, and "the answers to many of them can be easily researched or guessed" (3). She also points out incidents of famous people 's accounts getting hacked into via security questions (5), followed by an example of a recent cyber attack on average people (6, 7). Diebel also includes a quote from a cybersecurity expert stating that one reason security questions are still used is because of convenience, instead of having good security (8).
The solution is pre-victim should always review bank and credit card statement. This is because can catch it in shorter time when the credit card data is stolen then can immediately report to the bank service and credit card companies for anything of the account was out of the ordinary. Other than that, people should practice safe online shopping, such as look for trustmark like McAfee SECURE ™ to inform the site whether is
The debate that is occurring is about screen time and the internet. The five articles about this topic are Cyberbullying Is a Bigger Problem Than Screen Time Addiction by Brendesha Tynes, Blame Society, Not the Screen Time by Danah Boyd, Don’t Limit Your Teen’s Screen Time by Chris Bergman, How to Regulate Your Child’s Use of Technology at Every Age by Kimberly Young, Teens and Screen Time Is a Problem, But More Study Is Needed by Marc Potenza. The authors are in stasis on the level of fact and definition. However, where they sway in terms of stasis is on how to proceed with this information.
Whether it may be a scam to strip an individual of their credit card information or an act of potential abduction, these people are able to hide behind a computer screen with a smiling profile picture and lure individuals into their entrapment, and given the nativity of the user, it might be too late before they notice they’ve been deceived. A person will never know who is really skulking on the other end of a computer, unless they know that individual personally and even then the truth can be blurred and they’d never know. Through an untrue post on Facebook a predator could appear to be a “friend”, and due to the choices one makes based off their assumptions, because of a deceptive Facebook post, could be the choice between life and death. Unless you are the person of the profile, the intent of a user and their truthfulness will always be
When buyers type in their information, the thief can then hack and take the information on their credit or debit card. Therefore, they will lose their money. Even though the real business companies does not know about anything, but the customer might not trust them anymore. It is not only effect the individual, but also a business company. Which will also have a negative feedback from their customers.
It is dangerous because it is initially deceitful. One of these dangerous include sexual predators. According to an online article entitled Negatives of Online Dating written by Julius Vandersteen, 25 percent of rapists found their rape victims through online dating databases (Vandersteen). From this, it can be concluded that everyone that posts a profile onto a cyber medium does not always have good intentions. As these sites are easily accessible, these cyber mediums also provide gateways to victims for those with malicious
Moreover, many people say that they find convenience and practicality in online dating. If you want to try it, go on. There is no harm in trying. Just make sure that you choose the best singles online dating site that will cater to your needs. There are different
Don’t reuse/recycle your old passwords. It is risky. Online criminals and hackers who may have stolen such passwords even before you changed them could regain access to your accounts without your knowledge. 6. Don’t use words that exist in foreign dictionaries as your passwords.
However, this line of analysis would lead to justiciability problems, because the loss of faith argument could also extend to those who have not even been victim to the data breach. For example, when online shopping technologies first entered the marketplace, many users feared that their transactions would not be secure and therefore refrained from making purchases online. This results in self-censorship or feelings of anxiety over control of information can arise from the fear of new technologies or from observation of others ' compromised personal information. But, even if courts were to consider such an open-ended definition of harm, the underlying cause of action could curtail lawsuits from parties whose data was not actually breached.
In the article “Let Kids Run WIld Online” by Danah Boyd She is mainly talking about how parents should let their son or daughter use the internet without any surveillance. I get how the internet can be an easy way to encounter rapist ,terrorist ,sex offenders ,and what young people say “cat fish” in other words someone who pretends to be someone who they aren’t. There is a show on MTV where they find real people who have someone (catfish)who they try to investigate whether they might be legit or not. After the internet came out to a vast majority of people (around 2000’s)