ipl-logo

The Limitions Of Limitations On Speech And The Freedom Of Speech

773 Words4 Pages

1.2 The Offence Principle
Several societies, even liberal ones, except to some amount the United States, have limitations on some harmless system such as open lewdness, solicitation, indecency of some exotic kinds, distribution of materials with offensive ethical and cultural slurs, displays of swastikas, Holocaust denial, and some sorts of pornography [3, p. 13]. However, there is significant doubt whether these can be justified by the harm principle, because certain sorts of unkind psychological con are not in theory harms per se. This led some, Joel Feinberg in particular; to adopt another theoryditions that can, alongside the harm principle, carry all of the work essential for a principle that has to deal with freedom of speech and set the bar a little lower than in the harm principle [3, p. 15]. They found their mission in an additional principle called the offence principle, which authorized the burdens of limitations on speech for its supposed offensiveness, slightly than the harm that is caused [5, p. 6]. Unlike the harm principle, it is not needed for speech to set back our interests, for it to be prohibited under the offence principle. The result of corresponding between the importance of the offensiveness and the reasonableness of the offending behavior, which might be very complex and undefined, will regulate whether the speech at issue is subjected to offence …show more content…

For example, when the motive of the speaker is simply malicious or spiteful, the offense speech canon be realistic in the eyes of law, or the reasonableness of the offensive speech here has less significance on the

Show More
Related

  • How Does Section 319 (2) Of The Criminal Code Prohibits Hate Propaganda

    549 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Keegstra was a high school teacher in Alberta, who lost his teaching license in 1984. Keegstra taught his students that the Holocaust was made up by the Jews to receive sympathy from society. Therefore, Keegstra was accused of being discriminatory towards the Jewish community. Section 319(2) of the criminal code prohibits hate propaganda, not including in private conversations. Subsection 2(b) of the Charter protects hate propaganda because it is a form of expression.

    Read More

  • Summary: Does The First Amendment, Free Expression Clause

    309 Words  | 2 Pages

    Does the First Amendment, Free Expression Clause, apply to the New York State law against Criminal Anarchy, depriving Giltow of his liberty of expression under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Benjamin Gitlow, a member of the Socialist Party of America, advocated the overthrow of organized government by force, violence, and other unlawful means through his Left Wing Manifesto. He was arrested and charged with criminal Anarchy, “the policy that organized government should be overthrown by force or violence... or by any unlawful means. The advocacy of such doctrine either by word of mouth or writing is a felony”. Gitlow argued that the New York law was an unconstitutional limit forced by the state on the rights guaranteed

    Read More

  • Should This Student Have Been Expelled Summary

    215 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the story “Should This Student Have Been Expelled?” by Nat Hentoff was a very good argumentative passage. Hentoff argues that freedom of speech should be valued no matter how offensive it is interpreted by others. Dough Hann abused his freedom of speech when he blurted out “Fuck you niggers” to black students at Brown University. A student asked Hann to stop screaming and Hann yelled “What are you a faggot?” Next, Hann noticed an Israeli flag in the student’s dorm and asked “What are you a Jew?” and shouted, “Fucking Jew!”

    Read More

  • Chaplinsky V. New Hampshire In 1942: A Case Study

    344 Words  | 2 Pages

    As Holmes had stated there are other forms that are not protected which are known as lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and insulting words. The case Chaplinsky v New Hampshire in 1942 determined that fighting words and other forms of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. Chaplinsky had argued that the New Hampshire law violated his Fourteenth Amendment which prohibits states from infringing on citizens’ fundamental freedoms and as a result, kept him from exercising his First Amendment rights of free speech. While states are not allowed to inhibit expression of ideas, the Court did not convict him for the expression of his ideas but because his words (calling religion a ‘racket’ and a city marshal ‘damned racketeer’ and ‘damned fascist’)

    Read More

  • Gitlow Case Essay

    1886 Words  | 8 Pages

    The test also justifies the prohibition of an entire class of speech if it is deemed dangerous to society, that

    Read More

  • First Amendment Limitations

    259 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another limitation that does not protect citizens under the First Amendment is using fighting words that disturb the peace. In April 1940, Walter Chaplinsky was in downtown in Rochester, New Hampshire handing out literature and speaking publicly about religion. As Chaplinsky continued to talk, the crowd continued to grow, blocking the streets and disturbing the area. The public around him became upset with Chaplinsky as he began to denounce religion as “racket”.

    Read More

  • Limitations Of The First Amendment

    960 Words  | 4 Pages

    First Amendment The First Amendment is considered by many to be the most important amendment in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights includes the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America. The First Amendment claims “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This is broken down into six elements: no official religion, free exercise of religion, free speech, free press, freedom of assembly, and redress of grievances.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

    1204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The article discusses how these are not crimes that are being committed, rather, these are crimes that are only being discussed. This raises the question of whether or not the United States is overcriminilizing speech. The article argues that in order for these crimes to seriously be considered as a criminal offense, the government needs to create an objective way of qualifying what is and

    Read More

  • Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist Case Study

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    Furthermore, this case involved the notion of “pure or symbolic” speech which continues to be a hot topic in society in most recent

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment Essay

    1483 Words  | 6 Pages

    Fighting words is a form of speech that is likely to insight immediate violence and are not protected. A case called Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) further explained this form of speech and what words are and are not protected. In this case the defendant, Chaplinsky, was not speaking with the purpose of inciting violence and starting a fight, rather he spewed insults. The court ruled that some words are so insulting that they were more than likely to result in a fight. This case further defined fighting words by including aggravating insults which are not protected by the first

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Free Speech Follies By Stanley Fish

    103 Words  | 1 Pages

    People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

    Read More

  • Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    A speech code is any university policy that forbids the use of hateful or contemptuous expressions towards any social group, particularly those categorized based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, etc. In this essay, I will explain why such regulations are justifiable for the reasons that Charles R. Lawrence Ⅲ states in Racist Speech as the Functional Equivalent of Fighting Words. He argues that speech codes “[do] nothing more than prohibit intentional face-to-face insults”(pg 175), and that “racial insults are undeserving of First Amendment protection because the perpetrator’s intention is not to discover truth or initiate dialogue, but to injure the victim.”(pg 175) A prime reason for many universities

    Read More

  • Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus Analysis

    357 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Derek Bok’s, Protecting Freedom of Expression On The Campus, he brings light to the issue of censorship in universities. He states that students at Harvard University got offended after a few students displayed the confederate flag. There have been many cases in which people have tried to censor offensive material however; the Supreme Court preferred to conserve the freedom of expression. He believes that if censorship starts to take place, it will be difficult to know when to cross the line. In addition, it will not fix the initial problem since the offenders will continue to abuse others using different means.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Fighting Words

    680 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the sidewalks of Rochester in the year 1942, Walter Chaplinsky was arrested for repeating ' You are a God damned racketeer' and 'a damned Fascist’ to a police officer. Chaplinsky’s statements violated a New Hampshire law prohibiting offensive, derisive, or annoying words or sounds said unto an individual or party in a public place. He appealed the decision of the District Court, and when it came to the Supreme Court, they came to a profound decision. Supreme Court Justice Murphy said there are certain words that could reasonably result in a fight or a breach of peace when uttered.

    Read More

  • Essay On Freedom Of Speech In Malaysia

    965 Words  | 4 Pages

    Malaysian has the right to freedom of speech which is guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution of Malaysia. The Article 10 allows all citizens the absolute freedom as not restricted by the government. In Malaysia, Law such as Publications act and printing presses give the Malaysian authorities the control over all the media. Any act that against this law may lead to fines or in much extreme cases, prison sentence. Although Malaysia has the right to freedom of speech, the media are still being controlled by the government which restrict them to publish anything against the government.

    Read More

More about The Limitions Of Limitations On Speech And The Freedom Of Speech

Open Document