The Pros And Cons Of Corporate Social Responsibility

Profit-Oriented or Socially Responsible? 2 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plays a crucial role in organizations and societies. Traditionally, CSR is a management concept that has been implemented by most of the listed companies around the world. CSR is implemented by companies to be responsible for the company’s consequences on the environment and social welfare in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders (Unido, n.d). In the other words, CSR is a program that benefits both society and business that do not provide immediate financial benefit to the company but environmental change and positive social (Investopedia,

Conditions and the private aims of the donors may alter the morality but not the general intangible worth of their private activities. While it's a fact a increasing variety of businesses plan to make their offering "tactical," few have joined giving to places that enhance their long term competitive possibility. And even fewer methodically use their distinctive strengths to optimize the economic and societal value made by their philanthropy. Instead, firms in many cases are deflected by the urge to publicize just how much effort and money they're giving in order to cultivate an image of care and social responsibility.

The neo liberal writers see it as voluntary, but some neo liberal see CSR as an obstruction and diversion from a business primary concern, i.e., profit maximization, yet most neo liberal writers maintain the point of view that, Friedman was actually correct. CSR in the long run can be beneficial to the organizations it prevents from unnecessary government intervention and

John Muir, a pioneer in naturalist, once quoted that “when you tug at a single thing in nature, you find it attached to the rest of the world.” This meaningful quote can be applied to business management, which is a subject that has interconnected relationships with different stakeholders. While people generally perceive the purpose of doing business is to maximize the return on investment for their shareholders, Professor R.E. Freeman believes on conscious business, which is also known as conscious capitalism. Conscious business emphasises on its ecosystem. It aims to create and optimise value for all stakeholders of the business, where this act is suggested to be able to lead a healthy, sustainable and resilient business, thereby to maximise the shareholders’ wealth.

As we know, philanthropic model consists of economic view of CSR plus option for a particular business to contribute to social needs as a matter of philanthropy, but not as a matter of duty or social responsibility. [Hartman, L., MacDonald, C. DesJardins, J. (2014) Business Ethics, Chapter 5, p. 222] Moreover, philanthropic CSR suggests that businesses contribute to society in the hopes that this will have beneficial reputational pay-offs. In other words, consumers prefer to buy products of brands that associated with a worthwhile cause when price and quality are the same. [Cone Communications, 2011 Cone/Echo Global CR Opportunity Study (Boston, MA: Cone), www.coneinc.com/globalCRstudy] Of course, there are also cases where a business might contribute to a social cause or event without seeking any reputational benefit. However, I strongly believe that it does not relate to "Walmart" because they are seeking to obtain any social and economic benefits.

Table of content Introduction 2 Corporate apologia 3 Image restoration 4 Impression management 5-6 Reference 7 Introduction According to (Kelley, H.H. 1980) "A number of articles have been written about crisis management issues by researches and practitioners in diverse type of developments and environments which make it difficult to understand and becomes an objective to the public". Crisis management tends to be a very vital and a demanding function of the organization. Deficiency might have a crucial harmful outcome to the businesses, it 's misadventures as well as the associates, and this might even end lifespan of the business. Public relations practitioners are known to be a very

The Benefits of Corporate Philanthropy When a corporation gives back to its local community and the world at large, it is making a sound investment in its long-term financial success. Unbelievably, today, some executives criticize corporate giving because it uses company resources, and they think it is more beneficial for management than for stockholders. However, according to the Harvard Law School Forum, there is a preponderance of academic research that shows a positive connection between corporate social responsibility and a strong financial performance. One example is the corporate giving by Patrick Dwyer Merrill Lynch and his family foundation. The top issue today is corporate giving to social services.

Social responsibility is an idea that companies should balance profit-making activities with socially beneficial activities and involve the development of a businesses that have a positive relationship with the societies. The missions of Under Armour are making all of athletes better through passion, design, and the relentless pursuit of innovation. There are four part of global corporate social responsibility in the pyramid which are philanthropic responsibility, ethical responsibility, legal responsibility and economic responsibility. First, philanthropic responsibility is on the top of the global corporate social responsibility pyramid.

This business is regularly followed by human resources, safety and health environment-related compliance and business integrity which is based on an independent external audit network evaluated programs called CARE. Therefore, Nestlé worked hard to ensure a high standard of both employees and employers welfare as well as other forms of its CSR aspects such as employee safety, environmental problems, and education. Nestlé believes that its corporate business responsibilities shape the way of business that form of the cultures values, although the basic foundation is unchanged from the time of the origins of the company. Thus, its corporate business principles

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), by definition, refers to the responsibilities of business that go beyond that of its obligatory economic, legal and technical requirements and more towards philanthropic actions for sustainability. It is rooted from the belief that a business owes certain responsibilities towards the society and stakeholders beyond that of making profits. Corporate ethics, which are the morals of right and wrong regulating the conduct of businesses, works side by side with CSR. In today’s increasingly globalized and corporate world, plagued by exploitation, inequalities and corruption of corporate irresponsibility, ethical behavior and CSR has grown in importance and has turned into an evident priority for business leaders.

With an economy driven by capitalism and bottom lines, it seems inevitable that nonprofits must tap into these business dealings if they are to survive. In respect to this, chapter three of Leslie R. Crutchfield’s and Heather McLeod Grant’s book, Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits, titled “Make Markets Work,” delves into the strategies used by nonprofits who have harnessed business tactics in an effort to increase their social impact. Using three overall strategies- change business practices; partner with business; and run a business- the chapter describes how non-profits have achieved such successful leverage in the business world. Opening with the Environmental Defense Fund’s (EDF) transformative decision to