The Pros And Cons Of Parliamentary Sovereignty

890 Words4 Pages

Parliamentary sovereignty is the founding principle associated with the English constitution and is based on the idea that Parliament has supreme legislative authority, also known as “Parliament Sovereignty”. This means that Parliament has the power to enact, overrule or repeal any law it wishes. The Supreme Court, which is the highest court in England and Wales, also recognizes this by declaring that no Parliament can bind its successors. This means that any law made by a previous Parliament can be changed or repealed by a future one. Therefore, legislation passed today may be amended or overturned tomorrow if it goes against the wishes of the current government. In this way, Parliament remains supreme and acts as the ultimate form of government in …show more content…

They gave the countries their own elected representatives, established devolved administration, and certain delegated powers (11).
A well-known definition of devolution was expressed by Sir Bogdanor(12) he stated that - Devolution involves the transfer of powers from a superior to an inferior political authority and the creation of an elected body.

When considering if devolution has limited the Parliament's sovereignty, we should consider “The Royal Commission report” it affirms that the Parliament is sovereign in respect of legislative devolution, as the reform asserted that the Parliament could repeal the Devolution Acts if it wanted, this held them to be sovereign and if affirmed that the fundamental of Dicey’s doctrine was respected. Although, the report also states that the Parliament before enacting legislation, the consent of the region must be given. In theory, this means that the Parliament's Supremacy has been limited, as it needs the “permission” of the region before

Open Document