The Constitution of 1876 was not the first constitution Texas had declared for itself. It was actually the fifth. When Texas had been released from Mexico's rule in 1836 it hastily drafted a constitution to basically cover itself from from any attacks. It was rushed and therefore nine years later another was written just before the annexation. Then in 1866 Texas after another constitution was written to changes with the times, Texas was trying to rejoin the federal Union and was required to write another new constitution. And then the long process to write the 1876 draft began. When the drafting process of the 1876 Constitution began, the convention wanted to add in several things to the bill of rights. It covered everything from Declaration …show more content…
We can see that one of the positives of this rewrite would be the fact that it is outdated, it is not "keeping up with the times" as some would say. It is strongly overdue to have a constitution that is as modern and urban growing as Texas is. We must revise the current draft to not be dated in 1876 anymore. It was made to benefit the ancestors that used to live here. Texans used to be be spread widely across the state. While it is the same today, we also have a much higher population than we used to back when we were settling into our ways as a state. This being said, it is a prime time to bring up another positive of a rewrite, the part-time legislature that we have only gets to meet once every two years and honestly that is not enough time to write a proper budget for our country-sized state. We are a large and strongly urbanized. We need a full time government to run our state and be able to speak up for all of our very loud opinions here in the lone star state, and we cannot do that when our state legislature is only getting 140 day biennial sessions. Now with every positive, a negative will ensue. One opponent of this rewrite is that it is the foundation of our state. While it is not of much order, people believe that it is what has made our country succeed, in some cases. Another is that in order to rewrite the constitution we have to have both political parties represented and they must agree to some manner, which is
Before the U.S. Constitution there was the Articles of Confederation. The document could declare war, negotiate treaties, and control foreign affairs. It couldn’t enforce laws, tax, and raise its own army. What the Articles Of Confederation lacked was a strong central government. Alexander Hamilton called for a constitutional convention in 1786, and it took place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787.
The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil
Unit 3 Test After the Revolution and the failure that was the Articles of Confederation, the nation needed order. Thus the nation’s leaders came together during the summer of 1787 at the Philadelphia Convention to draft the Constitution of the United States. The constitution was ratified in 1788. The Federalist Party had to gain nine of the thirteen states’ approval of the constitution to ratify it despite the goals of the Declaration of Independance. After the tyranny of the British rule, the new citizens of the United States wanted a severely limited government.
Key components of consideration that went into forming the Texas constitution. 窗体顶端 It can be argued that the key components of consideration that went into form in the Texas constitution were legitimacy, organizing government, providing power, and limiting governmental power. It was written by Alexander Hamilton that "constitutions should consist of only general provisions…" (Newell,Prindle,Riddlesperger,Donavan,Smith,Mooney,Pg39) This meant that any constitution that was put in place should be clear and straight to the point. The Texas constitution is a document that is so deep in detail and is so extremely specific, that it is always changing.
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who
There were two short-term events that precipitated the Constitutional Convention. The text, Experience History, by Davidson, DeLay, Heyrman, Lytle, & Stoff (2013), states that the first crisis, which was international, happened in 1785 because southwesterners were having difficulty navigating the Mississippi River. They were also still threatening to withdraw from the union and add their territory to the Spanish American empire (Davidson, DeLay, Heyrman, Lytle, Stoff, 2013, p. 195). In the text it mentions that in order to prevent the southwesterners from breaking ties with the union, Congress sent John Jay, the secretary of foreign affairs, to negotiate an agreement with Spain. This agreement was to give Americans the right to navigate the
The constitution was signed and sent out to the states in 1787, but was not ratified until 1788. During this time in the states the constitution caused a great deal of controversy. While some, the Federalists, believed that a constitution is exactly what was needed, others, the Anti-Federalists, felt that a constitution severely needed a bill of rights. There are many reasons a bill of rights was included in the constitution. Although it was not in the first copy, it was promised to be in the next one if nine states would ratify it.
The argument for revising Article V and making the Constitution easier to amend revolves around the idea that it is practically impossible to amend the Constitution with Article V as it currently is written. Nearly all of the 50 state constitutions can be amended under easier procedures than those in place under Article V and do not require as many obstacles to triumph. Since requiring a 2/3 majority in both the House and the Senate only completes one half of Article V, the additional condition for ratification requires ¾ of state legislatures support (75 legislative houses in 38 states), which is an extremely extensive task. This means that a proposed amendment can fail because of only 13 state legislative house in 13 different states. The
The Constitution of the State of Texas describes the structure and the function of the government of the U.S. state of Texas. It was established in 1827 when Texas was still a part of Mexico under the Mexican Constitution of 1824 . Due to escalating tensions between the two states, Texas established its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and adopted a new constitution. In March 1, 1845, the U.S. enacted a congressional joint resolution that proposed the annexation of Texas to the United States. The people of Texas approved an annexation ordinance and a new constitution on October 13, 1845.
This new Constitution called for something in between the last two forms of government they had: they called for a strong central government that would last but wouldn 't endanger the citizen’s freedom or rights. This became known as the U.S. Constitution. In the end of the Constitutional Convention, each delegate left with a copy of the Constitution to convince the states to approve it. It got ratified in 1788. In the U.S. Constitution, there were several clauses that focused on slavery, such as ⅗ Compromise, slave trade clause, and the fugitive slave clause.
I fully support the ratification of the Constitution. Although there are a few things I would change, I would say that it could be beneficial to our country. It brings me pleasure to know that in the Senate, we will have equal representation. However, the House of Representatives will get voted determined by the population of your state which I believe is unnecessary. The power of slave trade will go to the National Government, this wouldn’t be my top choice, but it has already been settled.
The Constitution of the Republic of Texas was the supreme law of Texas from 1836 to 1845. On March 2, 1836, Texas declared itself an independent republic due to a lack of support from the U.S. in their revolutionary movement. The citizens of Texas approved an annexation ordinance and a new constitution on October 13, 1845. On December 29, 1845, the U.S. admitted the State of Texas to the Union. After the Texas voters ratified secession from the Union on February 23, 1861, the Secession Convention reconvened.
As for the United States constitution, the Texas state constitution of 1836 rose a major section of the of the
Eventually, they came to a compromise and added a bill of right, later on, the Constitution was
The Constitution was scribed subsequent to the delegation that occurred at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This document was intended to be an improvement of the Articles of Confederation, in which the ending result was an entirely new government called the republic. The idea of institutionalizing a constitution created differences between the participants of the meeting. Those who opposed the idea of a new government and the constitution were called the Antifederalists and those who supported the ratification of the Constitution were federalists, which is the idea of federalism vs. state’s rights. The Constitution failed to protect the rights of the civilians despite Federalists attempts to persuade individuals