State succession is when one state ceases to exist or loses control over a part its territory and another state comes into existence or assumes control lost by the first state. Vienna Convention I and II define succession as "the replacement of one State by another in the responsibility for the international relations of a territory." One of the key questions that is to be answered here is who decides whether State succession has taken place or not. The international community can influence this determination. Third States cannot impose their view in cases of State succession.
There are two approaches through which a state succession can take place namely territorial approach and personal approach. Succession occurs when there is a change
…show more content…
The predecessor state is the original, pre-succession entity, for example the Yugoslavia or USSR prior to their respective dissolutions. The continuator state is the state that remains and continues after one or more sub-state entities break away from the predecessor state. Continuator state should continue the international legal personality of the predecessor state and may be required or entitled to continue the international organization membership and treaty obligations of the predecessor state. The successor state is the new state that has either replaced or broken away from the predecessor state. It should be noted that in the case of a pure state dissolution (for example as in the case of Yugoslavia), the predecessor state disintegrates into at least two successor states and that none of these states are considered to have become the continuator …show more content…
According to Article 40 , when part of a territory of a state separates from that state and forms a new state, the state debt of the predecessor state passes to the successor state in an “equitable proportion, taking into account, in particular, the property, rights and interests which pass to the successor state in relation to that State debt”. Public debt can be divided into three kinds: national debt, territorial debt, and local debt. Debt used by the state to undertake projects in a specific region is known as Territorial debt. For e.g. debt contracted for large public infrastructure projects. Debt that is collected by the national government in the general interest of the state is called as National debt. For e.g. debt contracted to pay for foreign exchange deficit. And local debt is form of territorial debt contracted by local government
In order for a proper government one state should have the trust in another. A functional society is one trust is
The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents
This was until the leaders of each state
The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational
Nevertheless, the idea of state sovereignty was not realistic and if the country wanted to remain in tact they would need a stronger central
Changes in values over time coupled with the freedom of states to secede could foreseeably result in a back and forth of secession and annexation of states. If the freedom to secede was a process with ease, the decision to do so could be made that much more flippantly and often at the cost of the citizens. Citizens would suffer the most, especially those reliant on the resources and opportunities provided by the federal government. Without belonging to it’s host nation, a state would be left to its own devices in terms of providing funding to sustain itself and its citizens (Pavkovic and Radan, 2007). The changes resulting from secession may be abrupt in nature, would most certainly upend the everyday lives of the people and would be accompanied with numerous consequences (Stepan, 1970).
Because some powers overlap, there is often conflict between state and national government (Morone, 110). Although most people trust their own state governments more than the national one, there is still a strong sense of nationalism (Morone,
Writing Assignment Using material from the reading, answer the following questions. How did people in Athens obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office?
The states retain their identity yet are also subject to the regulation of the federal government; herein lies the premise behind the development of international law. Baber and Bartlett advocate for the philosophies of deliberative democracy to govern the
Dual federalism is contingent to a division between state and federal authority, which can and does exist. This speculation between state and national can be both treated equally, be held and live with equal
No state can make their own money, declare war, enter into Treaty, Alliance,
Third article says the states act together in
In return for lending the money, the firm need to pay the principal plus interest payment at some agreed time in the future. The most common debt
Thereupon, student debt is generally defined as a type of debt
Since all modern states are nation states and under the umbrella of nation state, all the institutions, relevant offices, state policies and individual’s views should be on the same page or else otherwise the power, i.e. the one who’s responsibility is to maintain the state’s writ, i.e. the military would go and crush all the hurdles in order to preserve the state’s ideological as well as the geographical territory. The international law recognizes that the state can utilize its resources for the sake of its sovereignty within the given territory. If we take an example of our country, we find that despite of having diverse ethnical and cultural backgrounds we are still a modern nation state only because of religion. But the thing is that if we really want to form a modern state then we need to keep religion separate from the state since the very idea of modern state is to keep the state