Introduction:
Law has been existed since the ancient times in various ways, sometimes it is to protect human from their rights or to make people aware of their limits. Today, Law plays an important role in our day to day life for helping us to behave in certain ways and abide by the rules in the society which we live. Our behaviour towards the neighbours is considered to be an essential aspect to help us live in harmony and togetherness.
However, it’s our duty to care and respect our neighbours ad failing so might lead us to law cases. Such is the case for Sarah and Mary.
According to the above scenario, Mary, Sara, Vincent and the stray dog which was named Cookie formed part of the Civil law theory. The Civil law theory is a form of private
…show more content…
Tort law covers most civil lawsuits. Essentially, every claim that arises in civil court, with the exception of contractual disputes, falls under tort law. The concept of this area of law is to redress a wrong done to a person and provide relief from the wrongful acts of others, usually by awarding monetary damages as compensation. After all, as per article 1385 from Code Civil Mauricien (CCM) “Le propriétaire d’un animal, ou celui qui s’en sert, pendant qu’il est a son usage, est responsable du dommage que l’animal a causé, soit que l’animal fût sous sa gard,soit qu’il fût égarer ou échappé.” Henceforth, according to the article we can consider Mary is responsible for the damaged since the stray dog; “Cookie” was accompanied by her. Therefore, it was her responsibility to take care of it and prevent it from entering her neighbour, Sara’s garden since it was under her …show more content…
There was a breach of contract between Sara and Vincent; she will not be paid by Vincent.
Ability to contract
As per articles 1123-1125 deals with the ability of parties to enter into a contract. In case there is a non-execution of the contract binding the two parties i.e. Sara and Vincent, due to certain conditions there may be no legal obligations attached to it .The three types are:
1) Full absolution
2) Partial absolution
3) Limited sum absolution of a contract
According to the case, Sara and Vincent agreed for the sale of the orchids, but due to foreseen circumstances, all have been destroyed by the stray dog Cookie. Therefore, since the orchids are no longer present the contract is not valid.
Nevertheless, all have been recorded on camera henceforth the unfortunate situation could have been prevented if Sara would take a look at her camera; however it was also negligence from her part. According to the case, it is only the next morning that Sara discovered that all her orchids have been devastated. It is quite certain that Sara might bear loss of income due to that situation.
Soon after she started to become very violent was not only endangering herself but also the lives of her children and the people around her. The doctor told Patrick that Sara needed to be put in an asylum to keep her and the children safe. Patrick turned his basement into an apartment where Sara was safe and had a private home care with
A final legal concern is Rita’s affair with her business partner Sam. While in this affair, there has been an access of unaccounted money towards her business from Sam. Financially her business is prospering because of Sam’s contributions, because of it there may be future legal concerns that may arise from her having to account for this money. Cultural issues
Marron Law, LLC is a law firm that is located in Hillsboro, Oregon. Their areas of practice include residential and commercial construction law, insurance law, trade secrets, franchise law, commercial lease law, commercial disputes, and real estate. Marron Law, LLC works on franchise law including contracts, sales and termination practices, and equal treatment of franchisees. Marron Law, LLC represents both the commercial and residential tenants and building owners with their evictions cases and rent disputes. This law firm helps the businesses and business owners in commercial disputes involving contracts, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and insurance disputes.
This Parol evidence rule, which has been considered as a common law rule, prevent the parties to the written contract from providing any additional extrinsic evidence, which reveals an ambiguity and refines it, in addition to the terms prescribed in the written contract which appears as complete. The supporting justification to this rule is that since the parties to the contract have signed a final written contract, the extrinsic evidence of the terms and agreements held before should not be taken into consideration while construing the contract, as the contracting parties had already excluded them from the contract. In simple words, one may follow this common law rule to avoid any contradiction with the written contract.
After witnessing her father break down because of his inability to provide for his family, Lizabeth, in a mess of emotions, destroys the marigolds, marking the
The short story ”Marigolds” follows the narrator, a 14 year-old-girl living in extreme poverty during the Depression, as she transitions from the innocence of childhood to the raised consciousness of adulthood. Lizabeth has been poor for a long time, and her story describes her battle with feelings of frustration and hopelessness at being trapped in such a desperate situation. I believe one theme of “Marigolds” is the idea that as we grow up, the innocence of childhood is replaced by compassion. We see this in Lizabeth’s emotional state after she taunts Miss Lottie, when she ruins Miss Lottie’s marigolds, and finally in her reflection at the end of the story.
The relationship between the law and society affects everyone and everything. How the law is written and how it is acted upon in society are two different things. It is imperative, therefore, that we as citizens pay attention to and understand the importance of the relationship between the law and society as it affects both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We engage in and witness the power of the law and society everyday. The law is personal, however, the law is also discretionary depending on where you look.
So atlast she finally realised she understood what and why she had the marigolds in her yard even though by now it was too late because she had destroyed all of the beauty that was left in in those horrible
Introduction Finders keepers, losers weepers is a childhood adage that means whatever is found on the school playground can be kept but there is no principle of law that supports an individual is entitled to keep something he finds, while the original owner bears the loss. The premise when something is lost by one individual and found by another has been expressed in various ways over the centuries.
Reynolds v Clarke (1726)2 Ld Raym 1399, Fortescue ruled that the difference would surmount to whether the consequence was immediate or occurred later, for which an action would otherwise not be brought. The rigidness in the distinction between trespass and case proved a problem. The solution lay in allowing the plaintiff to ‘waive’ the trespass and sue instead in case.in Williams v. Holland (1833)2 LJCP (NS) 190, the court of common pleas decided that this would be allowed if the plaintiff’s injury was occasioned by the ‘carelessness and negligence’ of the defendant, regardless of whether or not the act was immediate, so long as the act was unwillful. Thus one could bring an act whether the defendant produced immediate or consequential damage.
[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law
It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute.
Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.
The law is an intriguing concept, evolving from society’s originalities and moral perspectives. By participating in the legal system, we may endeavour to formulate a link between our own unique beliefs and the world in which we live. Evidently, a just sense of legality is a potent prerequisite for change, enabling society to continue its quest for universal equality and justice. Aristotle once stated that "even when laws have been written down, they ought not to remain unaltered".
What I will explain to you in this article will, how we are connected with the law and I hope, make you see sense in the importance of our laws in the society we live in. To be against the importance of laws in our society would show one to be ignorant and naïve. I encounter the law on a daily basis when I am driving. I have to follow the speed limit of each road, I have to signal before changing lanes, my vehicle must be in good condition in order to safely drive and I must obey all road signs as they are set in place to ensure the safety of everybody.