This study was conducted with a partner, since some parts of the experiment were able to be done simultaneously. One partner prepared a TLC developing jar by pouring a small layer of 4:1:1 propanol/acetic acid/water into a developing jar. A solvent wick was made by wetting a piece of filter with the solvent, and it was placed in the jar. A silica coated TLC plate was obtained, and a spotting line was carefully drawn approximately 1.5 cm from the bottom of the plate using a pencil. Extra care was taken to not touch the plate with bare skin. Five spots were labeled on the line and each amino acid standard was spotted on the plate using a capillary tube. The standards included leucine, alanine, phenylalanine, and lysine. The final spot was an unknown mixture of three amino acids. After allowing the spots to dry, the plate was placed in the developing jar and allowed to develop. The TLC setup is shown in Figure 2. Once the solvent front reached a considerable distance, the plate was removed from the jar, …show more content…
The setup for the cation exchange chromatography is shown in Figure 3. This was done by plugging the bottom of a burette with a small amount of glass wool. The wool was lightly packed using a thermometer. Approximately 5 mL of Dowex 50 cation exchange resin was obtained in a small beaker, and the resin was mixed with 5 mL of pH 3 citrate buffer. This mixture was poured into the burette with the stopcock closed. The resin that had stuck to the sides of the burette was washed down by pipetting extra pH 3 citrate buffer along the sides. The column was tapped to ensure that the settled resin formed a level surface. After all of the resin settled, the buffer was drained into a waster beaker until the level of the buffer reached the top surface of the resin. For the remainder of the experiment, the top surface of the resin was not allowed to dry
The test tube was swirled to mix the solution. A small amount of ascorbic acid was added to the test tube. The exact amount of ascorbic acid needed in the solution varied from .0002 grams and .00002 grams, but the electronic scale only weighed to the nearest .01
I first saw the warm in the beaker on the bottom crawling around and balling up. Next, I used a pipet to suck one of the worms out. I put my worm on my plastic piece that was filled with spring water. The water was full enough to fill the container about half way. I put plenty of water so the worm would not dry up and die.
A test tube was fully filled with water and its mouth covered by a piece of paper towel. The
Use the evidence provided by the tests to identify the mystery powder. The mystery powder (#5) is the baking powder. My partners and I figured this out because the physical and chemical properties of both of the substances are very similar. For example, both powders are not soluble in water, and they both turned red when they reacted with the universal indicator.
Lastly, the third graduated cylinder was labeled ‘V’ since it contained 440g of ascorbic acid also known as vitamin C. All three graduated cylinders were put in the 70℃ water bath after adding their own catalase alongside three test tubes of H2O2 for 30 seconds. After the specified period of time, the graduated cylinders were taken out of the bath and the H2O2 was added to each of them and that is when the timer started. The recordings were taken every 30 seconds for 90
Investigable Question My investigable question for the LJOC experiment was how does the pH level of the water in the jars affect the population size of protozoans? pH level, is a scale that measures the concentration of hydrogen ions. On the pH scale, somewhat surprisingly, 7 is neutral—not 0, and anything higher than 7 is basic, and anything lower than 7 is acidic. Background When we (Maleek and I) setup the experiment, which involved 3 jars, we weighed some grass and put some of the grass into each of the jars.
TLC was used to identify the actual unknown product as well as other products/reactants present in the filtered solution. The procedure was conducted by placing a TLC plate in a developing chamber that is filled with a small amount of solvent. The solvent cannot be too polar because it will cause spotted compounds on the TLC plate to rise up too fast, while a very non-polar solvent will not allow the spots to move. The polarity of the spots also determines how far it moves on the plate; non-polar spots are higher than polar ones. After spots on the TLC form, the Rf values are calculated and used to analyze the similarity of the compounds.
Lab Materials 1 small juice glass, dish detergent, table salt, contact lens solution, ice cold rubbing alcohol, 1 micro-centrifuge tube, 1 wooden stir stick, and saliva. (1;p 326) Method I collected 1/8 c of saliva, then added the following: 2 drops of dish detergent (stirred 30 sec), 2 drops of contact lens solution (stirred 30 sec), and a small pinch of table salt (stirred 30 sec). Then, I tilted the cup approximately at a 45 degree angle and ran ¼ c of the ice cold rubbing alcohol down the side of the cup, which formed a layer on the top of the saliva-soap solution. (no mixing).
The TLC plate is supported by aluminum foil or plastic. This technique uses capillary action to draw the mobile phase up the plate. In this experiment, the mobile phase consists of propanol/acetic acid/water. The purpose of the mobile phase it to carry the components up the stationary phase. Retention factor (Rf) can be calculated once the solvent has reached ¾ way up the plate.
Commercial vinegar, Yamaha brand 0.1 mol/dm3, NaOH soloution Phenolpthalein indicator soloution (50.00 ± 0.5 cm3 ) cm3 burrete (250.00 ± 0.5 cm3) volumetric flask a (250 cm3± 0.5 cm3)
Briefly, 1 ml of suspension medium was taken from the 10% tissue homogenate. 0.5 ml of 30% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added to it, followed by 0.5 ml of 0.8% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reagent. The tubes were covered with aluminium foil and kept in shaking water bath for 30 minutes at 80°C. After 30 minutes, tubes were taken out and kept in ice-cold water for 30 minutes. These were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes.
All the doses were prepared in distilled water using 2% tween 80 as suspending agent. The test substances were administered in a single dose using a oral feeding canulla after
A small amount of sand was added after the layer of cotton. After that, a layer of silica filled almost 1/3 of the column. Finally, another small amount of sand was added just above the silica. The column was given a little tap with an aspirator to make the silica more compact. Figure 2.
The developing solution was poured into a tank and was tightly covered with a glass lid, and the tank was allowed to be saturated to ensure that the solution was equilibrated in the gas phase. Silica plate for TLC analysis: A horizontal line was drawn with a pencil on the plate and it was about 1 cm above the bottom of the plate. The horizontal line was drawn faintly so as to avoid damaging the silica gel on the plate. On the horizontal line, two marks were made and one was named A and the other B. These marks were made towards the centre of the plate at a distance apart because when spots are made at the edge of a plate, the result would be an improper travel of the samples as the solvent advances on the plate.
That caused a new initial reading of NaOH on the burette (see Table1 & 2). The drops were caused because the burette was not tightened enough at the bottom to avoid it from being hard to release the basic solution for titrating the acid. The volume of the acid used for each titration was 25ml. The volume of the solution was then calculated by subtracting the initial volume from the final volume. We then calculated the average volume at each temperature.