The government of India tabled a bill on February 6, 2001 which banned tobacco suppliers from advertising their products and also from sponsoring sports and cultural events. The objective of the ban was to launch an anti tobacco campaign and also discourage adolescents from consuming tobacco. However, the decision was met with approval and criticism.
Other countries had taken similar steps in the past to curtail the use of tobacco. In 1991, France had a ban on tobacco which was declared by the French Constitutional Council as a need to protect public health. Up to 1998, approximately 4 million people were killed by tobacco consumption according the World Health Organization (WHO), and these figures are expected to rise. Therefore, India
…show more content…
An argument of the opposing side was that adults who smoke do so by their own free will and with this ban the government was exercising that right for them. The CEO of Equus Advertising, Suhel Seth argued that the ban was just “a typical knee-jerk reaction by any government to create some kind of popularity for itself”. Another argument opposing the ban highlighted the economic gains from tobacco and the impact it would have on the country. The tobacco industry provides millions of people with jobs directly and indirectly and these people would be affected from such a ban. This belief was not supported though, as a study on tobacco consumption and employment revealed that the policies to be implemented for reducing tobacco consumption were more like to create more jobs. It was also debated that tobacco was legal to manufacture and likewise it should be legal to advertise that manufactured product. The companies argued that advertising merely differentiates brands to people who already smoke; not encourage people to start smoking. They insisted that the ban would be ineffective due to the fact that foreign manufacturers would still advertise in magazines and other medium. The argument on rising healthcare costs was counteracted also. Those who opposed the ban claimed that costs arising from smoking induced illnesses could be compensated in the old-age pension schemes due to premature
Different groups such as the American Lung Society and American Heart Society started advocating for stricter laws regarding cigarette advertising, and have helped inform the public about the effects that cigarettes could have on the body. Along with advocacy groups, taxes were also put into place to dissuade people from buying cigarettes. The changes that were put into place have allowed for Americans to make an informed decision on if they want to smoke, and the many risks associated with
In the year 1600, tobacco spread all through the United States and in the nations around it. To the people in America, tobacco smoking was taken as a tradition which they all had adopted. By the year 1604, James I the king of England, opposed tobacco smoking, saying that it would cause wild behaviors to the people. By then, tobacco smoking had become a habit for most of the people in England and they begged to be allowed to continue doing it. In the year 1612, tobacco was planted not only to be consumed now but also as a cash crop.
Smoke Gun Advertisement Ever since the first cigarette was made, smoking has become a problem for our country, and it continues to negatively affect the people who smoke and even those who do not. People who smoke are damaging their health and making themselves susceptible to diseases like lung cancer and emphysema. People who do not smoke can be exposed to second-hand smoking, which can lead to serious health risks as well. The government has taken action to help the health of the country by paying for and creating anti-smoking advertisements to persuade smokers to quit or to prevent others from smoking in the future.
Essay 4: Timed Self Evaluation Essay An argumentative essay is a persuasion of sorts. You must take a clear position on a topic and then support that position with reliable sources that you have researched and logical information to defend your claim. To be successful at writing you must be able to master the argumentative essay.
COPD has been a high important cause of “morbidity, mortality and health care cost world wide” (Mannino&Buist,2007) and expected to rank within the top 5 in 2020 for being a “burden of disease” a study of which the “World health Organisation” had issued (Rabe et al, 2007). It is important to note that one of the biggest risk factor of COPD is “cigarette smoking” (Mannino&Buist, 2007). Further risk factors include environmental pollution, dangerous chemicals at work, old age, the genetic structure, and especially infectious diseases (Mannino&Buist, 2007). In countries where the income are higher the consumption of tobacco is also high about “73%” whereas in comparison to countries in “middle and lower income” there is only “40%” mortality
Smoking is a major problem that affects our population. Smoking was once thought to be harmless, however in recent years smoking was discovered to be extremely dangerous. Ever since smoking was discovered to be dangerous, there has been a great debate over if smoking should be outlawed. Smoking should be outlawed because it causes major damages to our society, has negative effects on those who smoke, and it has negative effects on non-smokers. First, smoking causes major damages to society.
The introduction of electronic cigarettes came at the perfect time for a success business. Tobacco advertisements were being regulated
Unethical marketing from tobacco companies drives
Before learning the side effects, issues, and dangers of the use of electronic cigarettes, I was under the impression that they weren’t harmful. I believed they were the safer option and if you weren’t doing it frequently or if it didn’t contain nicotine, then there was no issue in doing it. E- Cigarettes are marketed as a way of kicking an addiction to actual cigarettes, but anything inhaled into your lungs is not benefiting your personal health. But before, I did not know this and wasn’t necessarily against them. Truthfully, people in my close family use them and I thought it was a great way of ending a conventional cigarette addiction, and this made me wonder how bad they could possibly be.
In recent years vaporizers have become widely popular amongst the electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) market. The e-cigarettes are a battery-powered electronic nicotine delivery device, designed by some companies to also resemble a cigarette. It is designed to deliver nicotine to the respiratory system without the combustion of tobacco (Hon, et al., 2005). However, are these trendy devices beneficial or harmful to society? Consequently, this product may be a low-risk substitute for factory made cigarettes, without the inhalation of the harmful toxins.
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
Another reason why people should not sue the tobacco companies is because there are a lot of programs that can with stopping tobacco use that the indivdual can
I had earlier explained about how a ban is simply not a strong enough incentive for smokers to quit. There is always a possibility of them identifying other methods to continue smoking. It is true for one to ask can’t they not substitute tobacco for something else? As earlier pointed out, I am treating smoking as an essential good only on the basis that it is addictive which is very similar to the idea of salt being treated as necessary good which cannot be substituted. To conclude this reason, a policy maker will have to do more than just a ban on smoking as I had earlier stated that a simple ban will not have much impact.
In fact, those who smoke have their life span shortened by about approximately. However, the government must ban tobacco smoking in order to prevent smokers from lethal diseases, protect nonsmokers as well as saving the environment. The most obvious reason as to why tobacco should be
Many reports have been issued based on the evidence regarding the devastating health affecs of smoking and the expose of second hand smoke. Unfortunatly, cigarette smoking has reportedly caused about 480,000 deaths anually in the United States with an account of 41,000 deaths due to second hand smoking. It is indicated that America has the greatest heath issues from smoking. Neverless, it has been declining due to the rise on taxes and the promotions to cut down tabacco use advetisement. Smoking can be very addictive but there are many ways to help stop that I’ll get to soon.