Wells Fargo has been the talk of the nation for the pass week. The article, “Next test for Wells Fargo: Its Reputation” by Emily Glazer discuss Wells Fargo’s reputation under scrutiny and what we can anticipate. I will discuss the article, share commenter’s opinion and experience as well as my outlook on the future of Wells Fargo.
The following are the facts of Wells Fargo’s (WF) scandal. WF employees were opening false accounts, creating personal identification numbers and moving funds without consumers’ knowledge. As a result, WF was fined $185 million dollars. This however, is a relatively small penalty since the bank made approximately $23 billion in profit in 2015. WF made a profit of $12.2 billion in the second quarter this year and
…show more content…
In the comment section of this article, Barbara Cooper says “The peons are afraid of crossing their legs without management’s approval.” Cooper believes that lower level employees would have never came up with such tactics nor would they act acted without the knowledge or approval of administrators and executives. So how could 5,300 employee slip under the radar? She accuses upper management and she is probably right. No CEO would want to see lower or flat sales figures. As a result, there will be a great deal of pressure for upper and lower management to reach difficult sale goals and therefore resorting to illegal tactics. Another commenter, Powler Martin, agrees with Cooper. Martin says, “I have no doubt the executives awarded themselves higher bonuses on the basis of the “growth” in accounts that was occurring under the staff compensation policies they put in place.”
A third commenter, Harlan Crowder had been a customer for three decades. The WF sells strategy was so strict that he could not deposit a tax refund check payable to himself and his wife because he needed to open a joint account in order to deposit that check. Crowder says, “I did not leave Wells Fargo; they left me. You should not need to keep your hand on your wallet when you go to the bank.” In my opinion, no matter who or what is responsible, one thing is for certain, and that is that all management level will
…show more content…
The scandal will hurt WF’s reputation and their ability to attract or retain customers. But like all scandals with big corporation, it will be a distance memory in another month or so. The tragic truth is, Wells Fargo will always be too big to fail, even if it affects the nation at a macro-level. New rules and regulations will be put in place as a result, but consumers will never even feel the effects. Wells Fargo will walk away the same way BP did. BP spilled millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico; animals die, fisherman loses their job and I still pumped BP gasoline into my truck because if I do not, I will lose my
Wells Fargo has been in business for over 160 years and was founded on March 18, 1852, by Henry Wells and William Fargo. The company opened its first office, in San Francisco, on July 1852. Wells Fargo served the West with banking needs, which included gold and paper bank drafts, and offered quick delivery of gold or other valuables. In1855, the first of many financial dilemmas took place when a drought made it impossible to mine for gold, and this caused almost 200 businesses in San Francisco to fail, but Wells Fargo didn’t fail, they prospered. In the early1860s, Wells Fargo acquired almost all the stage lines from the Missouri River to California, giving them a monopoly on transcontinental delivery services.
It would seem the government did not fail to prosecute the executives responsible for the mortgage fiasco. “The Justice Department has an ethical obligation not to bring cases unless they have a better than 50% chance to convict. They argued the merits of each case and always came up short of the evidence necessary for a successful conviction. Greed is not a crime.” (Henning, 2015) The Assistant attorney general Lanny Breuer was not confident in his ability to prove criminal intent and therefore has not filed charges.
Today, Wells Fargo is widely recognized for its commitment to the Hispanic and Latino community. This commitment however, is not a recent phenomenon and dates back to before the turn of the century. Since its founding in 1852, Wells Fargo had encouraged team members to treat all customers with courtesy and respect. The once informal policy became company standard in 1888 when agents and managers were required to show “proper respect to all. Let them be men, women, children, rich or poor, white or black…”
1) -During the Great Recession Wells Fargo targeted black people and convinced them to take out subprime loans. Such actions lead to the result of Wells Fargo being sued in 2010 for discrimination and a year later settling the suit paying more than 174 million. -The early economy was built on slave labor. Not only did slaves build the Capitol building, but they built the White House too.
“The name Wells Fargo is forever linked with the image of a six-horse stagecoach thundering across the American West, loaded with gold… Wells Fargo earned a reputation of trust due to
Which enticed them to use fraudulent ways for meeting the big goals. There have been several former and even present Wells Fargo employees that have come forward to tell their experience of the huge pressure from the bank. The employees used unethical fraudulent means to achieve these nearly impossible sales goals. They did this by opening unauthorized customer accounts, giving out illegal credit cards with lines of credit. They even went as far
Lots of jobs were lost because of this glitch. Employers are going to lose their jobs in the future too. Wells Fargo plans to cut more than 800 bank branches by 2020 because some many incidents have
The company we know today as Wells Fargo began its’ long history in March of 1852 in New York City when Henry Wells and William G. Fargo joined with several other investors to start a shipping company. This was not the first time these two had worked together, however, or the first shipping company that these two men had been founders of. They were both pioneers in the Express industry and used these skill to open their own shipping and banking business. In 1843, seeing the potential in westward expansion, Wells founded his own company with George Pomeroy and Crawford Livingston originally named Pomeroy & Company, then Livingston, Wells, and Pomeroy, and finally, Livingston, Wells, and Company.
Home Depot Data Breach In the Home Depot data breach case, the hackers stole the login in credentials from a vendor who had access to the Home Depot network. The hacker used this access to install custom built malware that would focus specifically on the self-checkout terminals at the local stores. This custom malware was designed to be able to bypass any antivirus software, which is why the malware went undetected for months. ("Home Depot, Target:
On the other hand, they had other sales team members complaining on a regular basis that it was becoming more difficult to work with the employee. When management approached him about the issues, he felt like he could brush them off since his numbers were so good. Basically, he was feeling irreplaceable, so
Consumers place great trust in the financial institution that they use to store their assets. Banks are expected to be protective, responsible, and professional when dealing with client’s money. However in 2016, Wells Fargo received extensive scrutiny when it was discovered that employees had fraudulently opened more than 2 million bank accounts and credits under their clients’ names without permission for four years. Employees claimed that they were required to meet certain quotas for the company to maintain their job security. Wells Fargo violated many key tenants of business ethics by sacrificing their image, their clients’ trust, and morals to stay competitive in the banking sector in the United States.
Executive Summary Lehman Brothers were an investment bank involved in transactions worth billions of dollars and one of the most powerful investment banks in the world. Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008 following bad investment in the sub-prime mortgage market and used bad accounting practices called Repo 105 transactions to try and cover up the bad assets. This report sets out the use of the fraud triangle when describing the actions which led to the collapse. The pressure applied on the bank, the opportunity due to the lack of regulation to carry out the actions and the ability of the bank to rationalise their decision making.
When your organization is responsible for keeping track of the money and property of approximately 70 million individuals, you can be sure that customer service is going to be one of your most pressing concerns. Such is the case with Well’s Fargo, one of the “Big Four” banks in the United States. When your organization is responsible for keeping track of the money and property of approximately 70 million individuals, you can be sure that customer service is going to be one of your most pressing concerns. Such is the case with Well’s Fargo, one of the “Big Four” banks in the United States. When your organization is responsible for keeping track of the money and property of approximately 70 million individuals, you can be sure that customer service
It also generated $130M in liability and produced more than four thousand transactions in a day-to-day basis. The bank was located where bank robberies had happened over the years. Trained scammers were also rampant. These very well trained scammers would scam customers in broad daylight in front of many eyewitnesses.
Drilling into Disaster: BP in the Gulf of Mexico Gulf of Mexico is one of the valuable place in which it has variety of marine life, such as fish, shrimp and other species The issues of incident on spill oil should be on concerned as it leads to this disaster for human being and environment. The case is discussed how BP company responses. It means how its board and management accountability, corporate responsibility, risk management, code of conduct and whistleblowing, compensation practices, and stakeholder communications react on this disaster. With regard to the disaster, BP CEO should have behaved appropriately because he should have responsibility on his job and should give his employees a better solution better than not saying anything. The problem was still there even BP change CEO to Dudley.