Normal civilians forced to house soldiers in their homes, a state where you are constantly being taxed without representation, and only being thought of as a revenue stream for the crown. All of the things previously mentioned sound quite a lot like a totalitarian state and one anyone would revolt in. This helps to create the narrative in which the American colonists lived in, the times were very hard for the colonist because of the British oppression going on within the colonies. So yes, the American colonists were justified in declaring their independence due to the acts the British government put in place to oppress them. The American colonies under British rule had plenty of right to revolt due to harsh and harmful British law. For example, the quartering act of 1774, this act forced the colonists to house, feed, and take care of British troops. This act in essence turned the colonist to slaves within their own houses forcing them to take …show more content…
The Townshend duties where a series of duties imposed upon the colonists which taxed the importation of glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea imported into the colonies. Furthermore, all of the things that the Townshend act put a tax on where basic needs for life in the colonies and with the tax on paper even college and death were to now have taxes on them. With this in mind you can see the dangerous mind set implemented by the British; the British saw the colonist as nothing more than an income stream, a place where revenue was generated for the use of the crown. This ideology is extremely dangerous for a government to have for it makes the people nothing more than money to be taxed and takes away all humanity involved in governing. Not only that, but the citizens were not even allowed to vote on there taxes sparking the no taxation without representation
The Townshend Acts were a series of four acts passed by the British Parliament. These Acts began June 15th and lasted through July 2nd, 1767. The British East India Company was required to sell its tea throughout London. Therefore colonists were required to pay tax per pound of tea that was sold.
How the colonists responded when faced with difficulty has greatly altered the path of their country. In 1760 a new king , King George III, came into power and brought destruction with jim when he began passing act after outrageous act which sparked a need for rebellion among the colonies. Did the colonists have valid reason to break away from great Britain? The colonists were justified in their actions because the king was a tyrant, they were being forced into silence, and they encountered unprovoked violence. King George III was constantly abusing his power over the colonists and acting irrationally.
The Townshend Acts were “to pay the salaries of the royal governors and judges in America.” They taxed glass, white lead, paper, paint, and even tea. The Townshend Acts affected and annoyed over one million colonists who drank tea twice each day. “Many Americans viewed the taxation as an abuse of power.” The colonists did not want to pay any taxes that Parliament put into place, whether or not the taxes were direct or indirect.
After the French and Indian war, Britain was in heavy debt and needed to acquire as much revenue as possible. Britain was so desperate for money, they did not care how they received the money and whose rights they violated in the process. Because of this unjust mindset, Britain was not merciful when creating ways to collect revenue. The British methods for acquiring money were purposeful but not just.
The American colonists were justified by taxation, no representation, and the lack of land they owned. I believe the American colonists were justified in breaking away from England because of taxation. “There is another late act of Parliament, which appears to me to unconstitutional…” (Document B).
Charles Townshend proposed a new series of act known as the Townshend Revenue Acts. “The Townshend Revenue Acts placed taxes on the importation of commodities such as lead, glass, paint, paper, and tea into the colonies”. John Dickinson was a lawyer who printed articles in the newspaper alerting the people of their rights and it was not their responsibility to pay for their debt. Some wanted to start violent protest, but Dickinson essays convinced them not to. The British colonies were still not independent and on their own.
At a time when the British Monarchy was establishing itself as the cornerstone of the emerging and dynamic British Constitution, and all British subjects, including those in the North American Colonies, were subjects of the Crown, Price provided the theoretical foundation to justify, and even advocate, the actions of the colonists in severing their ties with Britain. This was a very dangerous thing to do, he was after all lending support to those who were seen by most people as treacherous. However, although he was heavily criticized and was, at one time, fearful of his life, Price resolutely supported the colonists believing that their cause was justified and that the British Government, and the King no less, were guilty of denying these
Revolutions and wars are great events that marked the history of any country, and America was not the exception. American colonists enjoyed some independence since they could set their own rules. However, years later, the King George III set a series of rules and taxes that they had to comply. Although American colonists had a strong desire to be part of Britain, after some years, there were many events and issues between 1765 and 1779 which caused the seek for their independence from the mother country.
I believe that the colonists were justified in revolting against the government. The actions they took were extremely upsetting. The Proclamation of 1763. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it?
The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.
Britain was forcing the colonists to house the British soldiers and there was no compensation. The British government also violated the colonist’s rights by restricting trade by preventing other nations from purchasing products form the North American colonial market. Obviously, the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling because the British government was taking advantage of the colonists. Parliament applied various taxes, and forced the colonists to house British soldiers which violated the rights of the colonists.
The British government was not looking for the best of the people. They were only thinking about what they wanted; the government was not interested in what the people wanted so they decided to make decisions on their own, which resulted in changes that form the United States today. Because of this, they were justified in rebelling and declaring independence. One reason why the colonists decided to rebel and declare independence was because of taxation.
During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”
On the other hand the British deprived the colonists of even the most basic of rights. The American Revolution was more about Civil Liberties because there are three main arguments that support it: Taxation without Representation, the Quartering Act, and the Intolerable (Coercive) Acts. These actions that the British did justified the colonists’ revolution. First of all, one civil liberty that was exempt from the colonists reaches was taxation without representation.
The colonists refused to submit to a king that was only interested in their money, causing the colonists to become irate with the British once more. Since Great Britain thought that it was superior to the colonies, Great Britain did not give colonists the opportunity to speak up for what they wanted, which lead the colonists to rebel. The arrogance of Great Britain led to the rebellion of the colonists, which sparked the Revolutionary War through social, economic, and political actions. Furthermore, Great Britain caused a tremendous amount of irritation to develop inside of the colonists. The Revolutionary War showed that it is a necessity for Americans to have their opinions voiced.