Monte Cassino has been referred to as “the bitterest and the bloodiest of the Western Allies’ struggles […] of the Second World War” by Matthew Parker. Four battles and a total of 75,000 casualties were necessary to break the German line of defence. From the 17th January to the 18th March 1944 the two sides fought fiercely over a twenty-mile front. Why did it take the Allies so long to pierce through German defence? The first factor to consider is planning and preparation for the campaign. The decision to invade Italy was taken in 1943 at the Conference of Casablanca and saw the two main Allied forces divided on what strategy to adopt. The Americans saw the invasion of France as the most pressing issue and wished to focus their troops there. …show more content…
An example is the amphibious landing in Anzio, which Churchill referred to as a “beached whale” in desperate need of help. The troops in Anzio should have cut off the supply route to the Gustav Line and attacked it with a pincer movement. The overall strategy was therefore, adequate. The tactics implemented were also satisfactory since 70,000 troops, 356 tanks and 18,000 other vehicles had been brought ashore by the end of January, enough to launch a powerful attack from the North and aid the troops fighting on the Gustav Line. However, the plan ultimately failed because of the lack of communication between the troops and the miscalculations of the leaders. Churchill expected major-general John Lucas, in charge of the campaign, to take advantage of the surprise factor and strike an attack that would cut off the supply route to Cassino. But the latter decided against it and followed US commanding officer Mark Clark’s advice to dig artillery positions to secure the bridgehead. This delay would allow the Germans to prepare an opposition force. Even though there had been some errors they only influenced single operations of the conflict and therefore, did not have as great an effect on the length of the campaign as the strength of German
Thus, though the battalion command made fatal decisions, as well as Chosen Company; they had no way of knowing the size and scope of the attack. The officers made their decisions based on what they believed was the best course of action. Unfortunately, some decisions would prove detrimental in the Battle of Wanat as many brave men lost their
The Battle of Dieppe, or Operation Jubilee, was a calculated collaborative allied infantry and naval attack in an attempt to take the port of Dieppe and the surrounding beaches. Before David O’Keefe’s scholarly contribution to the events surrounding Dieppe, it was largely understood that Dieppe was a trial run for amphibious attacks against the German front in France. It was seen as a huge disaster as sixty-eight percent of allied soldiers that engaged the Germans were either killed or wounded. There is a multitude of reasons as to why the number of casualties were so high. The most apparent of which being that the port, and surrounding beaches, were heavily guarded with artillery, machine guns, barbed wire, and German soldiers.
Additionally, by the end of the day, the Germans had retreated into the old city leaving behind huge amounts of land mines. The next 6 days onwards were essentially the same, they involved the Germans retreating again and again leaving booby traps and explosives for the Allies to find and the Allies pushing up to control much needed ground. But on the 7th day or December 28th 1943, the battle had finally ended. It involved the Allies pushing the Germans into a castle overnight and in the morning when the Allies were ready to move forward they found no resistance whatsoever, the Germans had found a small route out of the city and had taken it, the Germans had retreated. So on December 28th 1943, the Battle of Ortona or “Little Stalingrad” ended, leaving the Allies free to take the rest of the
General Pakenham was also guilty of this. In one particular fight, Pakenham led his soldiers to their deaths because he refused to wait to attack. Remini says, “Arrogant and overconfident, he undoubtedly assumed that he was facing an inferior force of undisciplined frontiersmen who would run as soon as charging infantrymen with fixed bayonets came barreling at them” (140). If this was the attitude of the leader of the British soldiers, there is no question that the other soldiers must have thought the same. In reality, though, the Americans were “expert marksmen” and “disciplined soldiers” who would defend the city with all their might (71).
At the beginning of the campaign the Allies were unsuccessful, however this changed as they began to gain the advantages of supplies, numerical superiority, alternate Pacific battles
Similar to the first World War, World War II was a dispute between powers and or countries and involved the death of million of civilians and militants of those disputing countries. There are many events that have made World War II significant and i will show you in this essay. World War II started basically because of one of the most known killer in the world Adolf Hitler. His role in the Holocaust is greatly significant because of the way that he punished, treated, and through of jews using concentration camps. In concentration camps jews were gassed, imprisoned and forced to do things that they didn't want to like forced labor.
The ALlies main strategy was to land amphibious and airborne forces on the Normandy coast between Le Havre and the Cotentin peninsula, with successful establishment of a beachhead with adequate ports. They planned for this operation for two years. From the beginning Eisenhower knew knew that air power would be a critical success in the
General Patton, in the Battle of the Bulge exercised the principles of mission command to the fullest and they yielded significantly great results for the Allied forces. General Patton employed each of the principles in different ways in order to ensure that the German surprise attack did not significantly set back the Allied forces in the war. The exercise of mission command allows a commander to conduct military operations and missions through dispersed execution. According to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-0, Mission Command, the definition of mission command is “the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations”. General Patton exhibited four of the mission command principles extremely well during the Battle of the Bulge.
Potent Leadership of Captain Jack Aubrey Beginning in the early 19th Century, the Napoleonic Wars revealed the ambition of the French Empire and desire for European domination, which was led by legendary military leader Napoleon I. As the French Empire invaded and conquered several countries, the opposing European coalitions scrambled to withstand and eventually defeat this rising power. While many would assume the strength of this empire too great to be resisted, one key factor gave the Coalition (primarily Britain) a ticket to victory: control of the seas. The mastery, size, and experience of this British Navy led to the defeat of the French.2 Perhaps most important in this fight was leadership and their use of unconventional tactics, which
On June 6, 1944, the Battle of Normandy began. This day, also known as D-Day, would go down in history for making a tremendous impact on the war. The German and American forces fought hard, inflicting injuries beyond compare (G1). Many people were highly dedicated to fighting for their country, resulting in many lost lives (C1). Many Americans were so determined that they actually swam into German fire to fight on the coast of France (F1).
Despite their loss, the inexperienced colonial forces inflicted considerable casualties against the invading British, and the battle provided them with an important confidence boost. Colonel Prescott’s leadership throughout the battle is an excellent example of good mission command. Upon receipt of mission from higher and given limited resources, Colonel Prescott effectively issued orders to his soldiers, which ultimately led to
The success of this campaign created a path way to Italy changing the outcome of the war. The Invasion of Italy was a major success for the Allies and caused the fall of the Italian Empire.
Churchill’s ‘We shall fight on the beaches’ speech on 4 June 1940 is a eulogy to the British war effort that has been immortalized in popular memory of the Second World War (Pixelstorm). He just weeks before became Prime Minister of Great Britain, the speech was rallying cry to the British people in the face of the German invasion of France. In it, Churchill acknowledges the great danger facing the country, but also expresses his confidence that Britain will prevail. Through his use of powerful language, vivid imagery, and determination, Winston Churchill’s ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’ speech effectively rallied the British people in the face of the German invasion of France, demonstrating the power of politics to inspire and motivate in
Italy has not existed as a country for long--for a while, Italy was a politically divided combination of states. In 1799, Russia and Austria managed to expel France from Italy, but this only lasted until the Italian provinces and city-states were once again conquered by France and fell under the rule of Napoleon. Napoleon established the Kingdom of Italy, but with his downfall came the territorial provisions of the Congress of Vienna in 1815. Throughout these decades, the Italian states were greatly fragmented, and Giuseppe Mazzini played a tremendous role in their unification. Mazzini believed that a common uprising would unite the Italian people--a philosophy which was successful for the most part.
In fact, during one of these exercises, a German torpedo boat caught this group by guard. Over 638 soldiers were killed. The Allied Forces also conducted an attempt to deceive Germany. Operation Fortitude was aimed at misleading the Germans with the date and place of the invasion. A few days after the invasion had started, more than three million Allied troops were in France by the end of August.