This problem has costs to the individual and society. Individually, this unfair treatment of minorities promotes psychological and legal problems. It also has many costs to society, such as financial loss. Most of this problem relates to the abuse of racial profiling as a scientific tool. Racial profiling should not even exist as far as I am concerned because it strictly promotes labeling among minorities. Just because someone may look different does not mean that they are up to no good. Racial profiling is used on everyone except white people which automatically makes it unfair. The police have developed this tool in such an unfair way that it completely promotes this problem of unfair treatment. This problem will not get any better until …show more content…
This problem is only going to get worse until we all put our foot down and make a stand to stop this issue. Even if we are not directly involved in this problem it is still going to affect us one way or another. This is our nation and whatever goes on in it is directly our problem. I believe that the attitude toward this problem is becoming more positive because our citizens are finally starting to realize how big of an issue this is becoming. Now that the facts are out in the open and you can tell that there is a big difference in the numbers between minorities and white people it is the criminal justices system to fix this internal problem. If they cant it will be up to the government to crack down and regenerate this fairness and equality among us citizens. Unfair treatment has been going on for long enough in this country, it has taken many different shapes and forms but has been present in one way or another. People are drawn to this country because they believe it is better than wherever they may have came from, but is that really true? It may certainly seem like that, but once you are exposed to what is going on then you may have to rethink. Due to this problem, movements has been present around the country to draw attention to this issue. They are determined to put an end to whatever might cause their mistreatment. “The black lives matter” campaign is a great example of one of these movements that have been impactful by standing up for themselves and calling out the problem. These problems occur across race, ethnicity and gender. Equality and fair treatment should be ethical and consistent among anyone in a position of that
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The issue of racial profiling has been called to national attention recently resulting in inefficient policing due to high tensions between law enforcement officials and minority races. The American justice system must take the initiative to end the improper treatment and wrongful deaths of people of
To summarize the article “Racial Profiling is Morally Wrong and Based on False Assumptions”, by James A. Kowalski, he argues that racial profiling is by no means effective, or good. It solves no problems, and causes people to fear law enforcement. Racial profiling is when an individual is suspected of a crime by law enforcement because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. For example, “all blacks are gang members”. In addition to Kowalski’s arguments, he references the Zimmerman case from 2012 as an example of racial profiling gone wrong.
Racial profiling is unjust, unconstitutional, and remains a huge problem still in the twenty-first century.
Racial profiling is morally wrong: I cannot stress this point enough racial profiling is morally and ethically wrong. It degrades the American psyche by treating its citizens as second class citizens. It generalizes,it paints with broad strokes that minorities are criminals and worthy of profiling. Not to mention that profiling by The United States is Hypocritical a country that promotes liberty,freedom and ideals of justice should not violate it 's citizens civil liberties,such as racial profiling does. Now,i will give a now famous example about racial profiling gone bad.
Although racial profiling is an issue that has various solutions, the main one is in the conduct of police officers to prevent unskilled staff doing a job they are not made to do. Conclusion Restate Thesis: There are many solutions that can put an end to factors that are causing racial profiling against African
In this process, it shows how social science research and policy analysis may be more fully than the police investigation so far practice their fair meaning. " Simply put, the debate about race analysis about whether officials could legitimately consider a person's race or ethnicity as a debate, they decide whether to stop or search for the person. Those who defended racial profiling began to think, Sadly, many types of crime are more concentrated in certain racial and ethnic groups are more effective than others in 1995 Tonry), and this fact means that racial profiling can often help the police against them monitor (2001 Derby). But even if the relevant distribution experience in criminal claims are true, it is impossible to solve the ethical
Racial profiling This easy talk about how racial profiling has always been around and how it have effect peoples’ life. Today we live in a society that should be moving forward from the pass but we have some much people that still cannot let go of the pass, which cause problem today. Judging someone base on how they look was something that was practice a lot back in the early 1900 and in today society, we still see the same practice.
Overall racial profiling is a violation of are individual human rights and it also violates our 14th amendment. Police should stop using this method and use other methods to figure out criminal behavior. We live in a world where people are still simple minded and can’t get out of their old ways. Being racially targeted because your black or muslin any other race can take a toll on someone
The effects can lead to something so powerful that could potentially ruin someone’s life, such as tainting someone’s reputation and stopping them from ever getting a well credited job. Not only does racial profiling affect law enforcement, it is also a known thing to be done in the work force. In most cases, before ever seeing a possible employee, their resume and social media profiles are seen ahead of time. Using what has been provided, assumptions can be made that can cost them getting or losing the job. It is as simple as having a name as Kashonda or being seen with a red solo cup without even seeing the contents on social media.
My opinion about racial profiling is split between it being effective and racist. Racial profiling does good for a community because it often gets someone who has committed a crime. Racial Profiling has kept crime off the streets. The media and politicians turn it into a big issue.
Living in the United States, Americans are living under the premises that citizens can live in a fair and equal state regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, or their national origin. But what happens when this is proven not to be true. Americans have a name for it when it is contrary to them not being treated equal because of race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. It is called racial profiling; birthed out of criminal profiling. Racial profiling, therefore, is the involvement of law enforcement officers in a discriminatory manner targeting any individual based on race, ethnicity, religion, national origin for suspicion of a crime.
Unfair profiling and the use of lethal force is causing war in the world among us. 939 people dead at the hands of police. 865 people were either unarmed, mentally ill, or of color. A number of people have been brutally shot and killed by law enforcement in the year 2016 so far, reaching 776 total, and the year is not over yet.
Racial profiling is ineffective because most descriptions of suspects are too vague and when police set up a description of what a criminal looks like, if they were to base it on the race of the criminal the amount of people who would fit that description is immense. The Boston Marathon Bombing is an example of this. When the police were on the lookout for possible suspects, they were looking for any brown men who were wearing backpacks. Elahe Izadi wrote an article titled "Racial Profiling Is Ineffective in Catching Terrorists" in which she discusses the flaws of racial profiling. Izadi points out, "Even if the public had known whether the suspects were white or "dark-skinned," that piece of information was still too vague to be useful—how
People may think this helps the police when it comes down to solving a crime, yet it fenders them tremendously. Majority of the time a race is singled out depending on the crime that was committed, while the police are looking for a specific race this gives the suspect time to get away, or even blend in with the crowd and act as if they are victims or bystanders. Clegg mentions “Some would argue that racial profiling is perfectly rational and ought therefore to be unobjectionable. The argument is that a disproportionate amount of street crime is committed by people who are young, and male, and black, and if you are all three then it makes perfect sense for the police to keep an especially keen eye on you, and pull you over more often, question you more carefully, and press you more aggressively to allow a search of your car. That is, it makes perfect sense if all the police are trying to do is maximize in the short term the number of their successful searches and arrests.”
One of the problems with racial profiling is that it is ineffective, It can be proven to be ineffective by a statistic in Chicago that shows were racial minorities were searched four times as often, but Whites were found with contraband twice as often (12 Racial Profiling Pros and Cons). Racial profiling is also patently illegal, it violates the U.S Constitution’s core promises of equal protection under law and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures (Racial Profiling). Discriminatory omissions or selective enforcement is mentioned by Macdonald in “The Myth of Racial Profiling” and also by the American Civil Liberties Union and is a problem with law enforcement that dates back to as early as the 1950’s and 60’s when southern sheriffs did nothing about groups like the Ku Klux Klan. A more recent example would be when the local police failed to respond to an African American man’s repeated complaints about property damage and being attacked after moving into a white neighborhood in Maryland, The man was eventually arrested because for shooting his gun while trying to disperse a mob outside his home. Racial profiling also is unethical and can raise racial tensions, it is unethical because it targets specific groups, while this may help narrow down a suspect pool, it also can target people who have committed no crime at all.