preview

Why Overfishing Is Bad

Good Essays
Overfishing Overfishing means to deplete or exhaust a stock of fish or shellfish by excessive fishing. This may not seem like a topic that is ever worth argueing over, or worth making laws for, but little do people know that the consequences of overfishing will soon affect the entire world. This will not only affect ocean life, it will also affect humans, as well as all other living organisms lives as well. There are already several overfishing laws existing, but they are easily avoidable and is done so with so many large fishing companies. These laws need to be taken more seriously and need to be highly enforced. if t some changes are not made soon then it could destroy ecosystems and leave the ocean in ruins. There are several ways to prevent…show more content…
overfishing will destroy ecosystems by eliminating certain fish that the ecosystem strives from taking away a vital asset will essentially send the system crumbling down. “According to marine ecologists, unsustainable fishing is the greatest threat to ocean ecosystems. The practice destroys the physical environments of marine life, and distorts the entire food chain in the oceans. If the food chain breaks, the consequences will ripple up and down to all the living organisms that are in the chain” (eschooltoday). This kind of behavior can lead to the extinction of certain marine animals. One link that breaks off of the food chain could affect the entire chain and lead to more extinctions and overpopulation. “The practice destroys the physical environments of marine life, and distorts the entire food chain in the oceans. If the food chain breaks, the consequences will ripple up and down to all the living organisms that are in the chain” (eschooltoday). If the food chain falls apart it will not only be marine life that is affected but human life too. Once the food chain on earth is compromised it will eventually direct human life. We will lose resources little by little and there will eventually be nothing left for us to strive on. Our scientific progression will come to a stand still and our new main focus would be to…show more content…
If we act now the effects of overfishing can be reversed. It would approximately take ten years to achieve this goal, if any more time is wasted it could take centuries to recover the fish population to a substantial amount. One way to start making a difference is to set safe catch limits. “A constantly reassessed, scientifically determined, limit on the total number of fish caught and landed by a fishery. Politics and short time economical incentives should have no role in this.” (Pepijn Koster). if every fishing company had a set amount of fish that they could catch and refrain from exceeding this amount it could give time and space for other fish to reproduce and bring the population back up. This could also prove that we do not need as much fish that are caught today to be satisfied, this will show just how much of the fish caught end up being wasted and not eaten or used at all. Another way to reverse the effects of overfishing could be to set limitations of the places that people can fish in. “The key parts in ecosystems need full protection from destructive fisheries; e.g. the spawning and nursing grounds of fish, delicate sea floor, unique unexplored habitats, and corals.” (Pepijn Koster). By setting these limitations it would give areas where certain fish are close to extinction and give them
Get Access