The disciplinary practices currently used in our school systems present a major issue on the quality of education in this country. Our education system should strive to implement disciplinary policies that foster a safe and supportive environment for every learner. Unfortunately the current zero tolerance policies have led to widespread disciplinary actions of school exclusion, which have not only been proven to be ineffective , but also have been correlated with increased negative academic and social consequences, especially for those of disadvantaged populations (Skiba & Losen, 2016). This paper will demonstrate the evidence showing the negative effects of the zero tolerance philosophy and suggest a new approach that social workers in the education field can implement to create a more inclusive environment for children from every population. The Problem Following the implementation of similar policies in state and federal drug legislation, zero tolerance policies were introduced into school …show more content…
Even after controlling for poverty, black students, followed by Native American and Latinos students, exhibit the highest rates of exclusion actions (Skiba & Losen, 2016). Studies show that black students are disciplined more frequently for minor violations and more harshly over all when compared to white students disciplined for the same infractions. Other minority groups have also been shown to have an increased risk of school exclusion. Disabled students are nearly twice as likely to face school expulsion compared to students without disabilities and students of the LGBT community have also been evidenced to have higher rates of expulsion. This evidences shows that the negative outcomes of school exclusion most strongly effect the minority populations already at risk for discrimination and exclusion. Another approach must be found to create a more inclusive educational
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
With this said students within low-income communities are already disadvantaged and stripped from many opportunities that other students are utilizing. Moreover, a black student is three times more likely to be suspended when compared to a white student (American Civil Liberties Union, 2023), and within low-income communities, children of color make up the majority of students, so imagine the number of suspensions that happen
The article provides pros and cons of the zero tolerance policy. With the policy, there are controversial views in regards if the policy is effective in schools. Some of the pros were that the strict policies can ensure that the school environment is safe for students and provide offenders with a firm consequence. This can prepare students for real-life situations, e.g. when a person is breaking a law.
Introduction There is an ongoing abuse of the zero-tolerance policy that continues to affect the lives of minority girls in schools in the public and private school sector. The current literature supports data that show that minorities are severely impacted by the policies. However, there is a gap in the literature that addresses the magnitude of how minority girls are impacted by these policies. Furthermore, due to the zero-tolerance policies, cultural differences are not even considered. Due to a lack of a universally accepted definition of zero tolerance, there are only estimates of the frequency of enforcement (Daly, Hildenbrand, Haney-Caron, Goldstein, Galloway, and DeMatteo, 2016).
The topic of zero tolerance rings a bell in the political world when it comes to racial injustice. Research shows that black students are 2.6 times as likely to be suspended as White students (Teske). This social injustice for students of color does not get any easier with zero tolerance polices. If anything, zero tolerance causes more racial discrimination and injustice.
The Effect of Racial Diversity in College Friend Groups on Academic Achievement Much attention is paid to the effects of individuals’ race on their academic achievement. Focus on the effects of race tends to be centered on a purely individual level – from whether perceptions of one’s own race affects experience to whether stereotypes of one’s own race leads to negative individual life events. The diversity of these social networks is undoubtedly significant in personal academic achievement, but what about personal ties that are made of free choice outside of family and classmates? Does racial diversity in friend groups affect people of different races equally in terms of college academic achievement?
supporters argue that zero-tolerance policies have made schools safer, while critics charge that this “one size fits all” approach fails to take local conditions into account. This lack of flexibility sometimes means that administrators are required to punish relatively minor
A recent influx of violence has impacted public schools throughout the United States causing school leaders to make school safety a leading priority. Zero tolerance policies were implemented in the early 1990’s, in an effort to reduce school violence. These policies generally require an out-of-school suspension or expulsion for a variety of behaviors. The chief administrators of the district have the authority to modify the expulsion requirement for students on a case-by-case basis. Zero tolerance policies are still a controversial topic to educators in America.
Remove or Revise Zero-tolerance policies are policies that have been adapted in work places, communities, and, most frequently, schools. Depending on how certain schools are run and who they are run by, zero-tolerance policies could be positive and helpful or negative and harmful. Many people wonder are these policies really effective in reducing crime and creating safer environments in schools like lawmakers claim these policies are doing ; most of the opponents to zero-tolerance policies believe that the policies are just cruel punishments that add to the problems that already exist in our schools and communities. There are obviously those who feel that the policies do exactly what they say they do; advocates for zero-tolerance policies
While people of color make up around 30% of the United States’ population, they account for 60% of those imprisoned (American Progress). Black males are more likely to face harsh punishment and discipline in public schools than other race. 35% of black male are suspended at least once from school and 46% of those are suspended more than once from school a year, according to the Civil Right Date Collection (The New York Times). According to recent data by the Department of Education, African American
The Zero Tolerance Policy is a major worldwide issue. Statistically it has been a problem in schools for many reasons but mainly because most believe it 's a racial factor in schools. It also brings down academic levels and a child 's learning ability. While researching the statistics I found out that many researchers have discovered that black students are more likely to get suspended, expelled, or juvenile consequences over white students. On the pbs.org website it stated that “Black students make up about 16 percent of the nation’s population in school, they account for about 45 percent of the kids who face juvenile arrest.”
Issue Statement Given the social problem, we need to modify the zero-tolerance policy or dismantle it altogether. Moving away from the complex, societal issues of the school-to-prison pipeline and zero-tolerance policies is not a simple solution. Solutions must work to first improve academic achievement by increasing the chance that students remain in school and graduate. Next, a solution must also focus on lowering the number of suspensions, expulsions, and referrals to law enforcement (Nance, 2016).
Education for minority students has continued to be secretly separate and unequal. Currently now in this generation two-third of minority students still attend schools that are mainly minority, most of them located in cities, and funded well below those in the suburban districts. The U.S educational system is one of the most irregular in the world, and students routinely receive dramatically different learning options based on their social status. (Darling-Hammond 1) When it comes to employment, the use of affirmative action is much different than the education expectation.
The primary decision is to determine if the item brought in as an artifact to enhance her report on the history of her home was in violation of the zero-tolerance policy. The parents of an elementary student demand that something is done about the student who brought a gun to school. They plan to contact the Superintendent and the local newspaper and other parents of the community.
The teachers need to understand the instructional designs and how to apply these. In executing this effectively the learning process should expose the utilization of theoretical frameworks, student centered learning, collaboration, culturally fit (diversity), awareness of different learning styles and reflective practices (Tuitt, 2003, p.251- 253). With this we can be sure that every child can learn every child must learn with inclusive pedagogy through accessibility of