Nicholas II of Russia Essays

Sort By:

Nicholas II of Russia Essays

  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A revolution was sparked, and led to the abdication of Nicholas II. When he abdicated, meaning he renounced the throne, he hoped his brother would rule until Alexei, Nicholas II’s son, would be old enough to take over. When Nicholas II’s brother refused to take the throne, the power was turned over to the Provisional Government. The government soon became chaos, with people splitting into different

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. Although other factors include the 1905 Revolution, social economic change, the Romanov rule (between 1906 and 1914), the effects of World War I and the policies of the Tsar and the autocratic government, is is proven that the main causes of the outbreak of the Revolution all stem from the Tsar’s inability to lead the Russian population efficiently. The short-term cause that is seen as one of the direct outbreak to the 1905 uprising is the defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Student Resources in Context” article entitled “Nicholas II” begins with a some facts about Nicholas II and his reign along with a brief timeline of his life. The article then sets up Nicholas II’s reign explaining the situation Russia was in and the death of his father. It then describes all the negative qualities of Nicholas II at that point that contributed to his eventual failure in ruling Russia. Immediately into Nicholas II’s reign at his coronation ceremony disaster ensued as members

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas II In 1917 the long trial of the Russian Revolution fell upon the citizens and serfs of Russia. The Russian Revolution was influenced by many people, but the country especially suffered from the choices of two men named Czar Nicholas and Vladimir Lenin. Both leaders had a different impact on the country of Russia, but Czar Nicholas’s poor leadership and stubbornness was the main contributor to the start of the Russian Revolution. Czar Nicholas II came from a long line of Russian

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The assassination of Czar Nicholas II was believed to be necessary for the overthrow of an outdated government regime because the Bolsheviks wanted the control of Russia for the people. However, it was unjust because the Romanov family was executed as well. Czar Nicholas II, also known as Nikolai Romanov, was the czar of Russia from 1894-1917. He became the Russian Emperor upon the death of his father and carried on his nationalism and autocratic ways of ruling (Nicholas II, pgph 1). Under his ruling

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II or better known as the last tsar was one of the most indecisive and unequipped to rule Russia "The Czar can change his mind from one minute to the next; he’s a sad man; he lacks guts (Rasputin). His indecisive nature led to many arising issue’s and opposition which he was not able to respond to with the speed and effectiveness of his predecessors, leading to worsening conditions in Russia. Most of this ineptitude stemmed from his failure to adapt to changing and worsening conditions in

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Russian Revolution, Russia had many failures during the war that prevented them from reaching victory. Citizens started to question the tsar’s ability to solve the country’s internal problems. After the demand for the tsar to step down and the troops joined the protesters, Nicholas II abdicated the throne. The February Revolution began with the women protesting in the streets for food. During this time, the parliament consisted of upper class Russians. The Russian Revolution was necessary

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian tsars are authoritative Christian monarchs which started in 1721 from one of the first emperors named Peter I the Great. This empire lasted until 1917 when Nicholas had to abdicate his throne due to many reasons and considered a backward country. There is also a speculation about two family members surviving the firing squad. The Russian tsars established in 1672 and Peter I the great was Russia’s first emperor. He was one of the most celebrated ones of the Romanov dynasty and influenced

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    historical monograph Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire, Dominic Lieven revisits the life and times of the last emperor of Russia and the Romanov dynasty—Nicholas II. Lieven analyzes Nicholas II’s life experiences from early childhood to his death during the Bolshevik Revolution. With the conviction that past studies on Nicholas II and the fall of the Russian Empire have been insufficient for better understanding the tsar’s true role in the context of his time. Lieven argues that Nicholas II was not strictly

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incompetence of Tsar Nicholas II surrounding and leading up to the events which caused the outbreak of the 1917 Russian Revolution can be said to be the main cause of this event as all the main causes can be traced back to the Tsar’s lack of the leadership skills required to run Russia successfully through times of war and national reform. Tsar Nicholas’ failure to adapt to the changing politics of European society and command his country with the strength and skills needed led directly to the

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romanov Dynasty Essay

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To a moderate extent, the First World War can be blamed for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Tsar Nicholas’s poor judgement in prioritising the war over his people led to both economic issues in Russia, and numerous defeats on the front. His decision to command the army further made Russian people lose faith in the Romanovs, as he was now responsible for all of Russia’s losses. Furthermore, Tsarina Alexandra, who was left to rule the country, fell under the destructive influence of Rasputin, increasing

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    industrialization was more prosperous and smooth than Russia’s because of the differences in treatment of factory workers, and adaptations to the developed foreign trade market, which ultimately diminished the efficiency of Russian industrialization. Russia was well aware that the state was in need of great change, even more specifically, the russian finance minister, Sergey Witte, had been writing

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have just arrived at the border via railway and have met the Russians. As we approached them I realized just how outnumbered we really were. I thought that we were in over our heads. I was afraid but I would never admit it. I steeled myself as we went forward. After the first shot, all of what I thought was fear had turned into excitement. It was now or never; kill or be killed. My gun was readied and I pointed it at a young fellow who was probably my age at the most. I put my hand on

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    an empress of Russia. Intelligence and ambitions led her to expand opportunity for the people in Russia. She was born German, and succeeded to become the empress of Russia, marrying the Grand Duke Peter at the age of fifteen. After a few months she ordered her husband to be removed from the throne, so that she could become the sovereign ruler herself. Peter later died in prison. With her motivations to rule the country she began to demand for domestic reforms, perceiving that Russia needed peace

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    spend his free time? Though this idea may seem controversial to some, in early Russia this statement had zero exaggeration to it. If the deaths of thousands of people due to psychological illness and paranoia is a normal sight to see in your eyes on a regular basis, then you might have lived between 1533 and 1584. During this time, Ivan Chetvyorty Vasilyevich (Ivan IV) reigned in Russia. The first appointed Czar of Russia, Ivan IV, better known as Ivan the Terrible, had a disturbed childhood which

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    him to cross the Rubicon river, Rome’s northern boundary, to protect his political position in Rome. By not disbanding his army, Caesar was effectively disregarding the boundary regulation of the Rubicon and this implied civil war (Class Notes Part II 2017:131). This ambitious action can best be described by a quote from Caesar himself which states “if you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases, observe it.” From a family that was not politically influential, he would become

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “fascism.” Fascism is term meaning that no citizen in the country (in this case) had rights unless given to them. Mussolini gave no rights to anyone but himself, and he made his own decisions, not caring about who it affected. For example, in World War II, he decided to ally himself with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi’s, not thinking twice about how this could affect his own country and the people living in it. This is very similar to the events in Animal Farm. For instance, Napoleon chose to fight the humans

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    while he and his closest affiliates grow fat.” (“By George Orwell”) Another huge similarity between Stalin and Napoleon was an introduction of a five-year plan. The plan was recommended by Stalin who promised to help improve and expand industry in Russia. His plan kept failing, but he never gave up. Equally, Napoleon had the idea of building a windmill, which will be used to help improve the production on the farm. However, the windmill was knocked down, and this represents the fall of the five-year

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Russian Revolution Many may argue that the Russian Revolution was a success or some may say that it was was an extreme failure. The Russian Revolution was a failure for various reasons. The Russian Revolution was a failure because Stalin was a monster, a leader who took advantage of many innocent people and killed them. He was a mass murderer. He used his loyal ones to his own advantage. Production, crops and agriculture had started to decline which had led to starvation and numerous deaths.

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Standing for Imperial Russia In the Russian empire there were two dynasties to rule, the Rurikids and the Romanov. Between the Rurikids dynasty (862-1547) there were four certain parts of Russia that were ruled by princes: Novgorod, Kiev, Vladimir, and Moscow. The Tsars of Russia 1547-1721 (ruler of all Russia) was the first to rule. Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays