Ratification Essays

What arguments were made opposing the ratification of the US Constitution? Ratification—the official way to confirm something, usually by vote. It is the formal validation of a proposed law. US Constitution— the supreme law of the United States of America The main arguments that were made opposing the ratification of the U.S. constitution are the power and strength that focus too much on to the federal government that will seem to threaten the states. The Anti-Federalists wanted the power to be equally

The ratification of the Constitution was written in time of opposition and argument, ranging from majority rule to checks and balances. This paper will explore how the conflict between federal versus national represents the central problem in the ratification of the Constitution. The views of the Federalists are expressed in Federalist Papers 39, 45 and 46. In Federalist Paper 39, Madison discusses the characteristics and implementation of a republican form of government. He argues that a republican

1. The Constitution’s ratification process included arguments for and against ratification by Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. Describe and evaluate the arguments expressed by both of these groups. The arguments the Federalists used in support of the ratification of the Constitution include a decrease in strength and authority of the federal government under the currently designated Articles of Confederation (Bardes, Shelly, Schimdt, 2015, pp. 46-47). Known problems stemming from the

some of the issues that confounded American society. In order to preserve social morals and improve crime rates, health, and the hygiene of Americans during the early twentieth century, the U.S Senate proposed the eighteenth amendment in 1917. The ratification of this amendment soon made the production, transportation and sale of alcohol illegal. The nationwide prohibition began in the United States in January 1920. Prohibition caused alcohol companies to be shut down by the government, yet there was

able to vote for government officials. Youth voting quickly gained many backers, and despite being favored by nearly all people, it was still viewed by then president Richard Nixon. Over time the government began to truly see the value of this ratification of this amendment to the Constitution. The Constitution, although the complete backbone of our nation, is not quite as perfect as we may believe, just as we may view our parents as invincible and yet they do fail at times. Learning from mistakes

After the Constitution was written by the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, all the individual states of America had to be convinced for its ratification. But, opponents, named "Anti-Federalists" opposed against the Constitution's ratification for multiple reasons: some thought that the Constitution would "take away the power from individual states", others desired "an even more centralized government with a single popularly elected government" and finally, some seeked for a Bill of Rights to "protect

protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document. Eventually, they came to a compromise and added a bill of right, later on, the Constitution was

Fifteenth Amendment. The ratifications of both of the Amendments marked a turning point in history, both in politics and society, by allowing them to officially have rights. After they were ratified, politics changed by giving African-Americans more representation in government, however socially, racism stayed the same by black codes being created while education changed through the Freedmen’s Bureau. Before the ratification of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth

(Center for Civic Education 69). I have spent nearly four years as a member of the Second Continental Congress, advocating for a strong central government, and had drafted the Virginia Plan (ABC-CLIO 1). As a federalist, I strongly support the ratification of the Constitution. The Constitution should be ratified for a number of reasons. First, “civic virtue can no longer be relied on as the sole support of a government that can protect

Following the framing of the constitution and the conclusion of the constitutional convention, political debate quickly developed as the ratification process began. As state representatives returned to their states, the press had already began shaping public opinion with the dispersion of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, and Anti-Federalists such as George Mason, Thomas Paine and George Clinton wrote with the intention of influencing

weakness by giving in to its people? The 18th and 21st Amendments of the United States Constitution just might shed some light on the situation. The ratification of the 18th Amendment, January 16, 1919, stirred up feelings of the American people. Americans started to express their thoughts and shared them with the government, this led to the ratification of the 21st amendment, December 5, 1933. This act of the United States government was made to please the people, some consider it a trade-off for

federal government that was meant to help defend the country from foreign attacks and promote economic growth. The weak document led to the eventual ratification that allowed the nation to adopt the new and improved Constitution. The Articles of Confederation brought issues with state representation, trade, and taxation that prompted the eventual ratification, allowing for the Constitution to take its place. The Articles of Confederation made for a weak federal government giving more

The United States Constitution was created to define the powers and limitations of the government. It replaced the Articles of the Confederation, and was ratified by all 13 states in 1787 (American Government, n.d.). The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition, and the government was split into two groups: federalists, and anti-federalists. The federalist group believed that a national governing body, ruled by the elite class was necessary. Antifederalists, on the other hand

Prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution, a series of eighty-five essays, later compiled and published as The Federalist Papers, were written under the joint pseudonym “Publius” by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In these essays, the three men expressed support for ratification by explaining the meaning and virtues of the Constitution (Brinkley, 139). Although, it did not receive such fame until the early twentieth-century, Madison’s Federalist No. 10 has since

volumes called The Federalist in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. These documents provided support for the ratification of the United States Constitution. They articulated a compelling version of the philosophy and motivation proposed by the new system of government presented by the Constitution. “The Federalist Papers were published and circulated in order to bolster support, educate and advocate for the ratification of the Constitution.” (Laws.com) Although the authors, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and

Throughout United States history there have been numerous issues, constitutional and civic, that Americans have debated. One of these constitutional issues that Americans debated, is the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists and Anti-federalists debated over the Constitution’s ratification for years. As a result of these debates, efforts by individuals, government, and groups, such as the Federalist Party, and James Madison, were made to address this issue. These efforts were very successful

The controversies over the ratification of the Constitution was taxation, too much power to the President, trading, and the lack of Bill of Rights. There were people who agreed to ratify the Constitution the way it is, which were called federalists. Federalists reasoned that Americans should ratify the Constitution because Americans are allowed to ask for additional amendments after they ratify the Constitution. The ability to be able to request additional amendments after supported the Federalist’s

Journal Entry: A Federalist's Perspective on the Ratification of the U.S. Constitution August 1787. As I sit down to record my thoughts, I find myself deeply engaged in the most significant debate of our time: the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. As a Federalist, I am resolute in my support for this new framework of government, which I believe is essential for the future stability and prosperity of our fledgling nation. However, I am acutely aware of the concerns raised by the Anti-Federalists

taking their power back from Britain and she makes this clear when she says that the constitution, “threaten to sweep away the rights for which the brave sons of America have fought with an heroism” (Warren, 156). Warren overall believed that the ratification of the Constitution went against what they worked

I believe that this investigation will find that the ratification of the 18th Amendment, banning the sale, transportation, and public consumption of alcohol, had a significant impact on the American economy of the 1920’s. This is because of the economic changes that occurred in different industries in the years following the ratification of Prohibition. The ratification of Prohibition was significant to the industrial aspect of the American Economy in the 1920’s as indicated by increased factory