Taser Essays

Robert Rosa, Plaintiff, vs Taser International, Inc., the legal theory pertains to product liability. Legal theory,” refers to the principle under which a litigant proceeds, or on which a litigant bases its claims or defenses in a case. It can also be the law or body of rules of conduct which are of binding legal force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by a controlling authority.” The Rosa’s were seeking punitive damages in the death of their son from Taser International, Inc., in

on Mr. Youngs forehead, as well as where the Taser probes penetrated his upper back. The photographs are stored in the “U” drive, in folder “Hurst, L” and under incident number “160183081.” An incident report was completed by Officer Pinkerman Report# 160183081. Officer Martin turned in the spent Taser cartridge (SN#C41041HTD) with two probes, barbs still intact, but wires disconnected, to the property room, property number 16004654. The spent Taser cartridge was marked to be kept for two years

Jeremy Bentham's theory of Utility and Punishment is one of greatest yet failed phisdophys I have ever read. At one point it acturly lays out rules for understand and responding to crimes,however, while making clear rules that cover crimes generally. Bentham oversteps in how he defines punishment and how that affects his argument in a negative making his argument less effective. Bethmen splits his theory into two section ‘General View of cases Unmeet for Punishment’ and ‘Of The Proportion

Introduction: The use of Tasers Conducted Electrical Weapons (CEWs), by police department agencies and police officers in particular, is becoming a disputable and controversial issue in policing, The criminal Justice System and Policies. This paper will explore alternatives from the history of Tasers, Human Health, Police Protection/Liability, Current Problem, and the Solution to minimize deadly force with the effect of Tasers. Most people would consider that the use of force (Tasers) would be a no-brainer

The research conducted in the study and article clearly shows that within cases where a taser is used to subdue a suspect or offender, people of African American race are more predominate to have this use of physical force used on them in contrast to other racial ethnic groups. This establishes that in police culture there is a stereotype that has formed that use of a taser is needed when some sort of resistance has occurred by someone of African American race. This may have formed from multiple

option to draw his weapon and fire or risk a dangerous car chase. Thankfully, he has a Taser gun on his belt. He is able to draw, fire, and apprehend the subject with little effort and no loss of life. His neighbor may have died that night if it were not for this modern technology. It is for this and many other similar situations that law enforcement should be allowed to use Tasers. Police should be allowed to use Tasers because they are a good non-lethal option. Officers have few options when it

will really put things in perspective, and make you grow a new sense of gratitude towards your career. That is, as long as it isn’t any of these frightening positions! Number Five: Taser Tester. Probably one of the more painful professions, people actually get hired to be a tester of police Tasers. It isn’t easy, Taser testers get shot with one million volts of electricity rather often, and don’t make much doing it. The average annual salary for this career is only $25,000- $45,000. Number Four:

this is a recent Taser usage by Nick. Nick responded with other officers to a trespass in progress. The suspect resisted officer 's attempts to place him in custody but eventually they were successful in placing him in handcuffs. After placing him in the back seat of a patrol car and seat-belting him in, the suspect stuck his foot out of the car door prohibiting officers from closing the door. Nick quickly attempted a variety of force options up to and including using his Taser to drive stun the

Tammy Lou Fontenot v. Taser International, Inc. 3:10-cv-125-RJC-DCK U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division (2012) Parties: Tammy Lou Fontenot (plaintiff) v. Taser International, Inc. (defendant) Facts: Darryl Turner, a seventeen-year-old grocery store bagger, is the deceased in this wrongful death case. Turner was fired and refused to leave the store’s premises peacefully, the police were then called. Police officers used a Taser twice on Darryl while taking

The case of Tammy Lou Fontenot v. Taser International, Inc. was about a wrongful death case named Darryl Tuner, a 17-year-old male employed by a grocery store. Darryl was fired for “insubordination” and refused to leave the grocery store. Police were called, and eventually used a Taser in order to take him into custody. Turner died as a result of the Taser being delivered to Turner’s body. Tammy Lou Fontenot filed suit against the City of Charlotte and Taser International seeking money damages

but at the same time be effective in stopping criminals. There are weapons that are less deadlier than the gun but most kill you. I think a good replacement for lethal guns are taser guns, and the taser x26. These weapons cause the least deaths but they are still effective in self protection and stopping criminals. If taser guns replace the regular lethal weapons in law enforcement there will be less long term injuries and less casualties. If there are less deaths there will be less hate for the police

enforcement agencies use the method of TASER as another force option. There are several pros and cons when it comes to talking about TASER (Rappert, 2004). With the advantages with TASER being used, the TASER would attack the attacker without a high potential of killing them. However, there has been research whereas people would be killed by the usage of TASER (Rappert, 2004). Firearms do kill more people than TASER (White, 2015). However, if a person dies relating to TASER, it is

was seriously thinking about reaching for the gun. SGT. Barrett asked me to switch to my Taser. Once I saw SGT. Barrett had me covered I switched to my Taser and reholsterd my firearm. I turned my Taser on and pointed the red lasers at the male. SGT. Barrett again commanded the male to put his hands on the door frame a couple more times. SGT. Barrett advised me to deploy my Taser on the male. The first Taser made contact with the male. The male ceased up and fell to the pavement, where SGT. Barrett

Johannes Mehserle had been through training for 2 years. Mehserle was trained by the best. In training Mehserle was trained to shoot two to three times to stop the enemy. In this case, Mehserle had only shot his gun once after he had mistaken it as a taser. Also in training

accident, in which he meant to use his taser instead of his handgun (Meyer). I do not believe this, and many others don't either. At the time of the shooting, there were many people who were either still on the train, or just standing by who witnessed the shooting. All of these witnesses got sent away on the train to

In 2005, in Camarillo, California, a young by the name Carl Bryan stayed at his cousin’s house overnight. Bryan’s cousin’s girlfriend accidentally had taken Bryan vehicle keys to Los Angeles, California. Bryan and his cousin wake up early the next day to travel to Los Angeles, CA to pick up his keys. Bryan and his cousin returned to Camarillo to retrieve his vehicle and brother. The California Highway Patrol stopped Bryan for speeding and issued a traffic citation. Bryan began crying and moping

On 12/03/2016 at approximately 2158 hours, I, Officer J. Wilson (2136), along with Officers J. Schettler (2164) and J. Erskine (2146) responded to a reported theft in progress at the Walmart located at 2501 University Commons Way. The on-duty Walmart loss-prevention employee called E-911 stating that a white male wearing a blue "Captain America" t-shirt along with a white female were removing tags from store merchandise and concealing items on their person. The complainant also stated that the two

for people they don't even know. Many times these criminals are using deadly forces against them. The public needs to know they are safe. Police should possess weapons of deadly force. Instead of using deadly force, use of non- lethal weapons like tasers or tranquilizers allow a criminal to be taken in for questioning which could be positive in some situations. A terrorist may have more information to be given, and if deadly force was taken, there would be no information to be found. If a child is

Many citizens believe that officers should shoot an armed criminal in the arm or leg, or have officers just use less lethal weapons like a taser or pepper spray against someone with a lethal weapon like a knife. Lastly, many citizens believe that officers should be able to deescalate the situation instead of escalating straight to violence with a weapon. One of the myths people tend to believe is why don’t officers just shoot the defendant in the arm or leg to get them to drop the weapon

The state gives a person a gun and a badge, it instantly gives them a free pass to do as they please and the right to kill whom they deem a threat to public safety. Police officers are the citizens who take the oath to “serve and protect”, but quite ironically they pose a greater threat to society because of the fact that they are everywhere and they just seem to be able to get away with everything they do to a certain extent. Where is that line drawn? Who makes the decision if they crossed the line