In his essay, “Managers and Leaders: Are They Different?”, originally published in Harvard Business Review, Abraham Zaleznik’s comments “ It seems to me that business leaders have much more in common with artists, scientists, and other creative thinkers than they do with managers.”(2004). Zaleznik’s observations provide an opportunity to review managerial and leadership functions, as well as to analyze the personality traits of creative thinkers, to look at their similarities and differences and how they fit into an organization.
Managers by virtue of the name itself, manage. They manage people, budgets, timelines, crises, projects and processes, and they are responsible for implementation, targets and results. Zaleznik (2004) writes, “It
…show more content…
Zaleznik (2004) comments, “Leaders tolerate chaos and lack of structure and are willing to delay closure” as preferences that are in direct contrast to the analytical mindset of a manager. They do however, provide “inspiration, vision, and human passion (Zaleznik 2004)” to counter balance the managers approach. According to a study conducted by Stephen Las Marias (2016) and published in his article “What Makes a Great Leader” for SMT Magazine, the top four attributes of a great leader are: ability to inspire others, empowerment of employees, integrity, and clarity of vision. The ability to inspire others doesn’t happen because people are wowed by an idea or impressed with an action. They are inspired to tackle something because they are made to believe that they can succeed. A great leader will affirm that someone has a great idea, or validate the dream of accomplishment, or plant a seed to nurture; they will support, steer, and nourish. Next is the ability to provide empowerment to employees. Great leaders don’t really empower others, as people can only empower themselves, what they do is relinquish power and provide the opportunity for the employee to assume it. Great leaders understand that they don’t have all the answers, they understand that collaboration is the key to success, and they understand that a more equitable power dynamic is necessary to have continuous movement forward. The next attribute in a great leader is integrity. Integrity is of course a trait that needs to be demonstrated by everyone including managers, and as it is ranked third in the study, it is very important in the eyes of respondents. Having integrity is doing what you say, and saying what you do. It’s doing what’s right not just what’s right for the company, and means admitting
Integrity is the common theme that guides the employees of the district. Integrity is always doing the right thing even when it’s the hard thing. Also, it can be defined as being honest and having strong moral principles. Integrity is not only an important trait for the district to have, but also for a person. I believe that having a set of morals is what defines a person.
Integrity is defined as the quality of having, living by, keeping, and defending one’s firm moral principles in all circumstances. Men throughout history have exhibited this trait. Martin Luther King, Jr., portrayed this quality when he led the African-American Civil Rights Movement. Integrity was also ubiquitous throughout the Bible. Joseph, a Biblical character, displayed this quality throughout his life of slavery in Egypt.
Since man was created, some of us were born to be a leader, some of us were born to feed off those who strive, and some of us were born to be both, to lead and to follow. However, we all look for those qualities in what makes a good leader, a good leader. What makes them stand out from the rest? Good leadership is doing what’s right
1. Leadership, according to the Coast Guard, is influencing others to achieve a goal. This is a simple definition that explains a highly complex idea in an extremely basic form. The differences between good and bad leadership is not given, instead the reader of this short definition is left with the inclination that as long as a given goal was completed then leadership must have occurred. A tyrant however, can influence people to accomplish goals through intimidation but that is not an example of good leadership.
Given these points, acting in a manner with integrity is to be honest, caring for own reputation, and not neglecting your current issues. It also means being mature and dealing with life’s
What does integrity mean? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines integrity as the quality of being honest and fair; the state of being complete or whole. Having integrity does not mean doing the right thing when it is convenient to you or when someone is around. I fully resonate to Oprah Winfrey ’s quote, “Real integrity is doing the right thing, knowing that nobody’s going to know whether you did it or not.”
Integrity can be defined as being honest and having strong morals. Being able to balance one’s own integrity and professional responsibility is what determines how successful they will be. If someone’s personal integrity and professional responsibility aren’t balanced, they will interfere with or hinder the other. Ultimately, a person is successful if they can balance their personal integrity and professional responsibility.
1. How should organizational performance at Montefiore be measured? Montefiore should be measured by collecting data that reflects the currents trends and needs of the community in relation to the hospital (Knickman & Kovner, A., 2015).They may use metrics to evaluate patient satisfaction, the success of their heart, cancer, and Children’s Center. They may evaluate how the delivery system is performing in their organization. 2.
True leadership requires one to be able to understand, inspire, motivate, and communicate with others. Good
Abraham Zaleznik in his article, “Managers and Leaders: Are They Different?” (1977) puts forth a claim that in every aspect of personality and reaction to certain events, managers and leaders are fundamentally different from each other. In this paper, I shall summarize Zaleznik’s argument and subsequently his reasons and evidences to make such a claim. To build on his main claim, Zaleznik at first creates a fine line between managers and leaders based on their personalities. He states that a manager operates in the realms of rationality; his reasons being the structured, ordered environment managers exercise their power in: the business organization.
Leaders who inspire and motivate others are effective at
If a person acquired integrity, they instantly become a great leader and a role model. A person becomes a leader and a role model when they have people’s trusts and they can immediately gain trust if they have integrity. It is crucial to have integrity because it shows that people can make right decisions whether if someone is watching or
The most basic definition of integrity stresses honesty and consistency between a person’s adopted values and behavior. While Becker (1998 p330), comments that “what the leader values and how the person acts” are not part of this definition and he further adds that the critics challenged that moral values and accurate behavior warranted moral
Nevertheless, I finished the required field work in time, thus managing account economics, and also built effective relationships with clients. This assignment built my manager’s confidence in me and increased my credibility in the firm. To me, definition of integrity is not limited to being honest. To me, integrity is the base of the trust my manager has in me. It is the foundation of the quality of relations I develop with my clients, colleagues, friends, and family.
In other words, integrity is not situation-defined or situation-specific. There are two critical components of integrity. The first is the adherence to a moral or ethical principle. The second is the pursuit of an undiminished state or condition, which is acquiring the strength character to learn from one’s past ‘mistakes’ and to continually seek self-improvement. Beyond doing the right thing, a leader with integrity is also not afraid of telling or speaking the truth in all circumstances.