With globalization over the world, technology and economic are developed a lot, people have a convenient life with happiness. It is seems as if everything benefit a lot from globalization. However, traditional culture disappears unwittingly from our sight, especially in China. If traditional culture disappears completely, people will lose their sense of belonging to their country and their country is equal perishing, so it is important to find the factors causing the traditional culture disappear. To explain what causes this problem, Taylor (1999) provided an « acultural » theory and a « cultural » theory of modernity to explain the change of the traditional culture; Robertson and Lechner (1985) use a ‘voluntaristic’ world system theory to …show more content…
(Taylor, 1999, P.1) It is a function to describe and explain the change of the culture with modern factors influencing. “By contrast, an « acultural » theory is one that describes these transformations in terms of some culture-neutral operation”. (Taylor, 1999, P.1) Acultural theories provided by Taylor (1999) describe the transition in a loss of traditional beliefs and allegiances. “With the concept ‘globalization’ we refer to the processes by which the world is being made into a single place with systemic properties, We argue that the overall process of globalization, and the resulting single global arena, can best be treated in terms of what we call a ‘voluntaristic’ world system theory”. (Robertson & Lechner, 1985, P.103) A ‘voluntaristic’ world system theory offered by Robertson and Lechner (1985) provides people with a dynamic overview for the change of the culture in …show more content…
(Taylor, 1999, P.4) With the process of the globalization, people face a lot of information from Internet and a variety of media channels, they learn the knowledge of technology to become rational and believe science more. From one point of view, humanity has shed a lot of false and harmful myths, which is valued a positive change. However, on the other hand, it has lost touch with crucial spiritual and a kind of belief. Once people are no longer impeded or blinded by false or superstitious beliefs, their type of life become single and boring: they don’t believe gods, they don’t believe insisting can lead to success, they even don’t believe emotion and at last they lost it. According to acultural theories provided by Taylor (1999), culture will disappear in factor of development of technology and human live as same as
The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution” (Natural). This is the reason that some cultures die out. Many of the cultures today only exist because of natural selection. Cultures should be allowed to die out because they provide useful information for future cultures on what should not happen. Past cultures lay the framework for our current cultures, as well as cultures that will be formed in the future.
Culture, with true consistency, has been continuously evolving throughout human history. Government, technology, and religion have all transitioned in some way over the course of our history, but a strange trend has appeared over the last two centuries. This trend has relatively nothing to do with the development of a specific value in society, but rather it points out the alarming rate at which society has been developing over the last two hundred years. To put this trend in perspective; the industrial revolution, which was the process of mechanizing industry in favor of increasing the output of consumer products, while at the same time catalyzing the process of urbanization, only took place two-hundred years ago - arguably. And in this short
The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.
Throughout all of history, it has been quite evident that successful cultures have been able to strive and prevail due to the globalization of items, knowledge, and practices and the contamination of aspects of one’s cultures spreading throughout another. However there are still cultures, ruled or dictated by religions, that cannot mimic such progress because of the unyielding attitude and strict belief of those who support religion and hinder they growth of their culture by remaining in their old actions and beliefs. The article “The Case for Contamination” by Kwame Anthony Appiah flawlessly shows these points through the examples of different religions and practices and after reading this article, my approach to this topic is quite similar
Anth 101 Journal 1: Ethnographer for a day First question, what is culture meaning to us? To me, cultural has many different meaning, it can be agriculture, lifestyle, arts, education, economic, and so on. In the middle of the 19th century, some of new humanities such as anthropology, sociology and ethnology are rise in the western country, so the concept of culture was changed and has a modern significance. The term was first used in this way by the pioneer English Anthropologist Edward B. Tylor in his book, “Primitive Culture”, published in 1871. Tylor said that culture is "that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society."
Technology will not change or replace us as people unless we allow
“You can only be independent of God while you’ve got youth and prosperity”, Mustapha’s choice of words, youth and prosperity, symbolizes happiness and success. He explains these features to be key to the independence of God since age, unhappiness and fear all draw man closer to what is Godly and divine. The World State has successfully created a society, free of religion, due to science. Science has kept the people from aging as well as insured their happiness through conditioning. Preserving the youth of people does however come with a cost.
Every society makes its own culture based on their language, religion, science, conventions, eating, wearing customs and social life. The culture also takes shape and undergoes change in time. This development can be in a short or long period. When the effects on cultures are taken into consideration, classifications
Only in the warm glow of God’s compassion could we air our disappointed ambitions, our unfulfilled frustrations and our heaviest sorrows. Religion may well have been a deep illusion but it was an important one. In today’s world of belligerent capitalism we need a loving, unjudging institution which evokes our better nature – our humanity. To build kind, secular civilizations in our own time we must never forget the purposes of religion – to offer us answers not necessarily to the hard physical world around us but to our spiritual selves, to offer us comradeship in the face of a climate of competition and, most importantly, to offer us fulfilment of our own moral
Technology can be defined as “the branch of knowledge that deals with the creation and use of technical means and their interrelation with life, society, and the environment”. (n.d.) Therefore, when we speak of technological evolution we can say that it is an “innovation and technology related hypothesis that describes the fundamental change of society through technical development”. Different theorists have their own perspective on the evolution of technology but, although each of their views differs from another, they shared certain common features, mechanism, and incidence in technology. Some theorists have developed distinct approaches to understanding the nature of the technological process and the relationship between technological development and the social world.
Cultural globalization is often understood as the spatial diffusion of global products. At a deeper level, cultural globalization may be seen as the contested process of internationalization of values, attitudes and beliefs. The spread of cultural practices and symbols makes the world more the same, but at the same time triggers resistance. Hence, cultural globalization while uniting the world is also seen to strengthen local cultures and is a major force behind the creation of identities. Such homogenization or differentiation can be noticed in the change of cultural practices and consumption patterns over time and space.
“How does 21st century globalization differ from 20th century globalization?” Globalization heavily implies the opening of local and nationalistic perspectives to a broader outlook of an interconnected and interdependent world with free transfer of capital, goods, and services across national frontiers. It also occasionally discusses the less common dimensions of globalization, such as environmental globalization or military globalization . Those dimensions, however, receive much less attention the three described above, as academic literature commonly subdivides globalization into three major areas which are economic globalization, cultural globalization and political globalization. The evolution of globalization is still open for debate according to some scholar’s dates back to Ice Age when people used to travel in search of food, trade and security.
As culture influences technology and technology influences culture, unexpected outcomes are bound to occur and each reminds us that the world will continue to progress due to this duality of
He asserts that the determinability of the mind through abstract ideas is the essence of human nature. Religious attitude, as described in this lecture stems from a belief in an unseen order and attempting to adjust one’s life accordingly. Objects of thought, what the mind fixates on, shape religious attitude. These objects may not necessarily be concrete; often, “things of thought”, as James puts it ignite a reaction comparable to sensory things. He points asserts the claim that concrete, religious objects are known through ideas and draw their inherent meaning from the ideas which they represent.
The (4) macro-system describes the overall societal culture in which individuals live. Cultural contexts include developing and industrialized countries, socioeconomic status, poverty and ethnicity. The boundary is defined by national and cultural borders, law, and rules (Christensen, 2010). A final systems parameter extends the environment into a third dimension, which is the (5) chronosystem. It is described as